2024-07-02
" ... my written testimony submitted to Congress explaining why it was sheer folly to think that the Covid-19 vaccines were going to be properly safety tested before or after licensure"
Many acres of internet pages have by now been written by many and various authors devoted to all manner of theories about how the Covid jabs were developed, approved, marketed and distributed. This is but the latest in a long line, but it takes as its baseline the traditional notion that the usual regulatory bodies, that normally regulate vaccines and pharmaceutical products, were similarly responsible for the Covid products (other authors may disagree).
Even so, it is still damning.
In fact, it seems to be a dreadful litany of failure to protect the public at every conceivable level.
Of course, this is all perfectly understandable if we assume that the regulatory authorities involved are simply irredeemably incompetent, or merely having a great many bad days.
It is also perfectly understandable if we assume that they are actually working for the pharmaceutical companies (or other agencies) against the interests of the public.
One of the functions of the courts is surely to determine which of these scenarios applies, but perhaps the public would be wise to come to their own self-defence by taking appropriate measures to avoid such products if they feel that they may be unsafe for any reason.
