Featured

Tip - If you are using a phone, set the "Desktop Site" option in your browser

Elvis (and Others) Live!

Details: Category: Free Citizen; Published: 23 September 2024; Hits: 749

2024-09-23

Ole "Light on Conspiracies" Dammegard is one of those people who take their time to get into their presentations - it's a trait that causes me hesitation in featuring their work, because I am conscious that my readership doesn't often have the time or inclination to sit through long videos.

Nevertheless having watched this through, my hesitation has evaporated (despite the several "hiccups" in the recording). If you can find the time to view it, I think you will find that he knocks it out of the park.

Of course, by the very nature of his work, we don't readily find material corroboration for his assertions from independent sources, and yes, it's perfectly theoretically possible that he has made the whole thing up, so we must all make up our own minds on that score.

So here is Ole Dammegard bringing Michael Jaco - and the world - up to date on a great deal from HIV to Elvis via Olof Palme and others.

(60 minutes)

Watch the presentation here.

Whilst We Were Sleeping ... WW3 was Requested - and Denied - for Now

Details: Category: Free Citizen; Published: 22 September 2024; Hits: 813

2024-09-22

Scott Ritter brings us up to date.

UK PM Starmer wanted NATO to target Russian targets on Russian Territory.

"Russia will attack the United States"

We were within a whisker of a WW3 nuclear exchange.

According to Scott Ritter.

(37 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

Define "Word Salad"

Details: Category: Free Citizen; Published: 22 September 2024; Hits: 795

2024-09-22

"Word Salad" in general means a collection of imposing-sounding words which communicate no sensible message.

Certainly no precise coherent message.

The art of the word salad has been refined over many years by that putative global fascist dictatorship known as the New World Order.

It's a long and carefully executed attempt to bamboozle the world population into accepting their pronouncements without argument, because ... well, how do you argue with an interminable pile of nonsense?

The people pushing it always have more labyrinths of nonsense to send you around!

The pile simply has to be rejected in toto.

Happily I am spared the need to dive in and demonstrate the meaninglessness of the pile of garbage because the inimitable Ivor Cummins has done the demolition job already.

Enjoy!

(68 minutes - even though he does skip through it apace!)

Like / Dislike this video here.

Are We to be Mugged by a Word Salad?

Details: Category: Free Citizen; Published: 21 September 2024; Hits: 817

2024-09-21

Well, time is fast running out ... before the United Nations agrees its new "Pact For the Future"!

Of course one might argue (many would and do) that the world is in a parlous state exactly because the UN hasn't managed to sufficiently control things in the period leading up to this moment, but don't worry, it's nothing that handing ever more powers to the good folk at the UN wouldn't resolve, as they would then be able to be properly bossy and everyone would have have to tow their line, whereas up until now their powers have been too easy to circumvent.

It's the usual storyline: It's not our leadership that's at fault, it's all because these countries simply won't do as they are told! So "countries" are outdated and must be abolished and we, as the New World Order, must be given plenipotentiary powers ... or something like that.

You can find out (if you have a spare lifetime to investigate, decipher the blurb, and wade through innumerable documents reports and proceedings) but if you have a life to live you probably don't have either the time of the inclination (which is how they get away with it - I'll see you in Dystopia shortly).

James Corbett of the Corbett Report ... um ... reports:

(59 minutes)

Life of Brian Meets Riccardo Bosi

Details: Category: Free Citizen; Published: 19 September 2024; Hits: 769

2024-09-19

Martin Geddes reminds me of Riccardo Bosi's design for his political party AustraliaOne - the first political party whose primary aim is NOT to take power! Sounds like something from Monty Python? Close, very close! But quite wrong.

(3 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

So how does the People's Front of Judea differ from AustraliaOne as specified by Riccardo?

The point being highlighted by Martin Geddes is that the PFJ is absolutely no different in attitude and methodology from the Romans that they oppose.

And do not all our modern day political parties end up putting all their efforts into electoral calculations focused primarily on gaining power? So how do the new parties (of which there are quite a few) differ from the current established parties?

What makes AustraliaOne different from everybody else? I quote Riccardo below:

"Our purpose is to save Australia"

"The logical consequence of that is that people will vote us in"

How? "Purpose, Method, End-state"

"Everything we do must contribute - can't deviate to the least degree - from that purpose"

"Method comes after the analysis is done"

End-state is critical:

"That Australia is a moral, sovereign, self-reliant, Christian Western Constitutional Republic which is economically powerful, militarily intimidating, politically free, culturally vibrant, and socially cohesive"

What is a moral people?

"A moral people agree what is right and wrong, and think speak and act to advance the right and eradicate the wrong"

Here's the toughest way that we can do this ...

"We create a moral political party, that assists every Australian to attain their highest individual potential, so that all can participate in the reformation of Australia"

"Everybody must be lifted. Let's get everybody up so that they can lead themselves"

"... to ensure that as much political power ... is in the hands of the people at the local level ... the power must be at the very grass-roots"

"We don't want candidates responsive to us (the party), we want candidates responsive to the people 24/7, 365 for the duration of their term of office"

Clearly it's not hard for naysayers to ask innumerable questions about all the ways in which this might fail, but what Riccardo seems to be laying out is a process for achieving a "government of the people, by the people, and for the people" that perforce will demand full response and participation from the people if it is ever to come about.

And that is the mountain that will have to be climbed, because we are starting from a position where the people are accustomed to leaving politics to the political classes.

This is the problem that confronts all peoples of all countries around the globe, and it isn't going to happen overnight.

Will it ever catch on?

Are the people truly up for it?

We watch the progress of this experiment with enormous interest.

Page 160 of 312