2025-01-28

Have you ever wondered (as I have) why archaeologists seem to be obsessed by the idea that ancient sites were used for the purpose of child sacrifice?

There are I suppose two possible explanations for this -

1: these sites really were used for this purpose and the activity must have been quite ubiquitous over different places and ages

2: modern-day archaeologists have an inexplicable but unfounded obsession with the idea that simply won't go away

Now what's past is past and what's done is done, but what if this problem remains endemic in our time also? 

There are concerning indications that this may be the case, and

2025-01-27

"Each covid vaccine that is approved has been through rigorous clinical trials and safety checks".

Well, such was the wording received from my MP when I suggested some years ago that the MHRA might not be sufficiently diligent in the matter of ensuring vaccine safety. It hasn't aged well has it?

The truth is leaking out, even if only anecdotally.

But with MPs in thrall to the MHRA's alleged dedication to public safety, who is to provide a properly researched and audited authoritative opinion?

Welcome to the present - it isn't what we thought it was, and nor are our "independent" regulatory agencies.

2025-01-27

For good or ill, change is sorely needed.

But what kind of change?

Well, there would seem to be only one candidate, a former scourge of the EU Commission, in the frame - Nigel Farage.

A consummate politician who (a bit like Trump) appeals to the man in the street rather than to the political hacks and media pundits.

So can "the Nigel" do for British politics what "the Donald" just did for the mighty United States?

Importantly, can he manage as well as politic? Can he mould public opinion as well as reflect it?

Can he outmanoeuvre the Sir Humphreys of this world and set Parliament back on track as the true representatives of their constituents who really do determine policy?

One thing is for sure - if the Civil Service under his premiership retains its "untouchable" status,

2025-01-27

Clif High lays out his personal view of how the power to control the planet may evolve over the coming year(s).

If we think that the old World Order is somehow going to continue, then we may need to reconsider.

This isn't to suggest that his apocalyptic vision is necessarily incoming either very soon or at all, but it does represent another part of the spectrum of possibilities that we may need to contend with. I judge Clif to be a very experienced guy who has knowledge and abilities well beyond the common man (although he doesn't kindly take prisoners!) so his views are likely worth noting, even if we consider both them and his style of presentation to be politically incorrect.

2025-01-27

Given that much of what appears in the press can no longer be taken at face value, and every politician worthy of note (or not) seems to be working to a concealed agenda (or not), it's become more or less impossible to come to conclusions about what any one of them may be up to, let alone forecast how the whole may resolve to bring us our future.

Especially given the breakneck speed at which the new Trump administration is breaking ground and breaking politicians such as presidents and prime ministers alike. It was hard enough to keep up before 20th January. 

Let's just say that this is a time when we all need a certain amount of faith that the Universe has our best interests at heart.

"Trust and verify" as used to be the motto of UN disarmament inspectors...

This for what it may be worth is Ben's viewpoint that he feels able to release in public this week. Whether we agree with everything is up to us... 

2025-01-27

Legal processes are infamous for lack of rapidity, and it's clear that time is required to make proper investigations and ensure that the arguments are properly presented and logically resolved. When the outcome will affect people's lives, that much can be agreed upon and should be uncontroversial.

It's a great shame therefore that the same thoroughness of approach was evidently not considered applicable to the Covid "pandemic" situation, when the WHO and all national authorities down to your local authority fell over themselves to introduce novel pandemic countermeasures not based on any previously accepted pandemic policies, and then to rush novel technology "vaccines" into the arms of everybody worldwide who could be persuaded or cajoled into accepting them.

That those whose traditional function was to "speak truth unto power" and to "hold authorities to account" should have inverted those functions to uncritically support the authorities "come what may" was indeed a surprise, a surprise that

2025-01-27

A everybody no doubt realises, Baroness Hallett's "Covid Inquiry Module 4" hearings grind on, succumbing to handy confusions over terminology which would be unacceptable in a school debating society.

Are the differences between Process 1 and Process 2 the same as the differences between Processes A and B?

I suppose it depends on how closely and confidently you were able to attend and decipher the long and rambling question.

"The inquiry has thus enabled a situation where the primary failing of the MHRA has apparently been denied. The truth can now be dismissed as yet another ‘conspiracy theory’ "

Happily for us mere mortals, the Perseus Group (who they?) has form in questioning the response of the UK medical regulators to the Covid alleged pandemic, and

2025-01-27

No, apparently his case has not fallen by the wayside, it is progressing on the basis of factual discovery.

Of course that means a delay whilst the necessary facts are discovered, and brought before the Court, but hey, that can't be too difficult for our safety-conscious no-stones-unturned medical-pharmaceutical-political complex can it? 

They have been given 3 days (until tomorrow 28th January).

Place your bets now...

2025-01-27

Martin Geddes provokes our little grey cells once more.

His journey from matters material/commercial through matters legal and on to matters spiritual has been a fascinating tale, and has exposed how he considers that the matters legal may conflict with both the spiritual and the inappropriate implementation of the legal.

Javier Milei encapsulated the folly of trying to legislate for every possibility when he noted "the infinite expansion of the aberrant state" in his recent address to Davos 2025, although he probably had more in mind than just rules and regulations (the State being very prone these days to extend its reach into control of matters parental and much else besides).

Jesus himself set the scene where the Bible records

2025-01-24

Javier Milei addresses Davos, 2025 style.

And as if that wasn't enough, a free extra bonus appearance by the new Boss, Donald J. Trump at 27 minutes.

(70 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2025-01-23

Has Trump overreached himself?

Does picking a fight with President Putin bring peace in the Ukraine any closer?

Does imposing tariffs on the BRICS solve the problem of the weakening US dollar?

Set against Trump's history of coming back from the brink, these moves look odd. Nevertheless, he isn't negotiating with the opposition here, he is more likely setting the mood music for the guidance of US opinion.

"Everything that Trump's doing is just completely contradictory"

So, perhaps he is just making a lot of noise that the BRICS know amounts to very little... but maybe elements within the US do not.

Or perhaps his primary target is China, whose current exports to the US are probably too large for them to lose on day one to tariffs, so they may need to reduce their prices temporarily whilst they seek alternative

2025-01-23

"Chris Whitty... told the Covid Inquiry this week that the decision to mandate Covid jabs was “100 per cent a political one” and he was "sceptical" of it"

"Has the public health establishment at least learned something from the last few years?"

If nothing else, these last few years have permitted the "public health establishment" in all its varied forms to demonstrate that they are totally immune to all criticism, whether justified or not. Immune even to the Nuremberg Codes that declared unequivocally that anybody to be subjected to a medical experiment must be (a) fully informed of the risks (b) free to decline to take part. They were coerced at every turn into taking an experimental intervention described as a "vaccine" which was in fact a largely untested gene therapy that turned out to confer no stoppage of onward transmission and negligible effective

2025-01-22

From the name itself, one might think of UFOs / UAPs, or some science-fiction portal concept. The truth seems to be more prosaic, but just as topical and probably just as much misunderstood:

AI

But not just any AI...

Conspiracy Sarah asks the relevant question - what could (possibly) go wrong?

Does Trump believe this stuff?

Or is he indulging his favoured tactic of putting likely miscreants squarely into the limelight for investigation by the public? And if he isn't, it's a good bet that there will be no shortage of public volunteers who will oblige anyway, given the current reputation of the mRNA shots

2025-01-22

Scott Ritter reviews the state of play in the Middle East for the Schiller Institute.

It's complicated, but the current situation, whilst not solving the immediate problem, may open additional options...

(11 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2025-01-22

Tomorrow is the second reading that the Green Blob hopes will send the Climate and Nature Bill speeding its way toward the Statute Book.

So what will it mean for the legendary man on the Clapham Omnibus?

"... Parliament is due to vote on a Private Member’s Bill that could lead to mass starvation, widespread disease and fatalities and the almost certain collapse of civil liberties and society within a few years"

Is that all? And here I was thinking that it might be serious.

"The bill is a thinly-disguised attempt using meaningless climate and nature crisis verbosity to ration and control almost everything that citizens consume"

Well, my parents had to cope with rationing and much else in WW2 (and beyond), and we survived that

2025-01-22

A timely reminder that Davos is still a thing, although whether "of beauty and a joy for ever" may be debatable. 

What tedious extrusions of verbiage must we decode this year? Sadly the event may have been overshadowed by that other show unfolding over in Washington-no-longer-DC (?) that seems to be attracting much global media coverage. Whether the attracted levels of interest are due to the contrasting styles of the chief protagonists, or to the likely success of their respective endeavours, is a question that may be pondered. Time will tell.

See the full timetable here, courtesy of Interest of Justice.

Be sure to mark your calendar to make sure you don't miss your favourite items!

2025-01-22

The continuing UK Covid Inquiry has been, some believe, just a gargantuan whitewash exercise in favour of the team that brought us the Covid "pandemic".

The US too has had its own version of the Covid Inquiry, so how does it fare by comparison? And does anybody care? Should anybody care?

In my view, yes we should, because right or wrong, it betrays much about current thinking and therefore likely future "pandemic" planning. Will such be based upon firmer ground than last time?

We on this site have made our views clear, that the whole operation was a simple scam based upon blatant manipulation of the statistics on a global scale, a manipulation designed to divert attribution of the normal seasonal winter deaths away from the normal flu-like and towards the SARS-Cov-2 Covid label; yet even so a scam so tricky that perhaps it threatened to expose another vastly greater scam, that in turn threatened the reputation and future of almost the entire

2025-01-21

"Wipe your brain of everything you thought you knew about American geopolitics"

(126 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2025-01-21

GBNews - "renowned historian Victor Davis Hanson shares his insights on Donald Trump's inauguration and the transformative vision he brings to the presidency"

(70 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2025-01-21

Are you a living breathing human being, with family, friends, acquaintances, aspirations, skills, qualifications, life history, health issues, and opinions that have all been hard-come-by?

Or are you a 64-bit sequence of ones and zeroes on a computer database somewhere "in the cloud"?

Would you prefer to deal with another flesh and blood human being, capable of recognising you for what you are, and your circumstances for what they are, or should you just quote your id number to an AI system that has somebody else's values and objectives (not necessarily known to you) built into its code?

"The Open Society, the Gates Foundation, the Bilderberg Group, the Council on Foreign Relations, they are in direct control of the UK"

The problems with government are actually many, but the primary problem is that they want to govern.

...