Featured

Tip - If you are using a phone, set the "Desktop Site" option in your browser

9/11 Unchained

Details: Category: Free Citizen; Published: 08 September 2024; Hits: 905

2024-09-08

The good folk at Archtects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth held their annual conference yesterday Saturday 7 September, to remember the events of the demolition of the twin towers World Trade Centre + WTC7 on 11th September 2001 (I remember watching the event live at work on a colleague's PC monitor).

As allegedly the false flag event to eclipse all false flags, it served its purpose of preparing public opinion for the announcement of the "war on terror". Well, "the war on humanity" doesn't sound so good does it?

SInce that event, many technically competent architects and engineers have mulled the proposition that a flimsy airplane could slice through the many supporting steel pillars which gave the building its structural integrity, and found it preposterous, along with the idea that mere airplane fuel could burn hot enough to collapse the structure.

And how the heck did the not dissimilarly constructed WTC7 collapse (like the twin towers, neatly into its own footprint) when it wasn't even hit by other than perhaps some flying debris from WTC 1 & 2?

It all looked to these experts far more like controlled demolitions than airplane impact result. Strange how financial transactions immediately prior also reportedly turned out to favour certain powerful interests ...

Readers unfamiliar with the 9/11 "conspiracy theory" may like to review our earlier coverage.

Or if sitting through nearly eight hours of video presentation of yesterday's proceedings floats your boat. here it is!

(7 hrs 43 mins)

Like / Dislike this video here.

Chemtrails - What's Up?

Details: Category: Free Citizen; Published: 06 September 2024; Hits: 921

2024-09-06

The inimitable Clif High (making a welcome return to his video format!) explains his putative understanding of the nature of chemtrails and the purposes that may lie behind them.

In this video he centres in on the aluminium content (although Strontium Barium and even Caesium do feature to a lesser extent).

(One does wonder whether Big Pharma's addiction to the inclusion of Aluminium adjuvants in their infamous jabs for healthy people might serve a similar motivation, but that is just conjecture on my part - the postulated connection with autism should be more than enough to dissuade any parent from jabbing their healthy child)

(51 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

Will Renewables Clean Up?

Details: Category: Green; Published: 06 September 2024; Hits: 762

2024-09-06

Well, some think that the much-hyped "renewables" will never be clean enough - and it's not just the natural environment that will suffer either, but also a problem of potentially "pandemic" proportions ... well, I'll let Nick Hubble explain:

(15 minutes) (this is not financial advice!)

Like / Dislike this video here.

How Fares the Russo-Ukraine War?

Details: Category: Defence; Published: 05 September 2024; Hits: 755

2024-09-05

Scott Ritter and Danny Haiphong bring us up to date.

"The collapse is happening as we speak ... "

(23 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

This discourse is all about the possibility of nuclear war - if peace cannot be found.

(33 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

What Is AI?

Details: Category: AI; Published: 04 September 2024; Hits: 3204

2024-09-04

AI is a marvellous tool with many uses, but especially perhaps at this time for the high-level scammers in our world - how so?

Almost nobody (yet) understands how it works!

So we are all fodder for the scam-artists who want us to believe that AI will "rule the world", "take over all our jobs", "always win on the battlefield" (except maybe against another AI!), be all-knowing, etc etc.

So "is AI really omnipotent and can it replace human beings" is a potentially existential question for us.

That AI has its uses is incontrovertible - that it could completely replicate the functionality of a human being is unproven as yet. Some think it might - but as an IT professional of long standing I remain in the unconvinced camp.

Why?

Because traditional digital computers are designed and built by humans and operate entirely as designed by us. If we can't even repair ourselves when we fall sick, how will a computer designed by us ever achieve such a feat?

Do we even know how the human body works? We have been looking for a "cure for cancer" all my lifetime and seem no nearer to that goal today than when I was born - some think we have moved further away, with health issues never known in my youth now proliferating unchecked, notably autism.

There again, some believe that "Big Pharma" long ago mislaid its moral compass and now operates to a commercial paradigm of keeping people sick and marketing them palliatives for "side effects"; whatever the truth of this, it seems to me that it doesn't bode well for any AI designed by humanity to outperform humanity - it might however extinguish humanity ...

(I'm leaving "quantum computing" out of this discussion because I understand next to nothing about it)

Anyway, the point I want to make is that there is not just one kind of AI, there are many, and more I suspect still to be invented.

For instance, technically the Statute Book can be regarded as an AI - it's a set of rules and regulations that Parliament has decreed must be followed, and is considered by some to be notoriously unresponsive to the reality that exists outside of the official brain-cells. Whilst writing an automated AI to match the specific factors of individual circumstance to determine the appropriate action that the Statute Book might demand could be useful in terms of accuracy of analysis and time to respond, it would still have to work its way through the case-book of legal precedent to see whether the courts might agree with its conclusions ... not theoretically impossible, but we begin to comprehend the complexity. And then what about the cases of ambiguity still to be brought before the courts?

Or would we prefer to be tried and released/convicted by the "Court AI", in which case we would be living within the Automated State - "Computer Says NO" on steroids, so to speak.

So for something completely different, take for instance an AI with the ability to play chess. This kind of AI has been faked(!) developed and strategised for years now, and it looks completely different to the latest not-general-purpose-enough AIs ...

So will the future of AI be an amalgam of many and various AI implementations that will somehow be melded into a single overarching general purpose AI?

I'll wait ...

Meanwhile there seems little doubt that AI in its various and probably ever-multiplying forms will be here to stay, and with these we must be prepared to live.

And that will require ensuring that we turn them to our advantage, and turn them away from our disadvantage.

That assuredly will pose difficulty enough for the incoming years.

Page 164 of 312