Legal

2026-05-04

Reiner Fuellmich is no stranger to this site.

In collaboration with the Corona Investigative Committee which he jointly led, he interviewed many experts from around the world who dissented from the Covid narrative put out by the global governments.

The result - the Covid Court of Public Opinion, which took the form of a Grand Jury, with the whole world's public as the jury.

We covered it all:

Grand Jury - The Covid Court of Public

2026-05-04

Do try to keep up...

(4 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

View our reporting here.

2026-05-02

With the latest rebuttal by the High Court of Martin's efforts to secure legal clarification, he does what any good IT specialist would - he thinks bigger, and broadens the space of enquiry to encompass the larger factors at play, the factors that include the assumptions that underlie the broken nature of the system under scrutiny.

He has already done this at least once, when he broadened the scope of enquiry to include not just the legal traceability of the judicial authority imposed, but also to include the effect of the specific administrative procedures used to enforce the judicial authority.

Now the scope of enquiry is advancing once more, to examine not merely these aspects of the judicial systems, but the operations of government departments in general, of which Justice is simply one (albeit a rather important one).

...

2026-05-02

Is this the end of the road?

Following on from Martin's briefing on his application to the High Court, he has a result, which (loosely translated) amounts to "Don't bother us with your Tom-fool legal arguments, we don't deign to reply".

But what did we expect?

An alternative explanation might be "We know this is not constitutionally satisfactory, but we don't care and we admit nothing". 

Or it might be "Your case is important to us, but we have neither time nor inclination to hear it when the football's on telly".

"My personal sense of the matter is that I have hit a raw nerve"

...

2026-04-26

The "finale" - parts 6 and 7 combined into one.

"Citizen Petition Series, Parts 6&7 combined — Docket FDA-2025-P-1807 (click to open the public docket)"

"Schools do not teach that the Nuremberg Code is American law. Mainstream media did not cover Annas’s 1991 paper when it predicted exactly this scenario. Public health officials did not quote the first principle when they were rolling out mandates. They could not have, because their actions contradicted it"

Interest of Justice explain why the whole Covid operation was illegal under American law, and how the authorities contrived to ignore it.

"This week IoJ files a federal writ of mandamus in the U.S. District Court for the

2026-04-25

Operation Talla was perhaps the first and likely the most consequential national policing "guidance" issued across the constituent nations of the UK.

Have the various police forces across the UK ever previously be issued "guidance" to reject complaints of alleged criminality about a specific topic close to the government's heart?

We have been led to believe that similar activity happened under dictatorships such as the Soviet Union, Mao's Chiina, The Kim dynasty's North Korea, and Pol Pot's Cambodia, but is it happening in our own UK, ancient Albion?

Ian Clayton of Ethical Approach UK sums up what he has painstakingly documented over the past years.

And why now?

2026-04-24

When the electricity is connected, the lights work.

So it is with some anticipation that Martin Geddes' friend looks forward to the future.

Will it happen before Christmas?

2026-04-24

Part 5 of Interest of Justice petition to the FDA (The Undisclosed DNA Problem) to explain the highly irregular Covid-19 vaccination programmes.

"Citizen Petition Series, Part 5 of 7 — Docket FDA-2025-P-1807 (click to open the public docket)"

See the full series here, starting with Part 1.

2026/04/23

Part 4 of Interest of Justice petition to the FDA (The Warp Speed Authority Problem) to explain the highly irregular Covid-19 vaccination programmes.

"Citizen Petition Series, Part 4 of 7 — Docket FDA-2025-P-1807 (click to open the public docket)"

See the full series here, starting with Part 1.

2026-04-21

It has been a long and winding road from Appleby Horse Fair to the High Court.

The background.

Martin now takes his assertion to the High Court, having previously exhausted other avenues in his search for clarification of the basic legality of the "Court" that sought to try his original "offence".

Sounds simple enough, but answers forthcoming have there been none.

In ordinary parlance, one might say that he has been given the run-around at every turn.

Will this time be different?

2026-04-21

Part 3 of Interest of Justice petition to the FDA (the DoD problem) to explain the highly irregular Covid-19 vaccination programmes.

"Citizen Petition Series, Part 3 of 7 — Docket FDA-2025-P-1807 (click to open the public docket)"

See the full series here, starting with Part 1.

2026-04-21

Part 2 of Interest of Justice petition to the FDA (the Gene Therapy problem) to explain the highly irregular Covid-19 vaccination programmes.

"Citizen Petition Series, Part 2 of 7 — Docket FDA-2025-P-1807 (click to open the public docket)"

See the full series here, starting with Part 1.

2026-04-21

Interest of Justice have petitioned the FDA to explain themselves with regard to the apparently highly irregular Covid-19 "vaccination" programmes.

The FDA response is already well outside the legal time limit of 180 days, and IoJ is going public.

"Citizen Petition FDA-2025-P-1807 is not a normal citizen petition."

The FDA requires every concern to be submitted within a single filing...   so that is what IoJ submitted.

"Most citizen petitions at FDA run five to fifteen pages. This one runs well over one hundred and thirty pages of primary filing"

Don't worry, this article doesn't cover the whole thing - IoJ has split the story into seven parts for publication. 

2026-04-20

Before we begin, I offer the standard "Down the Rabbit Hole" introductory advice for those unfamiliar:

I strongly suggest that those new to my site should review the earlier Down the Rabbit Hole series, starting with 1 2 3 and 4. 

That said, let's dive in.

There is a growing body of people who suspect or believe that the current geopolitical and national

2026-04-17

It's been a long time in gestation, ever since the UN became the political arm of the WEF and its Big Pharma "charitable foundations" contributors - by amazing coincidence just in time for the Covid-19 "pandemic"!

Now that everybody has been asleep for the last few years, tired of the brain-numbing pedantry of those who would remotely rule over us from the commanding heights of the United Nations global government without the least shred of accountability, the WHO has contrived to confirm the IHR Amendments and the Pandemic Treaty (not to mention the PABS deal) and thus to gain all necessary powers to impose another pandemic at the sole behest of their Director General, one ever-reliable 

Is There Any Regulator That Isn't Captured by The Industry Supposedly Regulated?

2026-04-11

Safely Mapping the derivation / attribution of Institutional Authority, to identify the conditions under which Institutional Authority can be said to exist, terminate, and remain accountable.

Martin Geddes cut his analysis teeth in IT - the unforgiving logic of computers and computer networks - and now applies the same skills to analysis of how our justice systems - or any system that claims institutional authority - actually measure up under formal analysis.

Over to Martin... 

... And how they may not...

2026-04-03

"Analyses of administrative expansion, technocratic governance, and the erosion of public trust have converged toward a common diagnosis: institutions continue to function, yet their capacity to respond meaningfully to criticism appears to be weakening"

"Closure: a structural state in which institutions maintain the forms of responsiveness while losing the substance of correction"

I feel that Martin Geddes might agree. 

"This condition is not exceptional. It is increasingly observable across a range of Western institutions, including universities, regulatory bodies, and public administrations, where procedural activity coexists with a growing inability to adjust to feedback"

2026-04-02

William Keyte has made it his business to investigate our Constitution, which the Powers that Be have come close to denying exists, let alone publishing its existence and ensuring that at least our law officers understand and respect it. 

In fact, everybody should be educated in it and understand its imports, since it is the bedrock upon which our lawful legal system should be founded. Sadly, it doesn't always seem to be so.

Anyone might think that they want us to forget about it, and to think that Parliament is "sovereign" in this land... or maybe the EU, or the UN, or the WEF, the list goes on.

So who exactly is "sovereign"? Monarchy, Parliament, Judiciary, or the People?

William has set up a couple of websites about the foundations of our legal system.:

2026-04-02

The Bailiff Cometh (with apologies to the Gasman)
"Twas on the Monday morning that the bailiff came to call... "

Firstly, ask for their name , address, and whom they represent. You will need this.

1. Establish your ground - literally:
   "I am giving you verbal notice that I have withdrawn your implied right of access to this property, you are now a trespasser, please leave immediately"
   
   
2. "Before we proceed, I need to establish your jurisdiction. Are you acting as a public servant, or a private contractor for a corporation?" (or other legal entity)
   
   
3. "I require the original wet ink signature on that