Legal

2026-02-18

Childrens' Health Defense has filed a RICO lawsuit alleging racketeering against the American Academy of Pediatrics.

In other words, they are setting out in Court to prove that the vaccine industry is all about profit for Big Pharma and its associates rather than childrens' health.

This site wishes them Godspeed.

2026-02-15

Chinese New Year is upon us, and it begins with a bit of word-play at President Xi's expense.

The demand is for "Habeas Corpus" - where is General Zhang Youxia, and who holds him?

(60 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2026-02-13

Fall in with the wrong crowd, fall in with the wrong peer pressure.

It's pretty much that simple.

So it is with drugs. Go to the NHS, get drugs.

Better still, fall in with the wrong group, get cannabis and/or other "recreational" drugs. Get schizophrenia (or other descriptive "diagnosis"), go to the NHS and get more drugs to offset the effects of your recreational usage. 

Yet we did not fall ill for want of a pharmaceutical product. 

You can see where this is going. It's so easy to follow the herd and get inappropriate intervention upon inappropriate intervention, and it doesn't end well.

Except for Big Pharma of course, who continue to get high prices for stuff that may not work and we pay through the nose in taxes for "free at the point of use".... it's a business model to die for, but it's not Big Pharma that does

2026-02-11

It must be every spokesperson's fear, that the statements they make in contentious but complex high profile cases may come back to haunt them.

"... a monumental shift that disproves the Trump administration’s narrative that the action it has been taken on the Epstein Files has been made with the aim of providing full transparency"

So did Kash Patel lay himself open to humiliation by an incorrect answer to a question in Congress?

ZeroHedge reports on a day of unredacted viewing.

2026-02-11

Martin Geddes, fresh from his delta-sigma analysis, now turns his thoughts to the function that "attribution" plays in a Court of Law.

Or should play, but apparently doesn't always?

"The degradation itself is the game being played"

"... when you strip these failures down to their atomic elements, they repeatedly reduce to misattribution... "

"... In each case the object is not treated as a hypothesis to be proven, but as a premise to be relied upon..."

Now listen up, this is serious.

2026-02-11

If we care about the way that Justice (in its widest sense) is administered in this country, and maybe if we have an academic approach to such matters, then I guess we should.

If our academic abilities are dodgy but out approach logical, then we probably should.

If our logic is all over the place and we still have implicit faith in our authorities, then I would steer well clear.

That said, Martin Geddes has come up with an analytical approach (the "Delta-Sigma framework") to assess legalistic encounters with our authorities, that clarifies how our approach may be usefully constructed to illuminate the responses provided by authorities to our legitimate queries.

The previously unachievable (due to the huge investment of time and research required) being now achievable by anybody with a practical working knowledge of AI and the tenacity and logical mind necessary to work through the

2026-02-07

One may argue about how "democracy" died, but assuredly the Epstein revelations will be one of the many stilletos found between the ribs.

Purists will rightly retort "define 'democracy'!", but I use the term to refer to the western "democratic" tradition exemplified by our own "mother of parliaments" in Westminster. The USA has its own bicameral legislature within a federation of states, which to our eyes is equally (if perhaps rather more obviously) corrupted.

Just as a fish is said to rot from the head, so a "democracy" rots from its pinnacle of centralised power, the government. Humanity is an imperfect creation, the government is (supposedly) human, therefore the government is corruptible, and subject to the iron law of computing and life itself - "if it can happen, it will".

It did, and it just got found out for all to see.

Illegal Manipulation? or Normal Financial Engineering?

2026-02-03

Is the UK now a lawless State?

If so, when did it become a lawless State?

And what do we do about it?

Depending on your answer to the above first question, questions 2 and 3 now need some urgent attention.

It became clear to me when the State proposed to inflict a novel "warp speed" (and therefore with untested safety record) vaccine for a "novel" pandemic that had no statistically significant effect on the "excess deaths from all causes" statistic officially published, that something didn't add up. Such a course would be in direct contravention of the Nuremberg Codes if only on the grounds that there was no attempt to ensure that everyone who was "offered" the medication had been able to provide informed consent - on the grounds that they had not been informed. 

Indeed various levels of coercion were attempted in the UK with varying degrees of success. The

2026-01-30

We have been covering the unfolding silence from the authorities on Operation Talla.

Martin Geddes has documented the silence and apparent evasion of the responsible authorities in his quest to establish the legality of the "court" that fined him under the SJP (Single Justice Procedure) for an alleged motoring offence.

It is clear from the investigations undertaken by Ian Clayton of Ethical Approach UK that the authorities relevant to Operation Talla also have nothing relevant to say in response to his direct enquiries.

To remind our readers, Operation Talla was used by the Police forces across the land to refuse to accept reports from the public alleging instances of harm from the acceptance of the Covid vaccines, despite the Metropolitan Police Service initially issuing a crime number (6029679/21) for investigation.

According to law, if a crime report has been made then it must be investigated, which the

free2026-01-25

The UN has abolished itself? A bold claim that requires a bold critical thinker to make it.

Step forward Yanis Varoufakis, scourge of the EU at the time of the "Greek bail-out" (of the EU banks!) , economist, author, and supporter of "the left" (ie: his Left which would actually support the interests of the populace).

"... the United Nations annulled itself when it approved of that resolution...  "

(40 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video

2026-01-24

Ethical Approach UK has published more documents relevant to Operation Talla.

It's clear that there are constitutional implications that may need to be addressed, but which may perhaps be difficult in current circumstances as set up by officialdom.

"What emerges is not a single policy, but a system - one inwhich speech, regulation and policing converge in ways thatweaken the rule of law and suppress lawful and very often,
necessary dissent, in the public interest"  
policing_hurty_words.pdf

"... while a serious criminal complaint remained unresolved and subject to disputed handling by the Metropolitan Police, the SRA engaged in contemporaneous communications with a third-party media organisation..."

2026-01-21

An interesting report from Dr Rachel Nicoll in the Daily Sceptic today.

Not because it breaks new scientific knowledge but because of what it reveals about our "authorities".

Dr Myhill made the "mistake" of advocating well-established remedies for respiratory complaints for Covid patients, and in consequence was hauled before the GMC, evidently not to explain herself, but to be silenced by being struck off.

But the GMC continued, taking her to court.

Where she was exonerated. Reportedly for the 43rd time. 

"No longer can doctors act in the best interests of their patient with proper informed consent"

"... the GMC is the oldest regulatory body in the world. If it

2026-01-20

Interest of Justice are marking the countdown to the US leaving the globalist governance caravan.

And instigating appropriate lawsuits.

"Nobody voted on it. No legislature ratified it. The UN General Assembly didn’t debate it. It was signed by two men — Guterres and Schwab — and announced in a press release."

And pointing out that under the UN-WEF "partnership" agreement, the unaccountable UN became the political arm of the unaccountable WEF.

2026-01-18

Elon Musk. Who else?

A lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft that makes the Trump lawsuit against the BBC look trivial.

"In Musk’s telling, OpenAI used the nonprofit identity to get off the ground, then pivoted toward for-profit structures and a deep partnership with Microsoft that fundamentally changed who the company served"

Is the ownership of another AI product really that important? If it was launched by public funding of a proposed "non-profit" project, then how come it's now a commercial product? Does that not amount to fraud?

I suppose it may depend upon how we define the term "non-profit"... 

And we could be about to find out.

2026-01-18

Schwab gone, Trump in, record attendance of the Great and the (not so) Good!

What could possibly go wrong?

2026-01-17

This is a wide-ranging discussion that covers a lot of ground.

As a quick hour that looks at the western world's predilection with increased government control and financial developments that all seem to be designed to control and take advantage of the general population...

What's the common denominator?

The expansion of Corporate Control over everything, especially over their regulators and lawmakers.

"... If we are going to have a digital prison we would prefer to have Silicon Valley rather than China..."

Fairly typical of the way in which the real argument is shifted from 'do we want a digital prison?' to "wouldn't we prefer our own home-grown prison?'.

You are sure to make new observations about how our increasingly automated and controlling world is

2026-01-17

Well, some of us are undoubtedly ahead on this topic, but the majority are probably not.

After all, the Law of the land is a complex topic, made ever more complex every passing year to the point where the legal beagles can run rings around the common person simply by obfuscation, delay, and weaponising of administration to the point where one lifetime is not enough to read up on everything that we would need to know to win a case in court (AI to the rescue?).

The same applies to most MPs, who have to cope with the additional demands from their political party in order to (a) be selected as a candidate and (b) keep the party whip. And maybe also illegal demands to keep them subservient to secret agendas from unelected international bodies or even criminal syndicates.

Ok, most people probably don't accept the latter, but it doesn't matter - Parliament is at best a closed shop that places

2026-01-12

Maybe "When it's an mRNA 'vaccine'"? Or perhaps when the FDA doesn't know how to apply its own definition to obtain the only permitted answer?

Not "Newspeak", Good Lord no!

"Screwspeak" perhaps - or maybe "ScrewYouSpeak" - we can never have enough new words to describe the devious subterfuges that officialdom adopts to try to wriggle out of stating the absurdly obvious can we?

At this point the man or woman on the Clapham Omnibus will simply observe that the Emperor is linguistically naked.

Or maybe this is simply "soft disclosure"...