2023-06-11
It is now well past abundantly clear that our government is uninterested in our health, but very interested in making as much money for its cronies as may be possible by a pretence of interest.
Whilst deaths from heart failure surge ever higher, nobody seems to want to take any notice - a bit like nobody wants to take any notice of Andrew Bridgen MP when he speaks of the aftermath of the jabs on many. The jabs are the sacred juice that can do no harm, despite everybody knowing that "adverse events" are an acknowledged and indeed inevitable feature of their operation.
A severe case of Logic Dysphoria?
Do we have a cure for that?
Now it is true that our government has set up an enquiry to "learn the lessons" from the "pandemic", but meanwhile it also seems on course to nod thorough the WHO's plans to subjugate us all to compulsory WHO control in the event that they should take it into their heads to declare the next pandemic - an expectation that they themselves have pronounced in the past, despite the notable lack of pandemics between the 1918 flu pandemic right up until the Covid pandemic.
The same WHO that as far as I know and unlike our own government has not set up any enquiry to determine what went right and what went wrong in its response to the Covid pandemic, and to learn the appropriate lessons. Evidently they too have a sever case of Holy Pharma Infallibility (and I doubt we have a cure for that either).
So why are we to expect more pandemics any time soon, and why should we give more powers to the organisation that hasn't bothered to review its own performance - surely this has nothing to do with the huge amounts of government cash that can be reliably expected (on past form) to flow to big pharma and their associated philanthropists that currently rank as the WHO's biggest funders?
If they carry on like this, people may just begin to use that semi-obsolescent organ that resides between their ears and ask some pertinent questions about the performance of (a) governments local national and global and (b) big pharma and allopathic medicine in general. They might even (Shock! Horror!) conclude that we might be (very much!) better off without any of them, and that would obviously be a bit controversial as it would bring about the end of civilisation as we know it.
And who would vote for that?
