EU e-Privacy Directive

This website uses cookies to manage authentication, navigation, and other functions. By using our website, you agree that we can place these types of cookies on your device.

You have declined cookies. This decision can be reversed.
  • The Covid Control Ratchet Turns Another Notch?


    Yes, it hasn't escaped my attention that this is the 1st April - but the article in question was written in March!

    Lockdown Sceptics posted a somewhat jaundiced review of where the government is going to take the NHS Test and Trace app, and having read it a few times I find myself torn between thinking that they have finally lost it and gone full conspiracy theorist, and on the other hand thinking that "our" government really might be controlled by some James Bond villain(s) working from within a secret lair to control the world. The latter notion probably wouldn't need more than a few dupes at the top of the power pyramid to ensure that the wrong direction is taken.

    "... displays your medical records to unwitting restaurant owners, bar staff, and presumably anyone with an authoritarian streak who sees themselves as an agent of our new bio-security state. It is morally and ethically bankrupt, but technically, could it work?"

    That last question is apposite because our governments' (of all hues) track record in setting up workable IT systems is derisory in virtually all respects, but whereas in the past the fall-out from these has been limited mainly to the profligate and appalling waste of taxpayer's money, and failure to deliver its limited objectives, it doesn't take that much imagination to understand that the fall-out

  • Covid-19 Bereaved Families for Justice


    "As families bereaved by Covid-19, we’re campaigning for lessons to be learned as quickly as possible in order to save lives as the virus spikes again around the country "

    "The Government has agreed to order an Inquiry down the line, and that’s the right thing to do. But to get real answers we absolutely need an independent and judge-led Statutory Public Inquiry – where the Government doesn’t get to mark its own homework"

    "Every day the government fails to learn lessons, more families are going through the same loss and trauma"

    "We must hold the government accountable and act to save lives"

    "We have sent a final pre-action letter to the Government informing them that if they don’t take action to initiate a statutory Public Inquiry we will begin legal proceedings to try to secure one"

    This is another campaign to try to use the justice system to persuade the government to set up an urgent and, many would say, much-needed "judge-led" enquiry into the government's handling of the pandemic.

    Already the Simon Dolan case has been refused permission to proceed and the Robin Tilbrook

  • Lockdown - the Never-ending Gift


    Our governments around the world now believe that they can do it.

    Why would they give it up?

    Kit Knightly, writing for Off Gardian, provides a short and succinct summary of what she considers it was all about - and what was that?

    Read the article!


    Even Brexit-Watch (straying uncharacteristically off-topic) puts forward their view of how far this government has strayed from our once-proud tradition of fair-play and honesty:

    "broadcasters continue to say they are still forced to push out one-sided and sensationalised coverage of the pandemic because of Ofcom rules which forbid any reporting that is critical of restrictions"


    Taking up the subject matter in more depth, Daniel Miller,

    PCP Papers Laid Alleging Pandemic Fraud Against Hancock, Whitty, Vallance & Ferguson


    Finally, it's on.

    After months of preparation, the first legal steps toward bringing the alleged  miscreants to trial for their alleged Covid fraud on the British Isles and on the world are moving forward.

    "In addition to the charges of fraud by false representation and non-disclosure, in material breaches of sections 2 and 3 of the Fraud Act 2006, we are informally applying for a declaration, under the inherent powers of the court, which states that autopsies are to be carried out for all alleged COVID deaths, which will be held as evidence in the forthcoming trial, on the ground that we have expert witness testimony of the falsification of death certificates, as per UK Government policy"

    "We are also asking for a moratorium on the UK flu and COVID ‘vaccinations’ programmes to be declared for period of at least 90 days, in order to definitively establish whether it is COVID-19 or ‘vaccines’ that are killing people at a minimum mortality rate of 377 per 100,000 healthy adults, as per the leaked WHO approved ‘vaccine’ safety study which we are adducing into evidence"

    Read all about it!

    For more details,

  • New UK (NI) Covid Advertising Campaign!


    Over the water the UK (Northern Ireland) Stormont government is inviting tenders from advertising agencies:



    See the Tender description here.


    To put this into context, I show below a graph from the Northern Ireland Covid-19 Infection Survey (download):

    Estimated percentage of the population in Northern Ireland testing positive for the coronavirus (COVID-19) on nose and
    throat swabs since 24 September 2020

  • Covid-1984 Case Update - March 2021 - The Bernician


    The Bernician has been working for some time on the legal aspects of the Covid "pandemic", but actual legal action has so far not been forthcoming. Clearly if you want to take such powerful vested interests to court on such serious charges, you had better get your case straight.

    Add to that the understandable reluctance of any court to hear such a case effectively against a current government, which if proven would probably bring that government down.

    So I have no idea how all this will turn out, but I find this attempt to bring this case to court a worthwhile attempt as it will put the courts in the position of having to come clean about how they will handle matters.

    So this is the latest sitrep - worth a hearing (even if only to hear his interesting comments about Boris Johnson):


    Like / Dislike this podcast here.

    Follow the

  • Extreme Sports Good - Extreme Views Bad?


    Covid matters medical are still very much to the fore, what with the AstraZeneca vaccine being paused by countries in the EU despite the established medical regulatory bodies all maintaining that it's "safe" and "effective" (even if there does seem to be continuing doubt about what exactly it is "effective" at achieving).

    We live in a world where cures for such (relatively) mundane problems as asthma, and relatively serious problems such as cancer are still not with us, despite many years of research and many false promises that a cure may be "just around the corner" (only requiring another billion or two in further research to bring it to pass)...  just for it to disappear from the headlines without further trace.

    Meanwhile we have "treatments" for cancer that always seem to have the "side effect" of compromising or even destroying our innate immune system . . .

    How does this make any sense? If I were to fall seriously ill I would not want any treatment that did not bolster my own immune system. My reasoning is simple - if I were in that much trouble already how would it make sense to put myself in the way of yet more trouble?

    Now that is merely my own personal viewpoint, and we are all entitled to our own, but sometimes a time comes when we should seriously consider whether the assumptions which we may have treasured for years might actually be shown up for being no longer well founded, perhaps simply obsoleted by the many changes that

  • WHO: "‘No Documented Death’ Linked to COVID-19 Vaccine" as "Italy Opens Manslaughter Probe as Teacher Dies"


    The Epoch Times reports two stories - one about the WHO claim of "no documented deaths... " and another reporting that a death in Italy is being investigated as possible "manslaughter".

    "France, Sweden, Germany, Spain, and Italy all suspended usage of the [AstraZeneca] vaccine this week, joining dozens of other countries in and outside of Europe"

    As they say in the trade: "Hmmmm...".

    Are we witnessing the concept of "plausible deniability" being pushed to its limits?

  • Are the Covid Variants All They're Cracked Up to Be?


    In recent months we have been treated in the press to a great deal of alarmist speculation about the many variants that have supposedly been tearing through our ranks with possibly (but nobody seems quite sure) disastrous effects just around the corner. We have had the Kent variant, the Brazilian, and others which unaccountably but no doubt momentarily slip my mind, and now an even more dreadful Breton variant which (gasp!) is reputed to even evade the PCR test (no, me neither).

    So it is with some relief that I read an article by Michael Yeadon and Marc Girardot which explores the mutability transmissibility and likely severity of these variants. They describe it very calmly within the perspective of the defence in depth which is a primary facet of our immune systems, and very reassuring (in my view) it turns out to be.

    "To date, no robust scientific evidence proves that any of the variants identified are more transmissible or deadly than the original"

    "Many seem to have benefited from a form of immunity even though they had never met the actual virus, nor been vaccinated"

    "Some are advocating the vaccination of people who have recovered from COVID-19... we see absolutely no scientific nor medical justification for such a procedure"


  • Gov.uk - Covid Status Certification Review - Call for Evidence


    I make no comment on this review - I include it here as a public service for those who may be minded to respond.

  • Doctors, Scientists Write Urgent Open Letter Warning About COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Concerns


    We have consistently tried to publish concerns about the manner in which the Covid "pandemic" has been handled by both our government and others, but this letter to the European Medicines Agency demands answers to the pertinent questions (to which I suspect there will be no adequate answers).

    This is a letter to which anybody thinking of taking one of these vaccines should pay attention.

    The specific queries are couched in the appropriate scientific language, but the thrust of the questions is very plain - has there been  adequate safety testing to cover these dangers, and was the pandemic emergency over before "emergency" authorisation was given?

    The implications of inadequate answers are serious indeed - gross negligence at the best, criminal fraud at worst.

    Read the letter on-line, or download from here.

    I believe that sooner or later, there will be some very awkward court cases.

  • All You Need to Know About Covid Jabs?


    This is one of the most level-headed and easily understood descriptions of the major vaccines (Pfizer, Moderna, Johnson and Johnson), together with a Q&A session which tells us a great deal about what is going on, all in less than half an hour!

    Highly recommended:

  • "Urgent Open Letter to the WHO and All Stakeholders Involved . . .@


    Well, inevitably this is yet another Covid article, but it does break some startling new ground.

    Geert Vanden Bossche PhD DVM, vaccine specialist of "world renown", "expert in vaccine R&D and early vaccine development", throws a proverbial grenade at the WHO and "all stakeholders involved":

    "One could only think of very few other strategies to achieve the same level of efficiency in turning a relatively harmless virus into a bioweapon of mass destruction"

    That just about sums it up, and as you can see he is not pulling any punches.

    Here is the article which rehearses his arguments.

    Here is the interview wherein he explains his position (it may take a while to start - Bitchute is worked very heavily these days since everyone set up there from YT):


    Del Bigtree of the Highwire explains his thesis more clearly in this presentation (starting at 32 minutes 15):


  • Covid? or Vitamin D Deficiency? How to Treat? Get the Low Down


    If you feel that the last thing you need is another article about Covid, then who can blame you?

    Nevertheless I feature this video presentation (whilst it escapes the Y T censors) because it's a short simple nuts and bolts explanation of the benefits of vitamin D, also Ivermectin as an early and safe treatment (and not merely for Covid), by a well qualified medical doctor.

    He also has some remarks to make about the drive for vaccination.


    The first 25 minutes only - the second half hour is all about US and Idaho politics . . .


    Like / Dislike this video here.

  • Daily Mail Ratchets up the Covid Fear


    With Covid deaths and cases dropping daily and spring making itself known throughout the realm, it seems that the powers behind the Media are trying to mitigate the risk of us getting uppity and wanting our lives back.

    The Daily Mail duly obliges with a preposterous propaganda piece assuring us that Covid may cause all categories of calamity should we dare to break any rule and catch it by mistake.

    You really couldn't make it up, but they have obviously tried very hard and managed it.

    So what is on this melancholy menu of mischief?

    Is there any part of us that this dreadful disease of dystopia cannot mess with?

    Kidneys, hearing, eyesight, skin, joints, heart (I think they omitted the liver, although I'm sure that "scientists" are working on it), apparently even the brain is not immune from attack . . .    and certainly the DM seems intent on doing its bit to assist on that one.

    Still, the good news is that Brian Blessed seems to be impervious - now that's an example of mental attitude I can certainly recommend.

  • The Corona Investigative Committee Strikes Back!


    Sadly this title doesn't capture the immediacy of a certain Star Wars film title, but it will have to suffice.

    We have reported before on Dr Fuellmich and his campaign to find out the truth behind the pandemic narrative that swept the world in 2020, and his Committee has now published their unambiguous and uncompromising report:

    "The corona crisis must be renamed the “Corona Scandal"

    "... a PCR-test pandemic, not a corona pandemic"

    "Politicians and mainstream media deliberately drove populations to panic"

    "... those responsible for it must be criminally prosecuted and sued for civil damages"

    "I will now explain to you how and where an international network of lawyers will argue this biggest tort case ever, the corona fraud scandal, which has meanwhile unfolded into probably the greatest crime against humanity ever committed"

    This is a tour de

  • Our Government's Covid Abuse Programme?


    Lockdown Sceptics continue the theme that we are in an abusive relationship with our government. The behaviours exhibited are typically assumed to be relevant in a domestic household situation, often but not always between partners and spouses.

    We have explored this notion before, but it is good to remind ourselves occasionally of what is very evidently still going on.

    As "case" numbers fall through the floor and hospital admissions begin to dry up, how much longer will this go on? Presumably until the population at large comes to its senses and says enough is enough.

    Texas has just removed all restrictions. South Dakota never imposed any!

    Our government remains immune to all factors which would indicate that it is well past time to follow the science and return to normal. Boris will thaw restrictions on England only glacially, providing ample opportunity for any

  • So What Exactly Is Covid-19?


    Is it a bird? Is it a 'plane? Is it a weird tennis ball with knobs on?

    No it's a virus! Or so we are assured by those who claim to know. Indeed also by those who demand our subservience to their many and ever-changing diktats.

    The same people incidentally that assure us equally firmly that vaccines were the undoubted cause of the health improvements in the general population observed during the 20th century just gone. Since this is the overwhelming consensus of all the official health bodies world-wide, we are to believe them, and yet . . .  science does not normally advance through consensus (ask Albert Einstein).

    In fact, consensus can be thought to be a block to scientific advance. Because so many of those who need to be convinced of a different and better understanding have made significant personal investments in that consensus, they are understandably reluctant to challenge it. Bearing in mind the many $billions (more probably $trillions or even $gadzillions) already invested in viruses and vaccines by the pharmaceutical industry, unpicking this particular consensus is going to be problematic.

    This puts the free-thinking free citizen in a bind - how to take on the massed ranks of consensual certainty?

    Well, the first point is that consensus only "advances" the status quo. To advance science we need to think outside the box of consensus, formulate the alternate hypotheses, and rigorously test

  • Escape from C***d Castle?


    I'm becoming ever more reluctant to post on the Covid topic since there is little new to say; however, this article in the Mail Online in response to Johnson's "road map" is topical pertinent and (mostly) well-founded. In the end though the only thing you really need to know is this quote:

    "The more SAGE gets wrong, the more Mr Johnson clings to its view of the pandemic"

    The author however continues the dishonourable MSM tradition of assuming that only a vaccine can provide any immunity - in point of fact the disease has been with us for so long now that herd immunity may be the decisive factor - indeed the rapidly evaporating case numbers could be evidence for this, although predictably enough nobody seems to want to mention this possibility.

    Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.

  • Dr. Montagnier Shines a Light on COVID-19 and The Future of Medicine


    The medico-political Covid situation is confusing on multiple levels which will clearly not be resolved any time soon, but just when you thought that there can't possibly be any more new hypotheses to discuss, along comes Matt Ehret with another.

    It is widely accepted that electromagnetic radiation can be damaging to our health. X-rays, gamma rays, nuclear radiation, ultra-violet sunshine are all acknowledged to be damaging, whilst sunlight (excluding damaging UV) is known to be beneficial both physically (allowing the body to generate vitamin D) and mentally (cheering us all up :) .

    Infra-red can be damaging if it causes us to heat up too much.

    All other radiation is thought to be harmless . . .   except where it isn't, such a microwave radiation which causes us to heat up and is used for that purpose in microwave ovens (and for communications purposes in WiFi at low levels thought to be safe by regulators but disputed by campaigners).

    There is controversy about the wave frequencies used for telecommunications and mobile phones - at low levels most (but not all) people seem to tolerate these, but there is concern that some 5G bands may not be benign, concern not exactly assuaged by regulatory authorities that resolutely cling to the now outdated idea that only frequencies that cause heating can be dangerous.

    So is the idea that our biological cells might be using electromagnetic wave-forms as part of