2021-09-16

Dr Fuellmich is probably the pre-eminent Covid lawyer world-wide, who formed the Corona Investigative Committee in Germany soon after the pandemic started.

Since then they have been painstakingly collecting and marshalling the evidence from around the world that the pandemic may not be all that it has been cracked up to be.

Here is the latest interview brought to us by Mike Adams of Brighteon:

"... we have come to the conclusion... that these are crimes against humanity, probably the worst ever committed..."

"... in my view it's turning already..."

"... they raided the offices of the judge who simply did his job... "

(one hour)

2021-09-11

Law or Fiction report that hey have been instructed to challenge the vaccine roll-out to healthy children.

"... the Judge initially considering the papers has for the time being refused the application for a hearing to consider pausing the roll out. The legal team has filed an urgent application to the Court to reconsider that decision"

"The documents ... expose some of the important information not widely known or reported in the mainstream media"

Read the report. This includes the documents referred to above.

2021-09-10

Common Law is something we should all know more about, and is something that was bequeathed to many former colonies of the British Empire, in that upon independence they chose to continue that legal system.

So now the citizens of the mother country are also being urged to understand our legal inheritance! It isn't something we can take for granted - we have to qualify for it.

Visit Peter Stone's web-site for more information. You my wish to bookmark it.

"If you truly want to be free then you must take it, you cannot wait for someone to give it to you"

2021-09-09

The Power of Common Law, of personal resolution not to be intimidated:

Like / Dislike this video here.

2021-09-08

This success story well illustrates the truth that incessant propaganda over many years can lead even the finest lawyerly minds to join the most dubious of band-wagons.

Of course if

(a) you believe the hype about the "settled" nature of probably the most complex science known to man (settled according to the many climate science models, which inevitably perform exactly according to the wishes of their designers - we have explored how models may not be science elsewhere) and

(b) that legal coercion is an acceptable way to enforce an entirely political agenda, 

then you will share the delight of the climate zealots who still believe that our world will become uninhabitable unless we turn off all the facilities that enable civilisation, and do it now.

Those of us who do not suffer from the delusion that governments can invariably be trusted to get the most major of policy decisions right (when they so obviously cannot even get the small ones right) may take a different view.

In the end, the only way to safeguard against the overbearing power of any government is to defer to the collective wisdom

2021-09-05

The JCVI has come out against the unrestricted jabbing of 12-15 yr olds, but the intention is clear for the 16 and 17 yr age groups and the Government has instructed Chris Whitty et al to come up with some reason for over-ruling the JCVI on 12 - 15 yrs.

Anna has something to say about inoculating these age groups:

"Silence is a war crime"...

"... there's no way that any child up to the age of... 18 can be considered to be Gillick Competent" (to give informed consent):

2021-09-01

In the public understanding, the BioNTech vaccine is the one for which Pfizer has an Emergency Use Authorisation. 

In the legal understanding, is that actually the case? It appear that it may not be.

In the real world is it physically the case? This may not be clear-cut either!

Technocracy News digs up the drains beneath this FDA "approval" and explains their understanding of what is going on here, and why.

I have to say it's one of the most complete analyses that I have seen. It's necessarily fairly complex but that comes with the territory.

Although the FDA decision has generate much confusion, it may not have generated enough, and many may be unaware that the legal implications are not the same and legally the current Pfizer product with the EUA does not carry the same legal terms and conditions as the BioNTech Comirnaty product (which is not yet available).

Besides all that, the trials which underpin these products are incomplete and in many respects inadequate to demonstrate safety in the areas of usage now anticipated:

"the idea that the FDA is even considering approving the shot for children as young as 12 — and are running trials on babies — is completely incomprehensible"

Given that various bodies are keen to mandate "the vaccine" for employees and

2021-09-01

Technocracy News publishes a report that seems to have eluded the mainstream western press.

The Indian Bar Association has taken the bull by the horns, suing the WHO Chief Scientist Dr Soumya Swaminathan "accusing her ... of causing the deaths of Indian citizens by misleading them about Ivermectin".

This is the first legal action that I am aware of that takes any authority to task for suppression of prophylactic treatments for Covid-19. 

Perhaps it will be the first of many.

Read the full report.

Note also the subsequent legal notice (download) of 13 June 2021 "for Contempt served upon to Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus and Dr. Sunil Kumar"

"Contempt of Court and aggravated offences against humanity by spreading disinformation about the drug ‘Ivermectin’, despite having full knowledge of the Judgment passed by the Hon’ble High Court of

2021-08-31

Many organisations are now set on mandating Covid jabs for employees, and the government seems set on requiring them for schoolchildren.

In my opinion, the notion of jabbing children with these experimental inoculations which have only emergency authorisation amounts to a criminal act on many counts:

1. These vaccinations have unknown long-term safety profiles
   
   
2. There is no current emergency that justifies their use for this purpose under the existing EAUs
   
   
3. Children are at no significant risk from Covid-19
   
   
4. Vaccination may not prevent onward transmission of the virus by the vaccinated - indeed it may enable the vaccinated to harbour larger concentrations of the virus whilst remaining asymptomatic
   
   
5. Children are at demonstrable risk from the vaccines, even if the MHRA are criminally negligent in not following up their yellow card reports to establish and publish the true extent of that risk
   
   
6. In the absence of such follow-up by the MHRA, how can the principle of "informed consent" be respected? The data is available to the MHRA but the analysis is not publicly available to those who are to be vaccinated
   
   
7. There is scant serious evidence that adults are at significant risk from children passing

2021-08-30

The Daily Sceptic reports today on a legal development in Portugal.

Judge Files Complaint Against Portuguese Government For its ‘Criminal’ Mismanagement of the Covid Crisis

If you can read Portuguese then you can visit the original article for the link to the original PDF file.

If you can't read Portuguese then just for our readers, here is an English translation of that PDF file.

Don't say I don't look after you .

This is a comprehensive complaint dealing with a large number of issues of illegality.

Readers may remember that Portugal has form in challenging the global Covid narrative. It will be interesting to see how far this new complaint goes and whether it gains any traction within a sensible timeframe.

2021-08-26

The application for a new inquest is supported by evidence that was not heard at the original inquest.

Briefly, it includes evidence that the twin towers were not brought down by the impact of aircraft and the subsequent fires, but by "the use of explosives and incendiaries".

This is clearly a momentous claim that would have enormous political ramifications if proven.

Incidentally, the 20 year anniversary of 9/11 arrives imminently, in September 2021.

Read the full report at Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth.

We await the result of this application with interest.

2021-08-23

The BBC reports that the FDA has granted full approval to the Pfizer Covid-19 "vaccine" for use in the United States for those aged 16 and over.

"The vaccine, which will now be marketed as Comirnaty, was found to be 91% effective in preventing Covid disease"

How that squares with the multiple conflicting reports that the vaccine may not protect from infection is a nuance that may evade many.

ICAN (Informed Consent Action Network) notes that

"The emergency use authorizations [download] for the COVID-19 vaccines require that providers of the vaccines report all COVID-19 cases in vaccinated individuals who get COVID-19 and are hospitalized or die. Healthcare professionals have reported to ICAN, stating in no uncertain terms, that this is not happening"

and believes that 

"It seems incredibly misleading to tell the country that all hospitalizations and deaths are in the unvaccinated when the CDC itself does not appear to be capturing or analyzing data to support that assertion"

Update - Additional claim made to the International Criminal Court for crime of Genocide against UK Government

2021-08-14

In this long-running case (we reported on it in January 2021) CHD and the EHT argued that the FCC had acted perversely and illegally in not updating their safety limits for EMF radiation (cell towers, wi-fi etc) to take account of more recently available evidence that such radiation can cause adverse health effects at limits far below the set guidelines.

"The court ruled that the FCC failed to consider the non-cancer evidence regarding adverse health effects of wireless technology when it decided that its 1996 radio frequency emission guidelines protect the public’s health"

“…the FCC completely failed to acknowledge, let alone respond to, comments concerning the impact of RF radiation on the environment…The record contains substantive evidence of potential environmental harms”

"CHD’s case was consolidated with another similar case that was filed by the Environmental Health Trust. The organizations filed joint briefs in the case"

Magna Carta - Britain's Gift to The World?

2021-08-07

"The truth will set us all free"

"We the People have to stand up"

This is an American viewpoint but it applies every bit as much in the UK.

These are hard truths that many may feel extremely uncomfortable even listening to - but the downside risk if we get this wrong may be higher than we have seen in all our post-war generations.

Watching and facing up these unpalatable allegations, there is much to consider - but one thing stands out - this is no longer merely politics-as-usual, nor can it be dismissed as "conspiracy theory" when many lawyers are actively working on its several aspects internationally.

"... if you're an elected official... if you're a governor you've got an entire state health department, and the only way that you're not aware that ... you're killing people with this vaccine is if you are purposely looking away from it... it doesn't take any effort to find the truth... "

I might add that if you have the entire resources of Public Health England the NHS and the ONS available to you, then the same logic applies.

There are a lot of home truths here - take your time.

  

2021-08-05

Court victory reported in Alberta Canada - defendant forces admission that there is no scientific proof that Co*id exists in the real world - the beginning of the end?

Hot on the heels of this news comes this from the Pulse:

Alberta Abandons Mask Mandates, Testing & Isolation Requirements