Censorship

2024-04-26

Investigate Europe is a "cross-border team of reporters, editors and producers... delivers in-depth investigative journalism from a changing Europe. Our reporting shines a light on the untold stories, unchecked institutions and hidden structures shaping the continent today".

So it has come to pass that they now shine their "light" upon the resurgent "far right" of rural communities across the EU who disagree with the major themes of the day as promoted by the official leaders of the Union. A worthy cause no doubt, yet the report somehow seems to avoid any contact with the specific issues that may lie behind this regrettable resurgence of support for "far right" parties.

We have featured articles from Investigate Europe before, when their reporting did seem to be interesting and informative.

2024-04-20

Israel/Gaza/Iran, Julian Assange, American imperialism, Israeli influence, etc etc.

A wide-ranging review of today's ills, and how we got here.

(80 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2024-04-20

Richard Vobes investigates... the worst type of corruption.

This needs to be investigated and heard in open court so that justice can be seen to be done. It is intolerable in a civilised society that such accusations can be left to fester unaddressed.

(57 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2024-04-16

"If you would know who controls you see who you may not criticise" -Tacitus

(16 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2024-04-07

Readers unfamiliar with our "Down the Rabbit Hole" series may like to view some of the earlier articles here, starting with nbr 1. Many may consider these propositions extreme, but the question is, can they be disproved?

Could they be possible, and if so, what would be the implications? 

If the implications would be trivial, then who cares? But if they would be earth-shaking, perhaps we should take note.

That said, the ancient writings such as the Bible certainly do exist, and some have been translated.

"Today we are living in a... time of awakening. It is called the morning of Swaroga and it has been happening since 2012"

2024-04-02

Martin Geddes has been to Bonnie Scotland (well, Edinburgh) again, this time to report on the protests about Humza Yousaf, now First Minister of Scotland and widely associated with a recent innovation in Scottish Law that some feel may hamper "free speech" in Scotland. 

It's a cracking report, with a goodly selection of placards that survived the wet weather remarkably well. I defy you to keep a straight face!

I also think that the lessons he draws are very pertinent:

"If you accept one lie as truth, it will be leveraged to allow any deception to become doctrine"

Enjoy the show!

2024-04-01

Free speech used to be taken for granted, thanks in large part to sensible legal precedents set by sensible judges in times past, who opined that the right to speak only without offending was not worth having. Now a quick internet search for "the right to speak only without offending was not worth having" pulls up a myriad of articles about how to speak without causing offence, but none about the status quo ante, so far has the needle been pushed away from previous precedent.

And yet, whilst offence may or may not be "offered", it doesn't instantiate unless "taken" - and these days it doesn't even have to be offered to be taken, it can be taken anyway. Therefore in principle, the party that "gives" offence isn't able to judge whether or not "offence" will be taken. One can guess, but one cannot be reasonably sure either way.

...

2024-03-19

"I remember 25, 30 years ago we used to point to the BBC as the counterpoint to the biased and propagandistic US media, I would say now the BBC is as bad as any... "

"... that means that these propaganda narratives may be more pervasive than ever, but I think they are more mistrusted and disdained than ever as well... "

Chris Hedges interviews Ali Abuminah, "a Palestinian-American journalist and the co-founder of The Electronic Intifada".

This initially impresses as being as dry as dust, but actually it's a pretty clear exposition of how propaganda has progressively swamped actual news journalism over recent times, to the point now where independent journalism has been comprehensively banished from mainstream media outlets. Stick with it, and hear the ways in which media manipulation is used to frame public opinion being coolly and meticulously dissected.

"The media has become a far

2024-02-10

If you watched the Putin interview, then what you got primarily was Vladimir Putin. That was as it should be.

So to redress the balance, this is Tucker Carlson, absolutely nailing today's zeitgeist.

Classic Tucker.

(25 minutes)

Like /Dislike this video here.

2024-02-08

Tucker Carlson is perhaps the biggest name in town right now. Over the years he has made himself a household name simply by being authentic, staying true to his good sense, and "telling it like it is".

So Fox fired him.

Now he has dared to travel across the world into the lion's den itself to interview possibly the most important man on Earth right now - in the teeth of official opprobrium from all the vested interests of the West (especially those with Zionist connections - or am I just paranoid?).

I don't expect this interview to be revealing any great new unsuspected truth (of course I could be wrong) but it would be the first by a prominent (and importantly: trusted) western journalist who has enough reach to sway western public opinion.

And there have been enough snippets somehow leaked in advance to whet our appetite and big up our interest 😎. Yes, this is going to be important, and it has seemingly been

2024-02-07

The much-trailed Tucker Carlson interview with Vladimir Putin has proved to be a little elusive. Some channels claim to publish a transcript - or a part transcript, but the real thing doesn't yet seem to be available.

Tucker says he will publish on TuckerCarlson.com and on X (formerly Twitter).

Meanwhile, here is the official low-down on this interview from Tucker himself (aided by Redacted)!

(14 minutes) 

Like / Dislike this video here.

2024-02-03

Our newspapers and media stations don't report on what they don't see as relevant, but German politics, like seemingly all nations' politics these days, is apparently controlled by the WEF-UN "partnership". It is very similar to British politics, in as much as the political classes are all parroting the Climate Change propaganda as though they unquestioningly believe it. Diversity is good, except for diversity of opinion, and especially diversity of politics.

It's a religion, or perhaps more accurately the biggest cult we have ever encountered, whereby the cult leaders brainwash everybody to believe (and obey) their leadership unquestioningly, and heretics (those who do ask awkward questions) are not tolerated. They have the cheek to call this new form of politics "democracy". "Autocracy" might be closer to the truth.

Germany is the stand-out example of a leadership that brooks no opposition and ...

2024-02-02

Some things take an exorbitantly long time to get resolved.

Take the case (currently in the news) of the Post Office managers who were pursued through the courts for imaginary losses that never existed, but were reported as deficient by the new Post Office computer system - and the courts agreed that the computer was infallible and therefore they were guilty. As an IT systems engineer of many years standing, I cannot conceive of how any competent (and honest) IT professional could possibly stand up in court and swear that his system was infallible. It also beggars belief that it could have got to court if either P.O. management or their accountants had been both competent and honest. 

Yet somehow it did. So who was professionally deficient and how? In the way of matters governmental, we will probably never find out, and that too should no longer be tolerated.

"It seemingly did not occur to anyone to ask why over 750 managers with hitherto unblemished

2024-01-30

If anyone doubts that the USA government is pulling out all the stops for the displaced of Lahaina, this report should clarify the matter.

Nick Sotor reports from Maui for Redacted:

(12 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2024-01-26

There are so many issues to dissent about these days that it's ridiculous to expect that every dissenting voice is going to agree on all of them.

So to those conspiracy theorists out there who call out other dissenters because they disagree on a specific issue (however important that issue), I suggest that we all bring a level of truth (and awakening) to the specific audience that is most attuned to our own viewpoints, and the audience which is not prepared to listen to our dissent to their particular belief will be catered for by others.

The enemy of progress is indeed the quest for perfection (especially our own idea of perfection!).

So I'm happy to tip the nod to Lawrence Fox for this video, even if we may not agree on all the issues that face us. We do agree on probably the majority, and the rest will come in God's good time as everybody

2024-01-26

Early in 2020, according to Professor Mark Woodhouse in his  evidence to the Covid Inquiry, the BBC (no less) was reporting "misinformation". Yet it went uncorrected "throughout 2020" which surely makes it "disinformation" (as in "d" for "deliberate")?

But his declared suspicions about the real reason for this failure to report this pretty important truth  to the public - that the risk of "dying from Covid" was vastly greater to the aged than to the young - had to do merely with justifying lockdown in the public mind.

This clearly marks him out as merely an amateur conspiracy theorist. A true conspiracy theorist would have recognised that if the actual impact of Covid was minimal for most of the population, then not only would lockdown never have been tolerated, nor would there have been any chance of jabbing the entire population with an untried and largely untested experimental gene therapy described as a "vaccine" in order

2024-01-23

A very unexpected speech at last week's WEF in Davos, a speech that took on all their false doctrines head on.

It takes a while to get going, but it is certainly a massive (and welcome) break from their tradition.

"... in power not to guide sheep, but to awaken lions"

What could be further from their intention?

(Brought to us by yet another YouTuber of whom we have likely never previously heard, who nevertheless sets the scene pretty well)

(12 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2024-01-21

You can see why the authorities might get fed up with all the conspiracy theorists putting out mis/dis/mal-information. After all, it feeds dissatisfaction with the mainstream media, maybe also influencing the public to mistrust media output, or even vital government policies.

For example, this sophisticated and apparently well-produced video makes claims that may defy belief about the way that the internet is allegedly influenced by certain governments. Some folk may well be misled by similar content, even equating some of the activity portrayed therein with the supposed activities of 77 Brigade in the UK, without a shred of evidence.

Be aware - not all videos are everything they seem.

(14 minutes)

2024-01-21

"Malinformation" - that which is true but which is used against official globalist policy.

I suggest that this is merely a logical extension of the established concept of "hate speech" - the truth (where it may conflict with the globalists' agendas) may well cause globalists to be offended and therefore it must be criminalised.

Nothing at all to worry about.

Stand & Deliver Episode 77 

2024-01-16

Not all MPs are knee-jerk supporters of this Government Bill.

"A bill to prevent public bodies from implementing their own boycotts against Israeli goods has passed through the Commons, despite opposition from Tory MPs"

That our government is even contemplating such a Bill seems inconceivable.

If they don't want public bodies to take partisan sides in such matters, then that may well be arguable, but a one-sided ban favouring one specific party that may conflict with a local democratic mandate?

(9 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.