Tip - If you are using a phone, set the "Desktop Site" option in your browser   

Featured

World Health Stands at the Crossroads

Details
Category: Health
Hits: 109

2025-12-18

Many of us now realise that Big Corporate of all kinds pharmaceutical agricultural petrochemical etc interests work via their "non-profits" and "charitable foundations" to advance the cause of their respective industries, often in collaboration with government "regulators" and "think tanks" and any other interested "independent" NGOs including the United Nations and its diaspora of largely unaccountable "doers of good" like the WEF.

The question that Interest of Justice is now asking is the pertinent one:-

Can this false cornucopia of self-serving corporate-governmental (BTW: is that not the original definition of fascism according to Benito Mussolini?) bodies ever be made to work for the interests of the people, and if so, how?

To make things more complicated, the above unaccountable plethora of those who would rule the world of organised health is in effect split in two - one arm under the UN and all its works, and the other under RFK Jr and his MAHA project, which is struggling to overcome the regulatory inertia so beloved of vested corporate interests in America and elsewhere. 

This is a mammoth problem, and the answer to making this particular mammoth extinct is not going to be simple - even to define it is a considerable exercise that I of J should be commended for nailing so precisely.

"The reality is that neither option exists. What’s emerging is a multi-polar competition over who controls global health policy—and every player is compromised"

"The BRICS+ alternative ... could provide middle-income nations alternatives to WHO or U.S. frameworks ... but democratic accountability isn’t the priority"

Quite so. 

There is much about "sovereignty" here, but little about the sovereignty of the individual person which is still protected by law almost everywhere. Nobody is entitled to force a medical intervention on anybody else without their informed consent (and certainly no experimental intervention) whilst the Nuremberg Codes hold.

So until this mess gets sorted out, we need to get ourselves informed as best we can, and be prepared to say "no", gently but very firmly.

Maybe we should just remember: "We are what we eat", and diet was 90% of good health for thousands of years before any of these mostly 20th/21st century supra-personal bodies were invented.

 

The Law to be Applied to the BBC

Details
Category: Free Citizen
Hits: 444

2025-12-17

Did the BBC always suffer from Trump Derangement Syndrome?

Well, it probably does now. The Donald is suing them in Florida for defamation, and potentially for trying to influence the outcome of the 2024 presidential election. For $Billions. Nobody can say how much just yet as it may include punitive damages if sufficient intent is proven. Which doesn't seem unlikely to me.

Of course whatever damages are awarded, getting that much money out of the BBC might be an international issue, and affect whether the BBC can survive in its current format. If uptake of the licence fee is any indication, the Great British Public is already voting by closing their wallets, so finance is likely an issue.

"For perhaps the first time, the BBC will face a legal process in which discovery is compulsory. Panorama producers and editors will have to surrender emails, messages, ... "

Of course, it's open to the UK press and media to not bother to cover the case of the century - after all, who is this jumped-up president who doesn't even seem to be in charge of his own political party half the time?

Still, in this age of too easy / too much communication, I suspect that the details will out ...

 

The Law as Applied in the UK for Operation Talla

Details
Category: Covid
Hits: 156

2025-12-16

Operation Talla as investigated by Ian Clayton (Ethical Approach UK) and reported by Mark Sexton has had the effect of preventing the operation of Justice in the UK, by the expedient of censoring the reporting of certain alleged high crimes and misdemeanours.

This article follows on from our earlier report.

Such action by the police (possibly supported by others) has exposed our executive government as a lawless organisation that has deliberately and almost certainly illegally (I am not a lawyer!) denied justice to the people.

However you look at it, the allegations suppressed were so serious that justice had to be seen to be done. Even by setting up the Covid Enquiry, the government effectively ensured that it was marking its own homework.

Far from Justice being seen to be done by an independent judiciary, Justice has very clearly been seen to have been suppressed.

This is not over until the root cause has been identified and justice has been served.

When the separation of powers is sidelined, impartial justice is abandoned and we are ruled by an unaccountable government.

Ian Clayton (Ethical Approach UK) has drawn up documents that expose the problem, together with proposals to mitigate the problem. Whatever we think of these proposals, they deserve careful study.

Whilst it's not clear that any part of the State will be willing to oblige, it is therefore up to the public, and those genuinely independent bodies that remain.

Documents list:

The Tor Garnett Correspondence
Forensic Analysis of the Tor Garnett Letter
Situational Position NPCC/Operation Talla 10 Dec 2025
R v Dytham 1979 Court of Appeal
What really happened to CRIME NUMBER 6029679/21
Forensic report on undated national communication by ACC Owen Weatherill to Chief Constables & Force Duty Gold Officers under OP TALLA

Blueprint Proposal for PIA and PPS

Zipped archive of all of the above 

See also Dr David Cartland on Substack.

 

The Law of the World - Routinely Broken?

Details
Category: Free Citizen
Hits: 115

2025-12-16

" ... there are four international universal crimes that can be committed ... we brought those into English law and we added the bit about 'aiding and abetting' .... "

Likewise for aiding and abetting 'terrorism'.

So how to enforce the law? Is ignorance of the law a defence in Court if we were never told about that law?

Are we now dug into a hole so deep complex and opaque that it has become impossible - even perhaps for our national leadership - to obey the law?

"Our MPs and Ministers are never told the truth about the international agreements and laws that apply to the waging of war ... "

Or would they just lie about it anyway?

"Not only is tax immoral, it's also unnecessary ... "

Oh I say! Steady on. That's another topic altogether ...

Neil Oliver investigates ...

(47 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

Read up about:

The Recognition of Trusts Act 1987,
The International Criminal Court Act 2000,
The Terrorism Act 2000.

 

Medical Sleight of Logic?

Details
Category: Free Citizen
Hits: 469

2025-12-15

The Brownstone Institute wades in where lesser mortals fear to tread - on the toes of the Pharmaceutical Industry.

We have mentioned before the view that Big Pharma may not always have been scrupulously honest with us.

Now the Brownstone Institute (surely a name that simply exudes probity integrity and moral rectitude?) weighs in with their views on vaccinology, and finds it, well, less than persuasive.

As always, it falls to us to be the judge of such matters.

 

Page 18 of 344