2026-01-17
Well, some of us are undoubtedly ahead on this topic, but the majority are probably not.
After all, the Law of the land is a complex topic, made ever more complex every passing year to the point where the legal beagles can run rings around the common person simply by obfuscation, delay, and weaponising of administration to the point where one lifetime is not enough to read up on everything that we would need to know to win a case in court (AI to the rescue?).
The same applies to most MPs, who have to cope with the additional demands from their political party in order to (a) be selected as a candidate and (b) keep the party whip. And maybe also illegal demands to keep them subservient to secret agendas from unelected international bodies or even criminal syndicates.
Ok, most people probably don't accept the latter, but it doesn't matter - Parliament is at best a closed shop that places the demands of the union (AKA political party) above their promise to represent their constituency. The question then becomes: "Who controls the political parties?"
And are MPs really there only to take the blame for the failings of their perpetual "civil servants"?
Question: how many civil servants does it take to run rings around a cabinet minister? How many civil servants populate the Cabinet Office?
Which part of the law of the land don't we understand?
(25 minutes)
Like / Dislike this video here.
