Tip - If you are using a phone, set the "Desktop Site" option in your browser   

Featured

The Most Valuable Information in the World

Details
Category: Health
Hits: 387

2025-08-30

Mark Attwood interviews Ian Clark - how much do we value our health?

How much does Big Pharma value our health - less than we do, or more? Or perhaps what they really value is our sickness ...? Which option would reward them better?

So whom should we favour with our trust - ourselves, or the medico-politico industry?

And why do we not consider our health until our body smacks us across the face with a serious problem? That happened to me around the turn of the century, and it became clear that if I continued to rely on the NHS for a problem for which they clearly had no answer, then I was just being stupid. So I would have to work something out for myself.

So I did. And it's fair to say that I never looked back. But I was lucky - my problem didn't involve an early death, even given the NHS's ineffectual management. Whilst I was smacked gently, many are not so lucky ...

I learned that health is not about applying different protocols for different symptoms, it's about establishing eating and living habits that support a healthy environment within the body. If we liken the body to a fish-tank, are the fish healthier in clean water or dirty?

It's not a quick fix, it's a journey (where have we heard that before?), and it's the direction of travel that's important. But just changing my diet effected a huge improvement!

And the one critical principle that we should learn first is that the body-tank needs to be slightly alkaline - if it becomes acidic then we're opening the flood-gates to all manner of ill-health. So as a first step, close the flood-gates by eating to support alkalinity!

I'm still learning ...   and I suspect that we should all be still learning.

(65 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

 

Why is Debt Slavery Babylonian?

Details
Category: Conspiracy
Hits: 464

2025-08-29

Maybe because fake money was invented - or more likely first appeared - in ancient Babylon.

There are implications that arise from that statement that I will leave as an exercise for the reader - I can't be expected to spoon-feed every answer!

To be sure many do say that debt-slavery was invented there, but that rather presupposes that Babylonian money existed prior to debt slavery, a proposition that may not be supported by evidence ...

So what is this "debt-slavery" notion? Nothing less than the art of fooling people to repay fake loans with good money, and ultimately take on amounts of fake debt so large that they cannot be repaid, leading to fake bankruptcy under the system. It's fundamentally a deceit (which we have talked about previously), but to recap we need to talk about what is money, and to do that we have to talk about the purpose of markets, and how money enables everyone to come to market to sell their goods and to buy other people's goods in exchange. 

Money is just the tokens people use to represent the goods they have produced, which can then be spent to buy the different goods that they need from others in the market. Tom brings cattle, Eva brings eggs, and Simon cleans windows.

Money eliminates the need for bartering cattle against window-cleaning and eggs!

Because nobody can then spend more value than they have produced, there will always be goods in the market that they can buy with the tokens that they have earned by selling their own production - "as ye sow, so shall ye reap".

Honest bankers provide a service by taking deposits of people's unspent tokens, and lending them out to others to spend, thus keeping the market from seizing up. These tokens are real money which represent real goods/services available in the market. The market remains in equilibrium.

Babylonian bankers upset the natural market equilibrium by creating money out of nothing and lending it out. We now have more money chasing the same goods so prices rise, the loan is ultimately paid back out of money earned by producing, so the banker can now pay for goods which he has not earned! It's a sophisticated fraud on the entire market.

OK, there are plenty more ins and outs to this but you get the basic picture - the banker can raid the market effectively for free because he ends up with real money which does represent real goods available in the market, in exchange for providing fake money which represents no goods available in the market.

Of course, nobody in the market can tell real money from fake except the man who is spending his loan, and it's not in his interests to disclose it even if he realises the implications.

And of course it's worse than that - the Babylonian bankers can create loans for themselves (and their cronies) which they may not bother to repay - in fact, because they produce no useful goods or services, they can't repay them with real money (and repaying fake money with fake money is clearly a null event), so they "write them off" - they might call it "Quantitative Easing" ... but the only effect is to fuel inflation in market prices at a higher speed than previously -  then everybody needs more pay-day loans to cover higher prices and tide them over until next market-day ... hyper-inflation beckons.

But according to Interest of Justice, there's more techniques and more consequences ... and more going on to get the world out of the debt trap.

 

The Inversion of Government

Details
Category: Free Citizen
Hits: 927

2025-08-29

Dominic Cummings.

A name to strike fear into darkness by simply shining the light of his reportage into the deep abyss of inverted government.

That nobody else has dared is extraordinary - there have been memoirs enough published by politicians over the years but nothing on this scale. 

Will he survive, or will he be suicided one day and mysteriously disappear, and his truth with him?

If anything at all is to be salvaged from the existing machinery of government then his writings will form the irreplaceable bedrock of evidence and logic upon which the redesign will eviscerate the long list of everything that is wrong - and more or less everything is indeed wrong.

But there is hope (Farage take note!):

"A PM could reverse this fast. A highly underrated fact about Britain is that, because of our unwritten constitution, a Live Player PM could change things faster and more effectively here than any other western country"

But maybe we may need first to revert to our proper Constitution (ie: at least prior to the Blair destructions), maybe even to repeal the Act of Union which introduced the notion of Great Britain into our lands (under which the State of Israel was founded), and discard the myth that we have no Constitution.

But everything in its due course ...  someone needs to devise a plan.

Read the whole sorry story.

 

Britain On the Brink

Details
Category: Free Citizen
Hits: 1021

2025-08-29

Nick Griffin may not be everybody's cup of tea but he's "been around" for a long time and no doubt learned a fair bit in so being.

Regardless of his history, what he is saying on his new Substack does seem to make a great deal of sense even if not everything will find universal approval - but who does these days?

For all those of us who recognise that the real conflict is a psychological battle involving many factions but ultimately pitting those who want to destroy civilisation against those who want to recover it, his article covers a lot of ground and suggests a lot of good sense.

Whilst some of the factions may seem irreconcilable, we are all humans that want respect for ourselves, our families, and our version of civilisation. The way to obtain this for every faction involved without mutual destruction through civil war, is through mutual respect, a determination to avoid conflict through negotiation, and recognition of those who would pit us against each other as a common enemy.

All factions may face a long road ahead, but we need to plan the route.

 

Education Clearly Qualifies for "Special Needs"

Details
Category: Free Citizen
Hits: 1012

2025-08-29

We don't feature much about the state of schools in our country, because it's a long time since I was at school, and no doubt the changes since then have been enormous.

A few years ago David Adelman asserted that schools today are no place for children - but the catch is that nobody has time for home-schooling these days (even if they knew how to do it) so parents send their kids off to the State's tender care.

We did that ourselves.

There they get the State's one-size-fits-all education by artificial intelligence - in other words, there is a rule for everything and the rules must be followed. Regardless of whether the kid actually needs a bit of TLC or a clip around the ear (only joking!) he/she/it/them/they/<insert your pronoun here> gets what the State in its infinite wisdom eventually prescribes provides ...having discussed the matter in all the appropriate committees with all the appropriate local "services". And if you are lucky, with the parents.

It's a bureaucratic jungle out there!

And though we were somehow spared the worst of the State's education system, we didn't escape our share of the consequences.

And yet - there is one key difference between education and indoctrination - whereas education teaches a child to think for herself/himself, indoctrination teaches a child to learn everything that the experts tell it - and thus NOT to think for itself but to "trust the experts". So we get the absurdities of "Climate Armageddon", pseudo-pandemics such as Covid, pseudo-science such as virology, a galaxy of woke pseudo-genders, many pseudo-cures such as chemo-"therapy" and radio-"therapy" that will likely eventually fail to cure under the watchful care of "our NHS", and (I no longer doubt) a totally false view of world history as well as of science.

Worst of all, we now have a pseudo-government of puppet pseudo-politicians who we must now consider run the world not for us, but for secret services and quite possibly unseen powers that seem to be doing their level best to start WW3.

But I digress. Kids should be learning by doing and should have the opportunity to try as many different ways of doing as possible. Crucially they should gain confidence in themselves and in their own judgement in that process. Yes, there's obviously a place for a classroom but mainly as an adjunct to explain the theory of what is being learned through practice.

That confidence in themselves and in their own judgement is exactly what will give them freedom from the diktats of misguided and/or malignant "experts", and all the other pseudo-people.

It will give them independence.

(58 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

 

Page 156 of 436