Featured

Tip - If you are using a phone, set the "Desktop Site" option in your browser

Is Ivermectin All It's Cracked up to Be?

Details: Category: Covid; Published: 18 August 2024; Hits: 815

2024-08-18

It would seem so - but does it have a nasty sting in the tail?

Interest of Justice (with a little help from Dr Mike Yeadon and Sage Hanna) examine the psychology, and find it ... interesting.

"Coincidences are genuinely rare. When they happen like this, you would be a mug to assume they’re innocent"

This is deep enough to make one seriously inclined to suggest that this is a rabbit-hole too far, that nobody would be that devious. Sadly, whilst this train of thought may have appeared reasonable only a few years ago, today we should perhaps have learned better.

Any project that appears to have invested heavily in fake "gain-of-function research" over multiple countries in a bid to cover the tracks of a fake pandemic caused by a fake virus (yes this sounds preposterous but it fits the known facts and is not disproven) is certainly capable of pulling this stunt alongside all that - after all, the additional cost would be trivial by comparison.

If you have been considering using Ivermectin then I suggest you should read this.

Yawn ...

Details: Category: Free Citizen; Published: 17 August 2024; Hits: 835

2024-08-17

OK, are you sitting comfortably? Are you having a lie down? Or are you busy getting on with life?

Well, pay attention, because the WHO has been working tirelessly to defend us from emerging perils, and has now discovered that (wait for it ... ) there is a new and dreadful virus that unless we all do exactly as the WHO tells us we will surely die!

Now look, I know that the last time they pulled this stunt it really did look for a time as though there really might have been an actual threat to world health, but sadly on that occasion it turned out to be a bit of a damp squib that only seemed to kill those at or around average life expectancy with assorted comorbidities. Even though governments around the world did their best to scare us all into compliance with fake tales of asymptomatic transmission, by labelling anybody who died of/with a positive test (which turned out to be absolutely fake) as death by Covid, and by making us all wear stupid ineffective masks that helped to turn mild respiratory infections into bacterial pneumonia - despite all this and lockdowns on top, the excess deaths from all causes remained stubbornly within normal ranges.

Well, until they started the quaxxine roll-outs anyway ...

So will this time around be any different?

Yes it will, but only if we pay no attention, and just continue to get on with our lives as normal.

If we take the bait this time then we will suffer the consequences: massive disruption, lethal quaxxines, spiralling death rates, and the end of civilisation as we know it.

So just keep calm, say no, and carry on, and it will all go away as if it was never there in the first place. Which if history is any guide, it wasn't.

Now I'm off for a snooze. Wake me when it's all over ...

(20 minutes)

Dislike this video here.

Road To Nuremberg 2: Fake PHEIC's - PCR Fraud Evidence With James Roguski & Interest of Justice

Whither Ukraine Now?

Details: Category: Defence; Published: 16 August 2024; Hits: 863

2024-08-16

Scott Ritter reviews (a) his brush with the FBI (30 minutes) and (b) the state of Russia's "special military operation", which NATO-Ukraine seem to be desperate to turn into a full-blown war by their invasion of Kursk.

(1 hr 26 + a tail section on Israel)

Like / Dislike this video here.

Whither Israel Now?

Details: Category: Defence; Published: 16 August 2024; Hits: 764

2024-08-16

Scott Ritter reviews the state of Israel's war with Hamas.

Wider war seems elusive (nobody wants it?) - and "peace" is becoming more expensive every day ...

(25 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

Durham Crown Court AWOL

Details: Category: Free Citizen; Published: 14 August 2024; Hits: 836

2024-08-14

Perhaps justice is not to be seen to be done these days.

The Family Courts were the first to routinely exclude the public from their proceedings on whatever flimsy excuse the parliamentarians of the day accepted as overriding the ancient maxim that justice must be seen to be done in order for the people to maintain their confidence in the judiciary.

Not to mention in order to protect the innocent from miscarriages of justice that may tear families apart on inadequate grounds unchallenged within the courtroom.

Is public confidence through open justice and protection of the innocent from unjust family dismemberment really less important than the possibility of hurt feelings and public embarrassment?

Crown Courts are of course not Family Courts, nevertheless Durham Crown Court seem to be peculiarly reticent to hear what would seem to be a perfectly normal if relatively minor case over army veteran Michael Humble's dispute with his local school. How could such a minor disagreement escalate into a court case in the first place?

Martin Geddes reports.

Page 168 of 312