2025-11-08

Those of us who have been around for years will understand and relate to this more than those who have joined our planet more recently, but we can certainly all learn from it.

Native cultures include our own European cultures - they are still in many ways cohesive, for all the attempts, successful or otherwise, that have tended to whittle away at that cohesion in favour of replacing our reliance on our human community with reliance on the inhuman State.

Yet in chronological sequence, as natives of the seats of the colonizing powers of old (yet still undead) we looked on as native cultures elsewhere were given the treatment, we, thinking ourselves somehow immune, were saved til last to undergo the final treatment that would bring about their global control grid with everybody inside it.

Was the State always inhuman? Yes it was, in so far as except within the ruler's personal court, it always runs on a rule book (or these days infinitely many rule books)

2025-10-30

The technocracy of tomorrow is incoming today, and the lightning speed of technological development isn't short of the BIG BUCKS that will speed it on its way.

So what do we have in store for us if we inadvertently allow Big Tech to pierce a crack in our armour? They have already shown us that they won't hesitate to claim our acquiescence even if they didn't bother to do the "informing" part of "informed consent".

And they don't show any sign of changing their ways, even as they show every sign of changing our's.

Once we let them into our minds to "enhance our thinking" through "the power of AI" (or they do it anyway without openly saying so), then it's open season to do as they please with us; our consent to their dystopia will be automatically theirs through the wonders of technology.

If the AI doesn't approve of us thinking "no", it will simply "enhance our thinking" so that we think "yes!". Job

2025-10-12

Martin updates us on the sorry story (The Trial from Appleby Horse Fair) that exposes the charades that our "system of justice" deploys to bamboozle and exhaust us into compliance with its illegal and unlawful demands.

Illegal because they do not reference real Courts as laid down by law (even where such real Courts may exist!) and unlawful because they are essentially fraudulent, and fraud vitiates everything.

This is his public record of these unfathomable framings, and how the system seeks at every turn to to evade its responsibilities and prevent a challenge from being heard in a real court. Perhaps they really do have something to hide?

Martin 's Public Record.

2025-10-09

Martin Geddes once more, this time trying to give us insight into the primary question of our time:

"What the Hell is going on?"

Making sense of the news (from wherever we may glean it) has never been more tricky - and certainly many believe that we can no longer (if ever we could) rely on the august probity of the BBC to interpret the news for us.

Take for example the Charlie Kirk phenomenon. That really does look like the proverbial rabbit-hole where it seems impossible to sort the truth from the multiple apparent misdirections.

So perhaps we need an investigatory framework within which to marshal the facts, the assertions, and indeed the improbable but not definitively excluded possibilities.

"You won’t need a PhD to join: reference frameworks and

2025-10-09

"Abuse" can occur at many levels right through from the Global to the personal (OK, the pedantic may want to replace "global" by "galactic" or some such, but you get the point).

"The Matrix" is a systematic abuse of the population at large through widespread application of  deceit, fear, and misdirection, through media either unwitting, careless, or complicit.

Within this system we inevitably end up in one of a number of different role types (perhaps several types over different times and circumstances) which Martin Geddes has identified with a little help from AI.

It's useful to understand what is going on here, as it may help us to recognise what is going on in our own circumstances. Although I don't suppose that the list is exhaustive, it's a start.

"The purpose is not to assign blame, but to give you

2025-10-03

When we have checked out the world's religions and remained unconvinced, when we have tried every political party but failed to find any that we could trust, when we have reviewed all our personal acquaintances and decided that none will offer us what we want, and when the supply of gurus in our location falls similarly short...

Perhaps, just perhaps, we have been looking in the wrong place all along?

But where else is there left to look?

(26 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.
See more by

2025-09-28

The recent State Visit by il Presidento Trumpo to King Charles at Windsor is a bit of a puzzle.

What, if anything of significance, was achieved? 

Will Trump get a new golf course to add to his collection? Or was it all about AI data centres and the necessary power stations to drive them right over Ed Milliband's dreams of eliminating the gas of life, all to service the Global Digital Id project?

Or was it all Spectacle and Theatre designed to keep the public distracted whilst other matters are played out behind closed doors?

And where does the impending closure of US federal government at the end of September when the spending taps get turned off (they never have yet!) leave this "special relationship" - will they be forced once again to accept loans from the City of London to keep USA Inc afloat?

Advance the Agentic State!

2025-09-15

Nigel Farage is "preparing for power" (where have we heard that before?!).

And he has a man to lead that process - Danny Kruger, newly joined from the failing Conservative and Unionist Party.

The video featured today covers this announcement. It was an interesting announcement, although it did little more than set out a few ambiguous hints and tips that may or may not produce fruit in due course.

We on this site don't do party politics, but this is an appropriate occasion for us to draw out a few pertinent points of relevance to the UK political scene.

(70 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video

2025-09-14

Martin Geddes has been exploring a few of these tunnels for some time. No doubt there are more to be explored in due course, if not under due process...

Still, his prior explorations enable him to recognise the tell-tale evasions that seem to be required to enable them all. So if one can be collapsed, so can they all.

"Running the whole file through AI has only confirmed what was already clear: the state is not administering justice, it is engaged in systematic racketeering and financial harvesting of travellers"

"This is not just predatory taxation or 'bad government.' It is flat-out treason: bypassing the constitution of the land, enabling fraud under colour of law, and laundering theft through sham tribunals"

"Compared to the ordinary mob, this racket is worse — because it cloaks itself in legitimacy and systematically denies remedy"

Is Epstein More than a mere Agent of the Mossad Control System?

2025-08-14

Yes, more from Martin Geddes, who (rightly) suspects that we could all do with a (relatively) simple primer to help us navigate our "mismanaged" justice system.

"I’ve boiled that work down into a shorter, reusable list for anyone else facing the same fraud and injustice"

Good luck!

2025-08-11

A glimpse of the future, or a load of... ?

Dick Allgire spills the beans on the predicted monetary future.

But bear in mind that predictions are inherently tricky, especially about the future...

(67 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2025-08-11

"The age of title, costume, and jurisdictional deceit is over. Now begins the age of clean signal"

We are defined by what we do, not by what we hope for.

"The final lie is that we are powerless until the regime admits defeat. But the truth is — we are already free"

Martin Geddes draws the necessary conclusions.

2025-08-11

The erratic behaviour of certain world leaders gives rise to a number of possibilities...

1. They are beholden to a number of skilful advisors, whose policies they profess depending on who last had their ear
2. They are played by a number of clones / substitute actors who are beholden to different controllers through blackmail and/or bribery
3. They are robotic AI simulationsserving various AI master programs that are in constant IT conflict to achieve and maintain control of the mouthpiece

There may be other possibilities, but these three suffice to demonstrate the point.

Outlandish you say?

But nothing is off the table. Except perhaps peace in our  time. Or actual prosecutions of the guilty

2025-08-08

Is the world about to be overruled by AI?

Should we be worried?

Will we all go the way of the WEF's Yuval Noah Harari and become hacked to the point that we function as nodes on the huminternet, mindlessly obeying Grand Central AI's instructions?

Or is AI something to be stamped out as inimical to our future as Free Spirits?

Our chances of uninventing AI are looking vanishingly smaller by the hour, so maybe we need to find a third way (just not the Blairite "third way" - that didn't work either).

So where to look? As ever, I suggest in what some may consider the most unlikely place, but a place nonetheless which time and again seems to come up trumps - a financial newsletter.

Time to revisit Investor's Daily. This is not to push any

2025-07-28

AI is coming now well-established, if not yet totally ubiquitous. Give it another week or two.

We have people who have bested it in argument! So is it perfect?

In a world in which it is increasingly difficult to differentiate between truth and falsehood, AI is dependent upon its training materials, so maybe it's inevitable that it will make mistakes depending upon the content of such training materials.

Yet if a mark of perfection is an ability to recognise and correct its mistakes, then it's getting there.

But if it takes a human to prompt it so to do, then perhaps it's a mistake to assume that we hominids aren't needed any more?

Investor's Daily has a slightly different (well OK - exactly opposite) but none the less interesting take on the situation (this is not financial advice):

...

2025-07-26

"Carlisle Absurdity" rules...

... but only if you play along with the hoax.

Martin Geddes doesn't accept the hoax, but moves his case against the non-court system of pseudo-justice forward by that time-honoured method of giving it a label.

Now we can all talk about the "Carlisle Absurdity", and know exactly what it means.

Why should the devil have all the best labels?

Read the history here.

2025-07-24

"What happens when the justice system abandons its foundational attachment to law?"

I hope that Martin Geddes has a good answer.

AI can do wonders for his case, and few there can be who would both recognise the significance and possess the skills and tenacity to see it through.

He deserves our fulsome support.

2025-07-21

Suddenly, Berlin now boasts the fully fledged(?) Global GovernmentTechnological Centre, which will presumably in due course (or earlier?) take over from the failed democracies of the world to manage the global populations through (you guessed it) the marvels of modern AI. What could possibly go wrong?

Could it be worse than what we currently have?

Could it be better?

Has it been tested? (Maybe it has, in that paragon of democracy, the Ukraine?! But maybe also in Berlin, where it no doubt coped splendidly with the sort of issues that arise all too often in Germany).

Is there any proper democratic alternative (perhaps run by humans?) that might be