The Unelected

2025-02-10

The "QANON Conspiracy" has been the subject of much mis/dis/mal-information over recent years, and Blighty's own Martin Geddes was in the forefront of checking out the Q phenomenon in the early days.

Here he utilises the newfangled AI phenomenon to review the output of the Q "conspiracy theorists" and see what the "non-human intelligence" makes of it all in retrospect.

"Now that years have passed since the peak of the Q movement and the media’s aggressive campaign against it, we can reassess how these articles hold up against unfolding events, new revelations, and the general trajectory of public discourse"

Over to you.

2025-02-09

Elon Musk's investigation of the USAID payees has been extraordinarily revealing, showing just where the resources have been directed - and apparently not toward the well-being of the average US citizen.

If reports are to be believed, funds have been channelled through UN agencies and NGOs (and elsewhere), making USAID more akin to a slush fund for illegal activities everywhere.

And yet...

"Most of the money subsidizing these human-trafficking NGOs does not come from USAID, it's from the United Nations"

The UK spent £12.79 billion on the UN's Official Development Assistance scheme in 2022 (including

2025-02-01

All you wanted to know about the Great Awakening - but never thought to see from the AI...

Martin Geddes' latest foray into the heart of the beast - and he comes up Trumps (so to speak)!

"I cannot over-emphasise the impact of AI on my own ability to analyse situations, clarify communications, identify options, select strategies, and write documents. It is absolutely transformative"

Is it for real?

2025-02-01

The WHO is an exceptionally remote body that is exceptionally well-funded, and through its constitution is more or less obliged to do the bidding of Big Pharma.

How so?

"The WHO is funded by countries and non-state entities"

" ... most of the budget is derived from voluntary funding provided by countries and private or corporate donors"

"Nearly all voluntary funding is ‘specified’... WHO must do the funders’ bidding"

"In response to its funders, the WHO has shifted focus to areas where large Pharma profits can be accrued"

So in effect, he who pays the piper calls the tune.

"Pharma

2025-01-31

Martin Geddes on "The Theology of Q" - with a little help from ChatGPT...

...  and neatly illustrating the differences between spirituality / divinity and theology / religion.

Confused yet?

Good - now include - well, I don't have a name for this, but we might choose "Social construction" or simply "Governmentalism", which is a bit like religion but relies on government dogma rather than religious dogma. It's religion for atheists if you like. It gives us the Green agenda, the UN Agendas, and just like theological religions, there could be as many varieties as you might find irreligious and unspiritual governments, and of course governments can mix and match from any dogmas they choose at any election, which makes for a moveable feast.

Maybe each political party should publish its dogmas as well as its manifesto at election time, then we might have a better idea of what to expect?

...

2025-01-30

Following on from the earlier Brick in the Wall communication (which of course we all watched mulled and eventually fully understood), this video starts by reviewing the Trump "inauguration".

"... they had to break that because there is no corporate and there is no spirit within the corporate..."

"... unfortunately the general public is not aware of the joke... "

Is nothing is as it appears?

I suspect so. The style of delivery is demanding of his viewers, but if we want the truth we need to work at it, as it has been forever obscured beneath multiple layers of fiction.

We are facing the deepest Challenge of the Assumptions! 

Still, one can begin to piece together certain

2025-01-29

Are we living in an asylum run by the insane?

After all, in recent years all the usual social and societal norms have been upended, even the rather longstanding biological differences associated with reproduction of the species (and not merely our own species!) have been declared both obsolete and changeable at will, despite the obvious difficulties and dangers of so doing and the consequent damage to the next generation.

Of course the insane are still able to deploy cunning to advance their misguided objectives, which somehow always seem to involve the need to control others who may not be of their persuasion.

Government may therefore be thought the natural habitat of the insane, being the only outfit legally authorised to deploy compulsion on

2025-01-27

For good or ill, change is sorely needed.

But what kind of change?

Well, there would seem to be only one candidate, a former scourge of the EU Commission, in the frame - Nigel Farage.

A consummate politician who (a bit like Trump) appeals to the man in the street rather than to the political hacks and media pundits.

So can "the Nigel" do for British politics what "the Donald" just did for the mighty United States?

Importantly, can he manage as well as politic? Can he mould public opinion as well as reflect it?

Can he outmanoeuvre the Sir Humphreys of this world and set Parliament back on track as the true representatives of their constituents who really do determine policy?

One thing is for sure - if the Civil Service under his premiership retains its "untouchable" status,

2025-01-27

Clif High lays out his personal view of how the power to control the planet may evolve over the coming year(s).

If we think that the old World Order is somehow going to continue, then we may need to reconsider.

This isn't to suggest that his apocalyptic vision is necessarily incoming either very soon or at all, but it does represent another part of the spectrum of possibilities that we may need to contend with. I judge Clif to be a very experienced guy who has knowledge and abilities well beyond the common man (although he doesn't kindly take prisoners!) so his views are likely worth noting, even if we consider both them and his style of presentation to be politically incorrect.

2025-01-27

Given that much of what appears in the press can no longer be taken at face value, and every politician worthy of note (or not) seems to be working to a concealed agenda (or not), it's become more or less impossible to come to conclusions about what any one of them may be up to, let alone forecast how the whole may resolve to bring us our future.

Especially given the breakneck speed at which the new Trump administration is breaking ground and breaking politicians such as presidents and prime ministers alike. It was hard enough to keep up before 20th January. 

Let's just say that this is a time when we all need a certain amount of faith that the Universe has our best interests at heart.

"Trust and verify" as used to be the motto of UN disarmament inspectors...

This for what it may be worth is Ben's viewpoint that he feels able to release in public this week. Whether we agree with everything is up to us... 

2025-01-27

Legal processes are infamous for lack of rapidity, and it's clear that time is required to make proper investigations and ensure that the arguments are properly presented and logically resolved. When the outcome will affect people's lives, that much can be agreed upon and should be uncontroversial.

It's a great shame therefore that the same thoroughness of approach was evidently not considered applicable to the Covid "pandemic" situation, when the WHO and all national authorities down to your local authority fell over themselves to introduce novel pandemic countermeasures not based on any previously accepted pandemic policies, and then to rush novel technology "vaccines" into the arms of everybody worldwide who could be persuaded or cajoled into accepting them.

That those whose traditional function was to "speak truth unto power" and to "hold authorities to account" should have inverted those functions to uncritically support the authorities "come what may" was indeed a surprise, a surprise that

2025-01-27

A everybody no doubt realises, Baroness Hallett's "Covid Inquiry Module 4" hearings grind on, succumbing to handy confusions over terminology which would be unacceptable in a school debating society.

Are the differences between Process 1 and Process 2 the same as the differences between Processes A and B?

I suppose it depends on how closely and confidently you were able to attend and decipher the long and rambling question.

"The inquiry has thus enabled a situation where the primary failing of the MHRA has apparently been denied. The truth can now be dismissed as yet another ‘conspiracy theory’ "

Happily for us mere mortals, the Perseus Group (who they?) has form in questioning the response of the UK medical regulators to the Covid alleged pandemic, and

2025-01-24

Javier Milei addresses Davos, 2025 style.

And as if that wasn't enough, a free extra bonus appearance by the new Boss, Donald J. Trump at 27 minutes.

(70 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2025-01-14

Here is one view of our situation as 2025 commences.

Whilst much of this summary is true, it obviously doesn't cover everything that is going on.

The truth is that no human being has a monopoly on the truth - we have to accept that, and work together to do what must be done.

"... they need us on our knees, they need us begging... hopeless... powerless... completely dependent on them, and they will do whatever it takes to make that happen "

It does appear so. "They" also need us isolated from each other, to prevent communication. If you are reading this, how well is that working?

"... you need to do what you can with what you have where you are, to not just become the best possible version of yourself but to create a life that you are in charge of... "

When push comes to shove, after we have made

2025-01-14

Well, it turns out that British weather in British winters can be quite varied. Some years the thermometer hardly dips to zero, let alone below it, and other years the weather gods send us glacial temperatures for days, even weeks on end, amidst flat calm wind conditions such as have been prevalent this winter.

And strange to say, the sun also is at its lowest ebb, the winter days are short and the nights long, and moonlight and starlight fire up no solar panels just as wind turbines hang listless for want of a gust. Naturally this comes as a surprise to many in government, who despite being told of these realities until the tellers are blue in the face (and not just from cold), they have had their attention fixed inexorably on the UN-WEF/IPCC models which perhaps have not actually modelled the variability of the British climate in particular, with sufficient precision.

After Professor Ferguson's models (of Covid pandemic infamy) one is tempted to say that we are surprised at the level of blind faith

2025-01-14

Shortly to get its second reading in Parliament, this is another Bill to usurp the power of legislation to drive the Climate Change project, removing our essential freedoms, and forcing our obedience to WEF-UN inspired NGOs and assorted other busy-bodies who would compel our compliance "for our safety" - all whilst bypassing the need for further legislation. 

Welcome to the New World Climate Emergency Dictatorship.

It's yet another way to tell us that it's all totally democratic because we voted these numskulls into office, so now we must do as they say.

The fact that whichever main party we voted for at summer 2024 General Election we were going to get a government dominated (by whatever means) by the UN-WEF global bureaucracy is neither here nor there - in practical terms we didn't get the choice.

We had to have a referendum before we could leave the clammy embrace of the EU - I submit that the measures

2025-01-07

Since time immemorial, humanity has been organised into groups - some cooperating, some fighting, some dispersed, some concentrated geographically, but in general all under some form of leadership.

If we believe the history books, then these leaders eventually developed into hereditary leadership families known as "Royalty".

Naturally, individual leaders cannot be everywhere at once giving people instruction and judging aberrant behaviours, so the concept of Royal Courts that administered each locality on behalf of the monarch was instituted.

Likewise the monarch could not know everything that perhaps he needed to know, so the concept of the advisory council (Witan in Old England) was born where the monarch could pick the finest brains in the land before determining on any particular course of action. From these beginnings arose our current "Parliamentary

2025-01-07

Elon Musk, a fabulously rich entrepreneur, who supposedly made his money creating new and very popular services such as PayPal, innovations such as Tesla self-driving autonomous vehicles, and who is also a defence contractor (well, a man must make his living where he can), boasts a close relationship with "the Donald" (and did I mention "X"?), is now seemingly entertaining himself by adopting a new role: the scourge of malfunctioning governments!

A tweet or two from Musk and the snowflakes in said malfunctioning governments clutch their pearls, grab for their smelling salts, and between hyper-ventilations write all kinds of opinion pieces declaring that he must be controlled, preferably silenced, lest he inflame their easily-deceived moronic voters into believing that changes may be desirable at the next elections! And (Shock! Horror!) he isn't even a politician, so what on earth does he think he's doing?!

He's setting an excellent example to the rest of us - he's doing his own thinking, coming to

2025-01-06

The recent multiple false flag attacks get some analysis, Congress is supposed to ratify the Trump presidency today 6th Jan (but will there be Congressmen available to do this?), the fog of war has literally descended across the US and elsewhere (fog in winter? Who'd a thought it?), and China is up to no good (just for a change).

Yes, apparently things are happening, but to what ends remains as impenetrable as ever.

Have matters reached peak pandemonium yet?

I fear not quite, but what do you think?  (Modest subscription required for full access)

2025-01-06

With Trump due to be inaugurated on 20th inst, those who would provoke WW3 are apparently working overtime to trap Trump into war with Iran, China, Russia, well, anybody really... 

Redacted reports... (feel free to check out when the "word from our sponsor" begins)

(14 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.