2026-10-23

We featured extracts from Dominic's appearance before a Parliamentary Committee earlier.

This is the full appearance.

There is much here with which this site would agree and much with which we would disagree, but like him or loathe him, he's one of the few prepared to speak truth unto power, and with the personal experience to back up his views.

"It can only change if it's obvious that there's a Prime Minister that actually wants it to change and is going to force change through the system..."

Maybe this is all of a piece with Rupert Lowe's rise in the public estimation, and for my money he's the only party leader who has unequivocally nailed his colours to the mast on the topic of rooting out the Blob that runs the current (and I quote)

2026-10-22

The hearing is over. 

No defendants attended in person.

The post-trial Press Conference is reported below.

The court will rule between 9th December and the end of February.

(*LIVE*)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2026-10-22

Today's civil case proceedings brought by Dutch claimants for vaccine damage are in Dutch, but English translation and this video are courtesy of Lady Xylie of Interest of Justice, by permission of the Court.

(5 hrs 5 mins) (All day hearing)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2026-10-21

"Baroness Hallet found care homes 'received insufficient protection at the time they most needed it” and the virus then “spread like wildfire' "

"In April 2020, the high number of deaths of people in care homes brought into sharp focus the devastating impact of the COVID-19 pandemic... " -Quite so.

Of course this is put down to - in effect - incompetence. Nobody realised the risks of a pandemic to the "vulnerable elderly' in care homes! 

The Daily Sceptic reports.

What do we pay these "experts" for? Why were the results of all the previously existing pandemic preparedness planning exercises thrown out of the window and ignored? 

Why should anybody take pandemic advice

2026-10-18

Regular readers will not need reminding of our view of Covid.

Still, ours isn't the only possible view, even amongst those who discount the "novel virus" idea.

But it is along not dissimilar lines...

2026-10-15

“It’s a grand show reasserting the longstanding UN commitment to a technocratic state buttressed by a surveillance infrastructure... It creates no new legal frameworks or obligations"

"The U.S., along with Argentina and Israel, voted against it. New Zealand and Paraguay abstained"

That's all we need to know really.

The US has done everybody a favour by making it all optional according to the preferences of the member state concerned.

CHD reports.

2026-10-11

Well, if the cap fits...

• Coercion
• Censorship
• Misrepresentation
• Disregard for the law
• Vast profits

(although it has to be said that all this would have been impossible without the willing cooperation of governments)

2026-10-11

It's a proposition with which we may find much to agree.

With individuals, psychopathic tendencies are limited in scope. With governments, such tendencies can be supported by the full range of coercive powers and national resources available. With a global government they would to all intents and purposes be unlimited.

So however likely or unlikely one might think it of a government, one really should consider that if it were so, that would be pretty calamitous, so it would be most unwise to evade the question.

When considering the government of the USA, the danger would be close to unthinkable...

But whilst the Trump Administration is indeed pretty erratic in many ways, does his behaviour amount to psychopathy, and are there other circumstances that may be in play ?

2026-10-10

We are by now familiar with the old colonial practices whereby the wealth of the colony was extracted and shipped home - by any means necessary, including war, slave labour, child labour, bribery and corruption of the ruling elite.

But a case can be made that the UK itself is now being treated as a colony, and this time it's the wealth of the "middle class" population that is subjected to extraction.

Of course it's all about taxation, "our" NHS, inheritance tax (painless, at least for the deceased) and some think by money-laundering through the government to private pockets (of the central bankers?) although minor funds may be diverted to their cronies (fast-track procurement channels anybody?).

So what's new?!

Of course this is simply the latest "conspiracy theory",

2026-10-06

Mark Sexton draws our attention to his correspondence with the Metropolitan Police concerning this crime report, which asserted that crimes were committed under the government's programme of Covid Countermeasures.

The Police handling of this complaint led to the Ethical Approach UK investigation into Operation Talla (see our reporting here.).

Mark Sexton today reviews the exchange between Mark Sexton and Detective Inspector Akshay Chibber in January 2022.

This exchange is analysed here. No reason why "allegations against the Government's Covid
regulations and vaccine programs are not a matter for the Met police to investigate as allegation of a criminal offence" is proffered. Could

2026-10-05

A shell project is a housing without content, an incomplete construction that cannot function of itself without a working interior.

The CDC's V-Safe vaccine safety monitoring project was, according to Brownstone, just that - a project that presented a caring interface to the vaccine-injured that permitted them to report their vaccine experience, but which had no means for analysis of or reaction to those reports. 

React19  was set up to analyse and report on the content of the V-Safe reports which were obtained by the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) by freedom of information request. 

A Federal judge had to order the CDC to release the free-text responses in response to an ICAN lawsuit.

I think one might reasonably ask why the CDC set the

2026-10-03

In the age of pandemics which the WHO assures us is incoming, this question is important but never investigated and reported - well, not by the medical establishment anyway (43 minutes).

2026-10-03

The tort liability case against Gates, Bourla, Rutte, etc resumes at Court in Leeuwarden in the Netherlands on 22 October. All other things being equal...

The Court has expert testimony, and may or may not allow cross-examination of witnesses.

"Co-defendants include Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla, former Dutch Prime Minister and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, the State of the Netherlands and 13 others"

2026-10-03

The tort liability case against Gates, Bourla, Rutte, etc resumes at Court in Leeuwarden in the Netherlands on 22 October. All other things being equal...

The Court has expert testimony, and may or may not allow cross-examination of witnesses.

"Co-defendants include Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla, former Dutch Prime Minister and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, the State of the Netherlands and 13 others"

2026-10-02

17 minutes.

Polly Tommey interviews Helmut Sterz D.V.M. on the "vaccine mafia".

"it's a big system that profits from 'vaccination'"

Childrens Health Defence carries the story.

2026-10-02

One might be forgiven for asking a number of pertinent questions about this civil lawsuit, such as why it's a civil suit and not a criminal prosecution?

Perhaps the clue is in here somewhere:

"Plaintiff brings this action exclusively under the laws of the State of Florida... Plaintiff only brings claims as the head of the Department of Legal Affairs under FDUTPA"

Still, it's a step forward rather than backward, and as the burden of proof is a little lower in a civil court it may have more chance of success?

Step into the quagmire here.

2026-09-26

"No-one is safe until everyone is safe".

Which means?

"No-one is safe".

Because making everyone safe is an impossibility.

But words appeal to different people in different ways. If you have spent your earthly life in IT then you are likely to respond to the logic. In which case you may agree with the above reasoning.

If you have spent your life in a more flexible "feel good" profession such as entertainment, publishing, film-making etc then you may well have a different interpretation, regarding logic as unnecessarily limited in its ability to convey meaning.

Those that prefer to trust "the authorities" (because fundamentally they find the idea that 'authorities may be seriously untrustworthy' is a notion that they don't feel able to cope with) may appreciate the first assertion as "caring" and therefore support it in

2026-09-23

Well known pandemic dissidents are losing patience that the Trump regime will ever do anything to reverse the Covid narrative, expose the mRNA shots for the biological weapons of destruction that  they are, and indeed get on with the Epstein miscreants (starting with all those in public office) and the whole public take down of the deep state.

And that it seems to me is the crux of it - once that threshold is crossed there's no going back, indeed the only sensible option is to press forward at full speed with arrests and all the associated works - it's the argument that cannot be lost and further shilly-shallying will not cut it.

So getting public opinion onside before taking that step looks like an essential prerequisite.

And perhaps the public's reaction to this move by the Covid dissenters will be enough to persuade the authorities that the time has come?

We know what to do -

2026-09-20

Another day, another court case.

A court case that maybe should not have been brought if the Pentagon wanted to keep the illega nature of their Covid injection mandates looking... well, if not exactly ethical, at least maybe not actually illegal.

"informed consent was impossible for 402,000 service members"

Interest of Justice reports.

2026-09-20

Interest of Justice reminds us of the Allison Inquiry in Canada, the not-a-government inquiry into the effects of the Covid measures taken in Canada.

We reported previously on this, but these testimonies need to be given further prominence. 

In fact it's just the tip of the iceberg.

See the full playlist here.