2024-05-15
Martin Geddes has been contemplating the incoming Greater Reset.
Well, it is abundantly clear that somebody needs to, and would we trust the current incumbents at Westminster anywhere near the fabled levers of power ever again? It's a reasonable expectation that many of the extant people posing as authorities will be removed as being part of the problem, so cannot preside over the solution.
My first comment is that since the US military seems to have us all under (so far undeclared) martial law, the initial take-down of the criminal elements of the establishment must be conducted by the military themselves in accordance with the military laws in effect.
Why are we in the UK talking about the US military?
Because this revolution is not local to the UK, it is global against the global mafia, and the US military is taking the lead because ... well it's a long story. Where have you been these past years?
Martial law will rightly or wrongly but necessarily preclude any argument over niceties. It will be what it will be, and subsequent argument and heart-searching will be fruitless and largely preempted.
Will the French reintroduce Madame Guillotine, and the British the Halifax Gibbet, or even King Henry's axe?
Probably the Laws of War Manual doesn't leave such latitude as to the form of dispatch, and just as well. Whilst executions must be witnessed ("justice must be seen to be done") they should never be public entertainment.
That said, the inescapable consequences of decades of treason and manipulation will take time to unwind. There are rafts of issues arising around which many will have divergent opinions, high among them being non-native additions to our population. The UK has a reasonable track record of success in assimilating immigrants over the centuries, but that ability has been ever more stretched by a highly suspect mismatch between declared immigration policy and actual immigration action (especially since "Brexit") and by no means only in the UK.
It's of no use to blame the immigrants (unless they actually conspired with a UK authority for an illegal purpose), but mass deportation seems like a draconian "solution", in the round likely to do as much harm as good. We probably don't even know who or where they are!
Following the shock of the new, the military will need to hand power back to a civilian administration - but since it was the old authorities that got us into this mess, we will have to invent new authorities public services, responsive primarily to the people and Constitution, before that can happen. The old discredited and corrupt model of Monarch-Parliament-Civil-Service-Statute-Book-Judiciary-Oligarchy cannot be left untouched, but must be simplified and made directly both accountable and responsive. This will be very unfamiliar territory for most.
For it to happen, "We the People" will need to step up to defend our interests. After many years of leaving these in the hands of the ruling political classes, that will involve a very steep learning curve, and I predict an extended period of military rule incoming.
All that said, back to Martin Geddes, who offers both a ramble through the consequences of the revolution:
The calculus of consequences
and a review of how we got here and how the revolution may unfold - this isn't all his own work, but is based on a piece from "X":
"I wish to highlight one account on X that is making very bold assertions — PeckerwQQd — and summarise what is being said"
Keep smiling: the end of corruption in Britain
Quite so. I note Martin's reservations!
I would guess that there will be as many views on this as there are people in the UK, and some of it does seem impracticably draconian to me, but as a starting position that gets the discussion going it's probably both necessary and adequate.
"It's your view that counts"!
