Free Citizen

2025-06-24

I think it was Socrates who made that observation - but then he didn't have the internet to enlighten him. Perhaps it was attributed to Socrates, or perhaps "Socrates" himself was just a pen-name for a disgruntled ancient Greek philosopher?

Perhaps if he had had access to an internet he would have... doubled down on that observation?

I suppose we should add AI and CGI into the equation to make certain that invention (whether of necessity or of an overarching need to maintain the pack of lies we are fed daily by media of all stripes and none) continues to pollute our intake of news.

I suggest that anybody who assures us that they have the real deal on news is suspect. There are so many ways to generate fake news that the ratio of fake to real probably follows the 80-20 rule. When you factor in that much of it is generated by those who own everything, or even whizz-kids who do clever things simply "because they can", we have a problem - what to believe?

2025-06-24

Sebastian Sas isn't your average YouTube interviewer - "formal dialogue" isn't his style, he prefers a good rant to point up all the inconsistencies in those who imagine themselves to be our leaders and betters.

One definition of madness is to keep doing the same thing whilst expecting a different result. If NATO knew what they were doing, the war would be over by now - but it isn't, so "something must be done".

To set the scene, NATO has no means to shoot down Russia's latest missile, so they have an innovative solution... will it work?

(21 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2025-06-24

Rupert Sheldrake (speaking at the Glastonbury Symposium 2020) now meets Martin Geddes (and his AI) to explore a startling proposition - that the Q drops were never meant to be decoded in the style of Sherlock Holmes, but rather to prompt our intuitive access to truths already "out there" within the field of consciousness, via morphic resonance - the recognition of existing patterns of information.

"You are no longer a consumer of a message. You become a carrier wave of the field"

I guess these are deep waters, but fascinating none the less. So today I feature Rupert at the Glastonbury Symposium of 2020, where he explains his theories:

(102 minutes)

Like / Dislike this

2025-06-24

Scott Ritter reviews the possibilities for peace, war, regime change in the wake of the Trump bombings of Iran.

"... nothing is guaranteed... we just don't know... we are in the middle of the fog of war... "

"... there is the opportunity for a grand bargain to be had here... "

Forty minutes of informed opinion, tinged with hope and a large measure of practicality.

(42 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2025-06-23

A relevant slant on the Trump attack on Iran's nuclear sites. He may just have driven the BRICS to close ranks around Iran.

I obviously don't know how matters will work out, but I wouldn't recommend anyone to move to Israel just now.

Ben also throws in some detail about why the Satanists are so keen to protect the ongoing war - if you are fighting a war then matters judicial take a back seat. Not for the faint of heart.

Oh, and prepare to question everything you thought you knew... the change just unleashed/unveiled (according to Ben) will rewrite global geopolitics from the ground up.

Modest subscription required for full access.

2025-06-23

Hard to argue with this analysis - the game has completely changed.

"Iran is not going to be allowed to lose - there will be no defeat of Iran"

Fifteen minutes of clarity.

(15 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2025-06-23

In this pre-bombing article from the LaRouche Organization, the allegedly central role of the British Empire is explored. 

It's all circumstantial of course - it's rare these days that the Empire shows its hand as openly as it did when Boris Johnson visited Ukraine to scupper the agreement negotiated between Vladimir and Volodymyr in the wake of Russia's special military operation.

But is the Empire still quietly up to its old tricks?

2025-06-23

Jacob Nordangård pulls a few strings together for us on the Bilderbergers and the Trilateral Commission, not to mention the G7 in Canada that Trump left early.

Regime change in Iran has long been an outstanding unfinished business for this group of technocrats, who need to bring the Iranian national bank under globalist control like everywhere else - after all, globalism demands control and manipulation of the money supply, enabling them to fund their tentacles legal and illegal alike as they please, so a major exception like Iran would be a rather large embarrassment, possibly even a fateful break in their web of control, already supposedly under serious attack in the US by the infamous Department of Government Efficiency.

So why exactly did Trump leave the G7 early?

2025-06-22

The Donald has bombed Iran's nuclear sites.

Do they even exist? The may or may not have done, but maybe they don't any more.

Scott Ritter is not amused.

"He bombed empty targets - which appears to be the most sage and wise decision of all, because now he has created at least the potential of a window of opportunity to disengage from the disaster he had created"

(6 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2025-06-21

Alex Krainer reminds us that Iran has an independent central bank...  and that has been the downfall of many other countries in the region - whatever the official excuse for war.

Much good sense in this video? It's your view that counts.

(13 minutes)

Watch this video here.

2025-06-21

Parliament to the rescue?

"A rarely used tool in the legal toolkit could force unconstitutional acts into the open"

So says Martin Geddes, who has asked his AI to unearth the legal routes by which possible illegal or unconstitutional court cases may be challenged.

Only for use when the legality of the proceedings is disputed.

2025-06-21

"Robin Hood" asserts that all Courts in the UK have been fraudulent ever since at least the 1990s and quite possibly earlier.

When our erstwhile monarchy signed us away into the EU, it thereby lost all the authority previously enjoyed, by failing to defend us against the imposition of rule by foreigners not bound by our ancient constitution.

Some might consider that "treason". 

But he asserts that Courts are anyway no longer "Crown Courts" ever since the Crown Officers were removed.

What we have now are Corporate Courts whose only authority is to mediate differences between Corporate entities under the Law of the Sea. As individual subjects of the monarchy living on the land, we don't come under the Corporate Law of the Sea.

So they bamboozle us with

2025-06-20

Scott Ritter reviews the state of hostilities.

It all hinges on America, so what will Trump do?

(68 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2025-06-20

John O'Looney is a funeral director from Milton Keynes, who was outspoken during the "Covid emergency" for his work in identifying novel "fibrous clots" in the bodies of the deceased that came his way.

Now he highlights some unexpected changes in the way that police handle sudden unexpected deaths, apparently (according to his local Coroner) as a result of new advice from the government about the requirements when dealing with those who have died suddenly. 

John is not impressed. See what you think:

(20 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video

2025-06-20

"Cash is king" for a reason, just demonstrated (allegedly - I'm not there!) in Teheran.

Due to the confrontation with Israel (again 'allegedly', although it does seem a reasonable assumption) banks are closed and no ATMs are functioning.

And no shops could accept "plastic money" - to get your groceries, fuel, and the day-to-day necessities of life, it's cash only.

And no internet means no access to crypto currency.

The banks being down doesn't automatically equate to the internet being down, so crypto transactions may work still - it just depends on the nature of the break in internet service.

"But above all, understand this: you will not be rescued. The system isn’t broken, it’s being replaced"

2025-06-19

Eugippius is a German commentator, but all of Europe including the UK suffers from the same stultifying political blight, all caused by certain topics being off-limits for discussion.

We all know what they are because if our political classes continue to pursue them in the same way as now, we will all be in the dustbin of civilisation when the lights go out - and trying to claw our way out of that bin will be between impossible and impracticable, because those who lead us are burning the bridges back to sanity, ie: the power-stations that can be proven to power the grid effectively are being shuttered.

No amount of wishful thinking will ever enable the intermittent renewables to reliably do the job. Nuclear is a good power source that can power a grid - but then renewables would be unnecessary! Nuclear as a back-up for intermittent renewables simply turns the economics on its head, since we would be paying the whole cost of nuclear for marginal benefit.

AI - a Tool, Not an Oracle

2025-06-19

In past times the law was essentially Common Law, codified by judges on the simple basis that life, health, and property (roughly in that order) were to be defended, that all were equal before the law, and that justice had to be seen to be done.

This was supplemented by agreements between government and the governed, including Magna Carta's various incarnations, and the Glorious Revolution of 1688 (and its Bill of Rights 1689).

David Starkey explained these admirably here.

We have now reached the stage where MPs, displaying no obvious interest in these protections, claim to legislate for women to kill their own babies for good

2025-06-18

Our legal system is a quagmire that few care to argue with because fundamentally, the fraud is so complex that it's impossible for most to navigate through such a maze of treachery, fraud and deception.

I stand in awe of those who challenge the system.

But does it have one or two points of weakness that if exploited can bring the whole house of cards down?

And what does Roman Law have to do with all this?

"We know that you are corrupt from head to toe"

(41 minutes)

Like / dislike this video

2025-06-18

Whatever you think of ICAN, their track record of holding American governments to account for medical evils is pretty good, and they do seem to be independent of questionable funding.

They must be getting bored with American targets because now they are taking aim at the UK government and ARIA (Advanced Research and Innovation Agency) that is currently innovating new ways to save the UK population from the terrible predations of that great ball of fire in the sky, the Sun.

Yes, we Brits have been geoengineering our chemtrails for years, but now we know who is doing it! Or if they are not actually doing it themselves, who is supposed to be guiding it. I'm guessing that they would subcontract the actual operations.

Read what ARIA has to say about "Future Proofing Our Climate and