2024-06-30
The gene-therapy not-a-vaccines always seemed to me to be contentious, as they seemed designed to ruin us - by turning our own immune systems against us.
So if there is a protein that out our body should attack, is it really sensible to modify our own cells to produce it?!
If the "gene-therapy" modification that was designed to persuade one's cells to produce that protein lands anywhere in one's body (which it would have to to be effective) then that part of the body will be attacked by the body's own immune system. And if it continues to misbehave (booster jabs anybody?) then the immune system will continue to attack it. So we get a smorgasbord of "side-effects", many of which will cause death, that are inevitable and designed-in.
So it's no surprise that there are many and copious "side-effects" listed for the gene-therapy not-a-vaccines, and that the numbers of excess-deaths from all causes are rising, seemingly inexorably, following the 2021 global injection campaigns.
And frankly, the precise protein is irrelevant - any foreign protein will do the job!
Sasha Latypova takes it to the next level - the debunking of the notion that here is any magical off-switch that can be injected to undo the undoable.
That is not to say that everyone who took a shot will die (outside the parameter that nothing is certain except death and taxes!). It is quite feasible that if the number of cells that accepted the gene therapy is sufficiently small or widely dispersed, then the immune system can deal with them all before a catastrophic collapse in some vital organ occurs, and obviously your general state of health will either support or hinder this process.
Oh, and yes, we contributed to our own demise by unquestioningly accepting a long-recognised fallacy that should have been inculcated into every one of us at school, yet somehow inexplicably seems to have been overlooked by our education systems ...
(85 minutes)
Like / Dislike this video here.
