Conspiracy Corner

2025-12-08

Plenty going on just now, although mostly behind the scenes. By the time the news catches up with events I'm guessing much will be over (bar the shouting).

Likewise in this era of global meltdown and multiple bluffs it's hard to differentiate fact from fiction, white hats from black hats. 

Still, it's an interesting report this week that confirms that events are moving faster than most can keep up with.

Modest subscription required for full access.

2025-12-07

It was called "Operation Talla" - but it could have been called "Three Wise Monkeys": Hear no evidence, See no evidence, Admit no evidence.

Search engines will tell you a lot about the Talla Reservoir near Tweedsmuir from 1905 or thereabouts, but haven't apparently caught up with the UK Police Operation Talla from 2021 onward.

Happily we can keep you up to date with the latest news from Ethical Approach UK, and retired (in name only!) policeman Mark Sexton, who have now published the results of their investigations.

This all started back in June 2021 when Mark Sexton went down to the local police station to report a crime.

We...

2025-12-07

Oh and gold. Gold being a monetary metal whose supply is approximately constant.

Unlike dollars and pounds that can be printed in quantity by a few strokes on a central banker's keyboard. If we produced money like that they would lock us up, so how is it "OK" for central banks (oh, and retail banks too!) to do it?

Maybe it's not what you know, but who you know? And who doesn't know?

As always, this is not financial advice. It's how the world works...

(77 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video

2025-12-07

And not before time.

It has always baffled me how anybody could be so dumb as to believe in the CO₂ demon when the said demon accounts for such a tiny proportion of our current atmosphere, and when each of the much-foretold climate disasters reliably fail to occur - the only reasonable explanation seems to be that the climate catastrophists are in fact cult members for whom the slavish devotion to cult dogma is their prerequisite for self-referential meaning.

Maybe we can now get back to saving the world from the climate cultists by "Drilling Baby, Drilling" and actually burning the resulting gas and oil so that we can keep warm again. Let's hope it's not too late.

Speaking of that unfamiliar "warm", we shouldn't forget that hot baths, ideally taken long and leisurely before bed (particularly laced with a healthy dose of sea salt, or Epsom salts (for the magnesium in

2025-12-05

Well, if we want to talk about it, we need the words.

Martin Geddes aided and abetted by his automated assistants Grok and ChatGpt comes up with the goods:

2025-12-04

We are familiar with the the term "false flag" - something happens in such a way that it is attributed to someone or some grouping that wasn't actually involved.

It's a straight deception, originating in naval battle where an attacking force flies a flag other than its own in order to elude culpability.

In these more sophisticated days it is often associated (so some conspiracy theorists might aver) with a need to influence public opinion to accept a course of action to which they would not otherwise consent.

Such as war.

Martin Geddes has a slightly but significantly different problem with his legal battles to try to establish the validity of the operations of our current system of justice.

Mark Sexton would seem to be running up against a

2025-12-03

Graham Moore Unleashed.

Watch and take note.

This is the third of three parts. See the links for parts 1 and 2.

It's a lot to get one's head around, and it covers a lot of ground, so take it slowly. 

(68 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video there.

2025-12-03

General Zhang - in charge of the PLA - seems to be out of the headlines - but perhaps his activities should have merited a headline?

Meanwhile, what is President Xi up to?

As always in China, it's the details that tell the story... 

And... what was really behind the events in Tiananmen Square in 1989?

(61 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2025-12-03

Of course this is all groundless speculation, little better than conspiracy theory, so just skip over it...

(38 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2025-12-03

We are used to any number of politicos talking nonsense, so it's notable when somebody stands up and refutes the narrative.

Of course nobody has to listen to such denialism (despite we have been force-fed the Fabian utopianism for ever) but the truth will out, regardless of political labelism.

So it falls to the GWPF to give us another penetrating glimpse of the obvious, and it's a necessary exercise, before the global warming cult drives the nation into irreversible failure. 

(40 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video

2025-12-02

As somebody who faced my mid-life health crisis, and recovered (eventually) through my own efforts and appropriate dietary updates,I am happy to bang the drum for Clive de Carle, here interviewed by Neil Oliver. If you have been grappling with an obstinate condition that has defied conventional treatment, then listen up.

And if you are young and lucky enough to still be in working order and carefree of diet, watch it anyway, because we are all aging (for now) and forewarned is forearmed...

... and stand by for a novel method of motivating your doctor!

(64 minutes)

Will Nobody (else) Unfreeze Those Pesky Russian Assets?

2025-12-01

Given that everything that we read in the press or on social media is potentially corrupted, making sense of what we read is become a fool's errand.

The late great Robert David Steele used to say that nearly everything we need to know can be obtained through "open source" intelligence, and the only source that he thought worth his paying for was Benjamin Fulford. In that spirit we feature Benjamin's reports even though he appears now to be not so independent as before, since he now publishes under the branding of the White Dragon Society, and his various contacts in other organisations will tell him whatever they want him to tell us.

So we must bear in mind that he isn't necessarily as independent a journalist as he used to be, and his output should be judged in that light.

Take for example the "tale of two Trumps". It looks persuasive, but the abilities of even the most consummate administration to coordinate the activities of two competing Trumps

2025-12-01

What's the difference between a regulator and an enabler?

Quite a few regulators seem to have trouble differentiating, as Tom Wheeler so ably demonstrated in this pre-Covid video.

Has anything changed?

Well, the names in the frame may have changed but little else.

:"... the FCC has never met a regulation it couldn’t sidestep or ignore, and that certainly won’t be changing anytime soon"

Ah, but the Yanks do things their way. So is the rest of the world

2025-11-26

First up, a plea from Mark Attwood to those NHS and other medical staff who now realise that maybe, just maybe, inoculating the public at large with novel medical technology that

• had been developed "at warp speed" within months whilst earlier vaccines had required years of testing,
• had not been approved for general use except under an Emergency Use Authorisation,
• to allegedly defend against the "emergency" of a deadly "pandemic" that had no statistically significant effect upon the normally expected rate of "deaths from all causes", 
• which overwhelmingly "killed" people with comorbidities at around their expected lifespan, and  had no measurable effect on children who were nevertheless inoculated anyway,
• which was administered without any pretence at "informed consent", and indeed for some people under

2025-11-26

... cooler temperatures. If it keeps going like this the sea ice will soon be threatening UK shores in winter. Well it's true that "soon" is a term relative to the period under consideration, so maybe in a million years or so.

CDN has the news, grab it whilst it's hot!

2025-11-26

The NHS is showing its "progressive" tendencies.

Despite the many good people still trying to make this unstable top-heavy unaccountable progressivistic leviathan work for our benefit, its leadership is myopic, management is treated as a specialism in its own right and thus populated by expert managers, and the stench of rank stupidity has become intolerable.

Other than that the NHS is wonderful of course and we wouldn't have it any other way...

2025-11-26

The administrative government, seemingly oblivious to the constitutional need for our citizens to be judged by a "jury of our peers", now proposes, in order to cut the administrative backlog now denying justice to criminals and victims alike, to abolish the right to a jury for "non-serious" offences.

Magna Carta? What's that? How old-fashioned! We need to be modern, and grasp the benefits that modernity offers! Who would not want justice delivered promptly and without fear? Ancient and outdated tradition must not be permitted to stand in the way of progress!

This is how the ignorant and the mendacious want to convince us to abandon what remains of our Constitution so that they may better rule the people by decree. No matter that it is the people themselves who were sovereign, have always been sovereign, still are sovereign, and will always be sovereign unless and until they give up their sovereignty for the

2025-11-25

This is dangerous territory, so before plunging in, if you have not already, please read Down the Rabbit Hole 1 wherein I attempt to justify taking a critical look at topics which many will find controversial.

Here someone else takes a look at early Christianity (upon which topic the brainwashing has had at least two millennia to get going). He's obviously done a lot more work on this than I have, so I'm very happy to concede the leadership on this one.

But first, to get ourselves into the mood...

Do we believe that the Bible as we know it today is the uncorrupted Word of God?

Do we think we know the origins of the Church of England?

Or the foundation of Christianity in Rome after the

2025-11-25

Yes, Martin Geddes has been up to his illuminations of matters legal and lawful, in terms that I would wager most of us could comprehend.

If we were asked to attend court and found ourselves "had up" before the head teacher in the local secondary school, we might begin to question the genuineness not only of the proceedings but also of those conducting the proceedings.

"When is a 'Court' not a Court?" would be a relevant question, and the Head Teacher should have some explaining to do.

Still, if instead we had attended in a building labelled as a "Court" and been confronted by somebody professing to be a magistrate, would anybody dare to question the legitimacy of the situation? Yet the overwhelming likelihood of just accepting the given as legitimate surely is an open invitation for fraudsters to take advantage? Even unwitting fraudsters who themselves had not validated their higher authority?