Tip - If you are using a phone, set the "Desktop Site" option in your browser   

Featured

"E Solo Chao Novellum Oritur"

Details
Category: Free Citizen
Hits: 297

2025-10-09

Alert readers may notice the additional quote in our site masthead!

Clif High is an extraordinary polymath of vast learning and exceptional life experience. Following his teachings is also an exceptional experience, by which perhaps many may be unpersuaded, but which I find logically compelling as his notions fit in well with my intuitive (yet not so far very practical!) understanding of how this universe works.

The critical question (which perhaps Science as we know it gets backwards) is:

"Which acts as foundation for the other: consciousness or 3-dimensional matter?"

You may agree I think that the question is fundamental!

If consciousness is the foundation of matter, then it follows that if we wish to understand matter then we must first understand consciousness, whereas if somehow consciousness arises from matter then we must first understand the material universe (the default "scientific" approach).

If matter is derived from consciousness, then we arrive at an understanding (in some ways supported by "science") that "matter" is, despite our experience of it and relationship to it, only an illusion (perhaps along with "time" and "space").

The scientific approach as we know it has a nasty (and in my view quite unjustified) habit of dissociating itself from matters religious and/or spiritual, but I contend that no true science can neglect to understand and account for all facets of our universe - to arbitrarily exclude matters spiritual and religious is cowardly or ignorant, or both. What are these "scientists" afraid of? And how do they think that consciousness arises from matter? Have they actually observed it happening (other than from already living beings)?

Enough of my ramblings - Clif endorses the notion that the 3D universe and all its content (a.k.a. "gritology") arises from consciousness (a.k.a. "the ontology") - a currently revolutionary notion that reverses the foundational assumptions of modern science. If we would explore the ensuing ramifications then I know of no better guide than Clif High.

But please be prepared to accommodate his perhaps overly "spicy" style of language. He's only human after all ...

 

Will Future Prove Past?

Details
Category: Free Citizen
Hits: 325

2025-10-09

Did Wilhelm Reich photograph living viruses in the 1930s?

Regular readers will be familiar with our (and Mike Yeadon's) suggestion that modern-day viruses are a hoax put about by the industry in order to justify injecting the healthy with their products - the healthy being a much larger population than the already sick, and thus present the potential for bigger profits by several orders of magnitude!

If Wilhelm was photographing live viruses in vivo, (and destroying them with pin-point accuracy by bio resonance!) doesn't that prove us wrong?

Unlikely for several reasons - but primarily that Big Pharma went to some trouble to ensure that his discoveries were never to be developed, because they would have made the pharmaceutical industry obsolete. Big Pharma's version of virology isn't based on Wilhelm Reich's research, so if his story is correct, their's is BS.

You can read his story here, courtesy of Fall of the Cabal's Cyntha Koeter.

Onward and upward!

 

Nothing New Under the Sun

Details
Category: Conspiracy
Hits: 279

2025-10-09

So here's the geopolitical news re the Middle East of yesteryear, direct from "Whitehall" ... looks like nothing much has changed, other than things getting immeasurably worse.

(4 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

 

The High Court has Normalised this ... Abomination

Details
Category: Free Citizen
Hits: 301

2025-10-09

Come on Martin Geddes, don't hang back, tell us what you really think.

"Proof now follows punishment. Judicial names have become decorative. Mercy and proportionality are excised as inefficiencies. The law that once restrained power now operationalises extraction"

But they'd never get away with it!

"In the vocabulary of legality, it all sounds reasonable. In the language of conscience, it is extortion with paperwork"

So Justice is now subordinate to Jim Hacker's Department of Administrative Affairs?

"Yes, Prime Minister, it's so much more convenient and streamlined ... "

 

The What? The Internet Governance Forum? What's That?

Details
Category: Free Citizen
Hits: 286

2025-10-09

If you haven't guessed already, it's a initiative of the UN to make sure that this shamefully unruly internet is brought under control. It's chaos out there!

Of course it is. It reflects the preoccupations desires and forebodings of all imperfect humanity, so what else could it be?

But obviously the "Great and the Good" at the UN consider that it's their job to step up to govern the world so that humanity can be tamed, controlled, ID'ed and brought to order - their order of course. They are experts so can do as they like.

But can the inexpert living plebs of this planet coordinate a response that might tip the balance back toward humanity and a chaos-tolerant variant of the net?

Perhaps it's still up for grabs ...

 

Page 108 of 408