Conspiracy Corner

2024-02-17

There's so much in this interview that we are all sure to learn something new, to learn more about the historical events that brought us to where we find ourselves today, and how (but not why) we seem determined to keep digging despite the size of the hole that we are already in. The "why" is a seriously large omission that lies at the heart of current events and future direction.

A tour de force.

(42 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2024-02-17

One of the enduring mysteries of our time is the mystery of Tartaria.

We know that it existed, and appeared on many old maps.

We know that is was huge (at least in geographical area).

And not much else...

And yet, much remains around the world that might (or might not) be associated with it. Now I'm neither historian nor geographer, but I do find it quite extraordinary how little we seem to know about Tartaria - we know far more about the ancient cultures around the Mediterranean, supposedly two thousand years ago, than about the largest country (possibly excepting China) that existed up to only 200 years ago.

So has something been hidden from us? Is history as we know it bunk? Or what?

In the absence of real information, conspiracy theories will flourish simply because man is an inquisitive being, and will try to

2024-02-17

This is not party-political (in the sense of one political party competing against another).

It is party-political in the sense that the concept of "the political party" has been and is still weaponised against the demos in order to invert the official relationship - so that the people become the servants of the government rather than vice versa.

It is the case that most recent Acts of Parliament already give ministers the power to vary or remove existing clauses and insert new clauses without necessarily having to submit their suggestions for debate in Parliament. It is sufficient to publish the proposals to MPs, who need to demand a debate within a short time frame in order to get one. Since MPs are busy people who don't necessarily want to "rock the boat", these changes may well be allowed through without debate.

Technically therefore such Acts of Parliament may be very significantly updated, without effective scrutiny, since ministers may make use of

2024-02-17

Dr Angus Dalgleish explains for the Daily Sceptic quite a lot about virology that I might take the time to quibble with.

He also reviews the WHO's obsession with disease X, noting the emergence of very disturbing stories that some conspiracy theorists may regard as fear-mongering designed to drive a popular demand for the safety supposedly derived from control of the global medical response by the same WHO that made such an excellent job of defending us against the Covid menace. 

So is this yet more propaganda to push us into the arms of those who would rule the world, or does he have a good point to make?

Sadly I'm not going to spoil the ending - you'll just have to read it for yourself!

2024-02-16

A very hard-hitting, hard to watch report from UK Column covering chapter and verse of the Covid "pandemic" vaccines trials, and subsequent approvals under Emergency Use Authorisation by the MHRA.

"The FoIA request was eventually granted by court order through the PHMPT's attorney, Aaron Siri. The judge in the matter required the FDA to release all 451,000 pages of information over eight months, despite the FDA planning to retain the data for 75 years"

Yes, there's a lot of detail here but in summary form (phew!), all based on documented results from many thousands of volunteers for the original Pfizer and Moderna vaccine trials.

It's a long presentation at a little over one hour, but keep going because the final summary of how the "outbreak" went all the way from "we've got a

2024-02-15

Many may doubt any linkage between the science of psychology and the mysteries of astrology, although it's also fair to say that some have unkind views about both disciplines.

Richard Vobes plunges heedless into the quagmire, interviewing a psychological astrologist who makes a surprisingly perceptive case for the relevance of her discipline to current times.

This is well outside my own life experience, but certainly qualifies as something that makes you go "Hmmmm".

So if you are feeling open-minded (and I can think of worse ways to spend my time!)... plunge in.

(62 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video

2024-02-14

It is a basic tenet of our legal system that justice must not only be done, but must also be seen to be done.

This "being seen to be done" cannot merely be interpreted as "being seen by the legal profession to be done" since the whole point of the principle is that the public should not lose confidence in the independence of the judiciary.

Whose responsibility is it to ensure that justice is seen to be done, and what safeguards are in place to ensure that when it isn't, something appropriate is done about it?

I am no lawyer, so will not comment on the correct legal interpretation of the case in question, but to my untutored mind it does appear that in this case, justice might not have been seen to be done. The very fact that a noted independent journalist thinks so is to my mind prima facie evidence for this.

2024-02-13

With the European (plus British and Irish) farmers on the march against government overreach, now is perhaps a good time to review the kind of steps that can be taken legally to discourage heavy-handed government measures based upon pretexts that may not actually stand up to scrutiny in depth.

For example, take Bovine Tuberculosis, the cause of which is/was said to be the "reservoir" of the disease in wild badgers, which prompted the extensive culling of badgers in recent years. 

Being not a farmer myself, I haven't heard of any particular widespread situation related to Bovine TB, and as far as I know the WEF has not yet mandated the destruction of our cattle for any reason other than excessive flatulence.

But in case I am behind the curve here, I draw attention to the Bernician's

2024-02-12

"There can be no doubt now that regime change is happening in the Western world"

The pace of change is increasing and keeping tabs on everything is correspondingly difficult.

The farmers revolts are spreading, with even the English emulating their Gallic friends across the channel (although I have yet to see reports of English town halls being treated to a brisk hosing down with legendary farming materials - maybe they still have some tips to learn from the Yetties). 

And of course "that interview" unaccountably seems to be causing ructions amongst certain groups, even if Mr Putin was very circumspect in his history lesson. It doesn't seem to have done his popularity any harm.

2024-02-11

To some extent we have covered this before...

... but it's always good to see others putting out the same message.

Pascal Najadi joins the AJ Roberts Show to explain the truth that nobody will believe - that WW3 has been waged for some years and is (hopefully, allegedly) now coming to a close in 2024.

That's not to say that it's over, or that there won't be a great deal of sweeping up to do in 2024/5 and onward, but maybe the active stage is over (or will be closed shortly) (whatever that may mean). 

"The Law of War Manual of the United States Military is in force"

"If you don't now read what we disclose then you will have a hard time to get to grips with what is soon coming to surface... "

A Battle Won, the War Continues

2024-02-11

"We follow Government policy"

Dr John Campbell interviews John O'Looney, funeral director. 

It seems that the only difference between this and "disease X" is the preparedness of officialdom to talk about it.

Nothing new here, except the latest information on official exchanges. A reminder, if any were needed, of the dedication of our governing authorities to our welfare and safety.

(32 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2024-02-10

Whilst we are on the mundane topic of traffic tribunals...

... we rise up to take a birds-eye view of the likely course of future city interventions, courtesy of Laura Dodsworth.

It's not a vista conducive to wanting to move into the great metropolis of tomorrow in the same way that people moved into the metropolis of my youth - attracted by the bright lights, good times, funky clothing (yes, I did have a pair of flared trousers... though never drainpipes), and the sense of "happening". It was mostly myth of course and it didn't take me long to move away, housing becoming insanely expensive and traffic ridiculous. 

Although that last bit is still true today, the dull compliance with all things rules-and-regulations that is required these days probably doesn't compete with the "happenings" of yesteryear. It is all going in the wrong direction, from bottom-up freedom to top-down one-size-fits-all coercion. Don't enter the hatched area, drive the right

2024-02-09

The much anticipated interview is here.

President Putin delivers a two hour interchange with Tucker, which includes a potted history lesson of the last centuries, plus the more recent history which has brought us to where we are today.

(2 hrs 7 mins)

And...

strictly for conspiracy theorists only...

Jean Claude (from Beyond Mystic) discusses the interview with Janine - whether or not we believe in tarot cards, this does raise some hugely important points which if

2024-02-08

Martin Geddes is nothing if not persistent - but persistence is a virtue.

The panoply of legalese that is ranged against us is nothing if not seemingly impenetrable, and we don't in general have the time or the inclination to sort our way through the entanglements in order to establish the path back to honesty and integrity, so it falls to a few stalwarts who do muster the time and inclination, and are gracious to publish their results for our benefit.

They deserve our support.

Of course that doesn't absolve us of our responsibility to take on the challenges ourselves - in actuality it does the reverse - but it does give us a relatively clear road-map to guide us in so doing.

This is his latest update on his legal tussle with the Traffic Penalty Tribunal, where he is

2024-02-08

Care pathways have become a bit of a euphemism these days for disposal of those elderly for whom the State has no further use, and who are unable to stand up for themselves. It may be controversial but there is a groundswell of opinion that doesn't disbelieve that this took place during the Covid years. 

But does it continue today?

Jacqui Devoy reviews the state of play with Brian Gerrish (audio only).

"This is what's happening, they all close ranks - the police, the NHS, the Coroners, the Courts, the pathologists... once one gets uncovered they all get uncovered"

"... if you're 80 or above... you automatically score 5...  It's very easy to put someone on... one of these... death pathways... " 

"... Matt Hancock ignored all that and implemented NG163 anyway... NG163 is identical to the Liverpool Care Pathway...

2024-02-06

Martin Geddes continues his siege of Durham County Council, bringing up the legal Trebuchet to fling his Estoppel Notice to the miscreants cowering in their Council Offices.

Which elicited a response that was essentially as expected.

Which in turn enabled him to deliver what he believes should be the coup de grâce.

This would mean an end to any further court actions, so it may be some time before we hear any further news on this front, since it will probably

2024-02-06

... or is this merely another absurd conspiracy theory from Ridiculous Richard with no basis whatsoever in fact?

(7 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2024-02-06

Once upon a time (and not so long ago) judges in Britain declared that freedom of speech without the freedom to offend was not worth having.

But under what circumstances does one man's "hate speech" override another's "freedom of speech"? It's a question that our parents/grandparents would not have understood, but with which we today must grapple.

Back in the day, Britain's judiciary used to take a robust view on people who decided to be offended by mere words. Provided that there was no incitement to commit a crime, Joe/Jemima Citizen was invited to take the rough with the smooth and grow a thick skin. It's a clear and unambiguous approach that used to put everyone on an equal footing in law, and facilitated full and frank discussion around many topics that some believe have become treacherous legal minefields

2024-02-06

Yes, today our cup runneth over, with Natalie from Redacted interviewing the ever-reliable Ivor Cummins about the state of farming in the Irish Republic, as well as in the UK. What a pleasure to hear two sane and competent people speaking of the unspeakable in a sane and competent, even rather light-hearted, manner.

Of course, the farmers of the EU also get a mention... as do all the usual suspects...

"... The only thing that can push back against that now is ... "

(18 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.