Legal

2025-06-21

Parliament to the rescue?

"A rarely used tool in the legal toolkit could force unconstitutional acts into the open"

So says Martin Geddes, who has asked his AI to unearth the legal routes by which possible illegal or unconstitutional court cases may be challenged.

Only for use when the legality of the proceedings is disputed.

2025-06-21

"Robin Hood" asserts that all Courts in the UK have been fraudulent ever since at least the 1990s and quite possibly earlier.

When our erstwhile monarchy signed us away into the EU, it thereby lost all the authority previously enjoyed, by failing to defend us against the imposition of rule by foreigners not bound by our ancient constitution.

Some might consider that "treason". 

But he asserts that Courts are anyway no longer "Crown Courts" ever since the Crown Officers were removed.

What we have now are Corporate Courts whose only authority is to mediate differences between Corporate entities under the Law of the Sea. As individual subjects of the monarchy living on the land, we don't come under the Corporate Law of the Sea.

So they bamboozle us with

2025-06-20

John O'Looney is a funeral director from Milton Keynes, who was outspoken during the "Covid emergency" for his work in identifying novel "fibrous clots" in the bodies of the deceased that came his way.

Now he highlights some unexpected changes in the way that police handle sudden unexpected deaths, apparently (according to his local Coroner) as a result of new advice from the government about the requirements when dealing with those who have died suddenly. 

John is not impressed. See what you think:

(20 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video

2025-06-19

In past times the law was essentially Common Law, codified by judges on the simple basis that life, health, and property (roughly in that order) were to be defended, that all were equal before the law, and that justice had to be seen to be done.

This was supplemented by agreements between government and the governed, including Magna Carta's various incarnations, and the Glorious Revolution of 1688 (and its Bill of Rights 1689).

David Starkey explained these admirably here.

We have now reached the stage where MPs, displaying no obvious interest in these protections, claim to legislate for women to kill their own babies for good

2025-06-18

Our legal system is a quagmire that few care to argue with because fundamentally, the fraud is so complex that it's impossible for most to navigate through such a maze of treachery, fraud and deception.

I stand in awe of those who challenge the system.

But does it have one or two points of weakness that if exploited can bring the whole house of cards down?

And what does Roman Law have to do with all this?

"We know that you are corrupt from head to toe"

(41 minutes)

Like / dislike this video

2025-06-16

In what is widely seen as welcome U-Turn, there is to be a much-demanded national enquiry into grooming gangs.

Could there possibly be a better way of taking the heat off the government on this topic?

And given the extraordinary success of the UK Covid Enquiry in ignoring all the uncomfortable questions and sweeping the whole operation into the long grass of life-threatening tedium, who better to lead this new exercise in self-exculpation than Baroness Hallett?

The Daily Sceptic reports.

2025-06-14

"In this case I have no care whatsoever whether my driving penalty points and fine are overturned; it has zero importance to me. What matters is that insiders within the system become aware of the abuse they have become enmeshed in, and the risks is poses to them personally"

The indefatigable Martin Geddes (assisted by his AI) writes yet another dissertation about the justice system as it operates in this country, this time addressed to those who work within its confines.

You know who you are!

(see also The Trial from Appleby Horse Fair for background information)

(for those unfamiliar with Q - ...

2025-06-12

Well, the trial of Martin Geddes at "North and West Cumbria Magistrates’ Court (1752)"is over.

Read his report.

A legal phantom creates real liabilities

2025-06-11

Neil McCoy-Ward delivers this in an admirably restrained manner despite the utterly unacceptable government overreach that he is announcing.

Do not adjust your device, but feel free to adjust your MP in an appropriately civilised and parliamentary manner.

(32 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2025-06-10

In pursuing his claim against the UK justice system, Martin Geddes has documented the case(exhaustively!) and submitted it to the High Court in London as a request for Judicial Review.

The High Court is not amused.

Martin's AI is not amused.

Support him tomorrow at "Carlisle Magistrates Court".

2025-06-09

Fresh from Tennessee he will be at "Carlisle Magistrates Court" 9:30am Wednesday.

He is asserting his right to be tried in a real Court of Law - and not as he alleges in a fake Court which has neither legal authority nor even existence. This is as surreal as unreal gets.

The story so far.

"They are running unauthorised courts in broad daylight and hoping nobody notices"

The Wednesday event.

2025-06-05

Continuing on from his impromptu crowd-fund...

Martin shares another update from the Family Court Case in North Carolina / Tennessee.

2025-05-31

This must be one of the best documented legal cases ever - and all over a parking problem!

The Challenge to the Judicial Reality - Do you exist? By what right do you charge me? 

How can we even ask the question? (You just have to be Martin Geddes)

The Story So Far

Almost within Striking Distance (from half-way around the world)

2025-06-03

What is

2025-05-28

Yes, it's Martin Geddes again, rehearsing his case for Judicial Review at the High Court.

We have featured it before and may do so again, as he does it not for himself, but for all of us. He's probably the only man in the UK with the knowledge, the dedication, and the motivation to attempt such a feat. 

If the High Court slaps him down, we will have proof that justice is no longer obtainable in the UK.

Would that be grounds for revolution?  

2025-05-27

Taxes unlawful?

Whatever happened to "nothing is certain except death and taxes"?

Still, if the Bernician is correct (and that's where I would put my money), the Brexit-in-name-only crew in our "mother of parliaments" have perpetrated a massive screw-up which might bankrupt the government. Furthermore...

"... EVERY new tax created by the UK government and every increase in the percentage of income / capital taxed that wasn’t enabled by primary legislation or prerogative power before 1972 is a nullity at law, in the absence it being EU-derived legislation"

"Fiat justitia ruat caelum" could be

2025-05-24

If you're on a roll, keep rollin'.

Martin Geddes is scrambling to push his application for Judicial Review to the High Court as Litigant in Person on time, whilst simultaneously involved in a complex legal case in the US.

It's the UK case that prompts his update this week.

If the SAS ever need a legal beagle, then I suggest he is attempting the legal equivalent of the SAS entry course, with consequences that no man may foresee... but happily, he has A I to back him up and do much of the detailed heavy lifting required.

Onward and upward!

2025-05-24

A film by Mikki Willis about the trial of medical researcher and outspoken Big Pharma critic Dr. Robert Young, whose father Dr Robert O. Young wrote books about how to maintain good health.

In fact, one of his books - "The pH Miracle" - was instrumental in my own recovery from eating carelessly... when we are young we can eat whatever we feel like and we can get away with it, but when we get older our body's need for good nutrition at some point becomes critical, and we can no longer eat carelessly. The pH Miracle set me on the right path to recovery (urticaria + middle-age spread since you ask) and I have never looked back.

I believe it's true to say that most don't understand that the body needs to maintain its alkalinity, and to that end it will strip the nutrients it needs from its very bones if necessary. But if we eat the right foods that support alkalinity in balance with those

2025-05-23

Interest of Justice addresses the FDA's VRBPAC (Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee) May 2025 meeting.

"... all 'regulators' (who forgot to regulate safety) are not going to give up the cash cow easily - it’s rigged and the FDA VRBPAC meeting today May 22, 2025 was to justify more covid 'vaccines', not slow them down or stop them"

(Watch the whole 7 hour meeting here 😎)

Read their report here.

"Today, I am putting you on notice: you have a legal, ethical, and personal duty to act"

Watch the section covering the IOJ presentation below.

(4

2025-05-23

Is A I all it's cracked up to be?

Certainly Martin Geddes believes it to be very useful in making sense of legal issues, where exhaustive searches of legal precedent (or even merely of the Statute Book!) are beyond the reach of most.

And yet... on the other side, there are those who believe that an AI that eliminates the need for people to work in their traditional employment may not be in the interests of the population at large.

The Luddites thought similarly when factories introduced automation to handle jobs previously undertaken by humans, but if they had had their way, modern man would look and live much like pre-automation man and thelabour-saving technology that today

2025-05-21

There are days when I seriously wonder how Martin Geddes finds the time to do all that he does across two jurisdictions as well as produce more articles than I can keep up with.

This is his latest update on the UK Courts (real or fictional?) situation, which is about to hit the High Court as an application for judicial review.

The silence from his accusers is golden in so far as it provides him with the evidence upon which his next legal move will be based - although I suspect that it's unlikely to do his personal finances much good.

It's a nuanced situation, since if the purported Court isn't a real Court then what is to stop the High Court from saying that it's nothing to do with them, and passing it on to the alleged miscreants at Cumbria Police to investigate?

This could run and run