2023-05-04

The inimitable Richard Vobes asks a theatrical but pertinent question.

Just how much if anything should we be required to take on trust?

(13 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2023-05-04

An interesting conversation.

"You wanna see a cemetery for birds? Just walk under a windmill"

(30 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2023-05-04

Coronations are rare events of singular importance in legal religious traditional and indeed even revolutionary terms. 

But simple it isn't - every one of us may have a view, sincerely held, based upon different aspects of the historical viewpoint, that essentially may range from "history is  bunk" to "history is the final arbiter". But - whose version of history is to be believed?!

So by way of illustration (and it should be noted, a measure of light entertainment), we investigate the rather limiting viewpoint that a successful coronation MUST be based upon the use of a "genuine" biblical relic that, given the passage of time and the consequent opportunity for corruption of both the message and the relic itself (not to mention the acknowledged inclination of humanity toward both mischief and error), a sane person might reasonably conclude that the genuineness of both the message and the relic cannot be established beyond reasonable doubt.

That being the

2023-05-03

A startling article from Technocracy News and Trends, obviously prompted by the up-coming coronation, features King Charles of the WEF.

"King Charles ... outlines the “10 actions we must take to drive the green recovery.” These 10 actions ... would allow for basically no freedom in a top-down dictatorship that decides for us how all resources are to be allocated and used"

"... in order to allow ... assessments of sustainability compliance ... It is time now to move towards unified metrics and global standards, to encourage accelerated progress... "

And there will be a meeting in September to discuss how to get their stalled project back on track.

2023-05-03

A presentation of the Covid history presented by those MEPs who were alert, conscientious, and not afraid to speak their minds, and by a number of subject matter experts in their field. We have featured many of these already elsewhere but here they are all together.

Prepare for an extraordinary education.

(8 hrs 39 mins)

Watch on CHD TV.

If you need a deep dive on the Covid shenanagins, then this is it!

2023-05-03

"In the days leading up to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's approval of Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine, U.S. and U.K. health officials entered into a 'mutual confidentiality agreement' to keep vaccine adverse events under wraps"

"It would be very helpful if our Office of Vaccines could receive additional details [redacted] from MHRA [UK Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency] under the terms of our mutual confidentiality agreement."

So on the face of it, our MHRA was colluding with US FDA (Food and Drugs Administration) to hide adverse reactions to the jabs.

That's just the tip of the iceberg.

No doubt more evidence will come to light in due course.

2023-05-02

The fog of war continues.

Russian targeting update.

I would expect both sides to be pushing the disinformation, but the colonel's track record doesn't seem too bad, even if, despite winter, we are still waiting for the ground to firm up before either side can mount an effective attack.

Meanwhile the destruction continues.

(30 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2023-05-01

An informative report today, even if you don't have a subscription (although subscription is recommended - you don't want to miss the end-game!).

Benjamin has more connections than most, but be aware that the various secret services will tell him what they want him to report...   truth can never be assumed, particularly when the stakes are so high.

Events are unfolding fast now.

2023-05-01

It is well known by now that the major news media companies are not interested in reporting the news, only in making it up to suit their corporate (secret service?) masters.

The events of recent years have brought this sorry state of affairs to the fore, and a new raft of independent media companies have launched to enable the population themselves (those that wish it) to create their own media. But all this takes money and resources, and the funding is ultimately controlled by the same bankers corporates and oligarchs who fund the existing media, now in decline.

So who is actually manoeuvring to profit from and control the new, brash, up-and-coming media? And where are they likely to take it? Will we ever have a truly free and impartial media dedicated to truth? Is such a thing even possible?

Whilst we don't know the answers to all of these questions just now, the indefatigable Amazing Polly has at least begun to prise the lid off this can of worms

2023-05-01

Sparked by the state of the world in general and the latest conflagration in Sudan, Neil delivers a comprehensive summary of where we are, how we got here, and what to do (although he might be giving them a couple of centuries benefit of the doubt?).

Right on target nevertheless.

(12 minutes)

2023-04-30

"Precision Breeding" wasn't a term that sprang readily to mind last year. The uninformed may find themselves struggling slightly to disinter the proper meaning, which is probably why the term was chosen, in place of "GM but not really GM" or some other such verbiage.

Yes, what it seems to amount to is GM with a new label. Actually, GM without any label so as not to cause unnecessary alarm to the shopper. Because it's not supposed to be as bad as GM, it's not supposed to need any special consumer labelling. We don't need to worry our poor little heads about it.

Of course it's not the same as GM, otherwise it would need labelling, it's just GM that could have been (but wasn't) produced by selective breeding, using natural techniques such as cross-breeding and selection that have been practised for years. So that's all right then?

Well, maybe, maybe not. As so often it comes down to

(a) The characteristics

2023-04-30

We know that the cost of Covid measures (value for money or not) has been sky high.

We know that the damage to the economy, to schooling, to the elderly was enormous.

But for a global assessment, we are indebted to UK Column for pulling together as complete a picture as I have yet seen.

"Since Covid–19 was recognized in Western countries in early 2020, expenditures on public health in many of them have more than doubled, imposing over $500 billion in monthly costs on the global economy"

" Food and non-alcoholic beverage prices rose by 14.6% in the 12 months to September 2022"

"in February 2020, there were already 4.43 million people on a

2023-04-30

Tines change, and the mood of the nation presumably may change with them, so it's a question worth asking - what will the national mood be next Saturday 6th May?

It's not as though King Charles is uncontroversial - on the one hand he has championed organic horticulture and farming practices for many years, but on the other hand he is front and centre on Climate Change and apparently fully on board with that foreign multinational body the WEF, so his loyalties do appear questionable.

So without wishing to take sides on this argument, there are questions to be asked, and who better for the job than Richard Vobes?

(16 minutes)

...

2023-04-30

(17 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2023-04-29

These two videos ambushed me this morning.

On the face of it neither of them grabbed my attention, but I wasn't feeling my best (late night last night) so it was convenient to indulge YouTube with some leisurely viewing, apropos of nothing in particular.

Serendipity - the art of encountering fortuitous happenings!

These are long videos, and in a (rather extended) weak moment I watched them both to the end. They are not related except in as much as they deal with a broad sweep of history, but the presentation and subject matter is complementary.

The first is an interview of talking heads, and is probably the easier to follow, whilst the second is in lecture format (albeit quite informal) but it does have an annoying habit of showing the lecturer rather than the slides he is talking about.

And ignore the intro, it's nothing to do

2023-04-28

The good folks at LarouchePAC are undoubtedly good folks but unhappily somewhat low-key, even on occasion stultifyingly boring - there, forgive me, but I said it.

That's not however to say that they are wrong, inconsequential, or can be safely ignored.

If Trump has an Agenda 47 then I'm pretty sure we should be taking a vigorous interest.

So what is this Agenda 47? 

If "the Donald" will forgive me, I summarise briefly below:

• A new generation of 10 new "Freedom Cities" (to be commissioned after a design competition)
• VTOL vehicles as the next generation of personal transport
• Air mobility revolution to transform commerce
• Dramatic lowering of cost of living
• Baby

2023-04-28

An unlikely headline you may think, but Scott Ritter explains it in a few seconds flat.

And I would say that he's on the button.

Question is, will they go to war with Ukraine / NATO, or will Ukraine respond to China's offer to intermediate some negotiations before it gets totally out of hand?

" ... on April 1st, Ukraine was supposed to sit down in Istanbul and sign a peace treaty with Russia - but NATO intervened...  "  (I suspect that was April 2022)

"... I say this as an American who doesn't want to die... "

"... ultimately, that's his only viable option... "

(32 minutes)