Tip - If you are using a phone, set the "Desktop Site" option in your browser
Featured
Another View from Gaza
- Details
- Category: Free Citizen
- Hits: 142
2023-11-25
This is another opinion from personal experience of the Hamas/Gaza/Israel problem.
He strikes me as sincere, and his viewpoints are from his own very direct experience. And his experience is from both sides of the fence.
Whether he draws the correct conclusions from his experience is something to ponder - the Deep State runs very deep and knows no national boundaries. We know that their modus operandi is to play both sides to achieve their ends, and to state that doesn't invalidate anything presented here.
"Hamas without chaos cannot survive"
(5 minutes)
Like / Dislike this video here.
Together Takes the Argument Into Parliament
- Details
- Category: Free Citizen
- Hits: 160
2023-11-25
" 'Clean' Air, Dirty Money, Filthy Politics is the second joint report produced by Climate Debate and Together and reveals how a small number of the world’s billionaires are shaping UK air pollution policies by funding partisan groups to the tune of hundreds of millions of pounds"
Andrea Jenkins MP introduces Ben Pile's report to MPs.
How did that happen?
" ... they're not running these pledges past the voters ... "
I wonder why not ...
I looked for their membership list but found the FAQs, however, I found their membership list here.
Check if your council is signed up, bookmark the page and check back regularly - they are still expanding ...
(34 minutes)
Like / Dislike this video here.
Is it Ethical to Suppress the Consideration of Ethics?
- Details
- Category: Censorship
- Hits: 138
2023-11-25
Read the title again.
Then wonder how such a question is even possible.
But it gets even worse.
The story of the suppression is itself (allegedly) being suppressed ...
Yes, you guessed, Covid comes into the mix here.
But read it for yourself, and form your own viewpoint.
The Effects of WiFi - Should we be Worried?
- Details
- Category: 5G & EMFs
- Hits: 127
2023-11-23
There is a lot of knowledge these days about the downside risks of high frequency radiation - especially of ionizing radiations such as gamma rays and x-rays.
There are many who report that lower non-ionizing frequencies can also be damaging. But surely the WiFi frequencies that are now ubiquitous and allow convenient connection to the internet can't be damaging? After all, it's everywhere!
Well, after watching this you may well not wish to let your child use a laptop actually on their lap - where it's very close to their reproductive organs, and damage there may render them sterile, unable to have children. No, this isn't new news either, it's actually old news, but as with so much news of this type these days, it seems that the relevant authorities are inexplicably (I believe that is the acceptable term) deaf to all such warnings.
In fact, are WiFi frequencies the worst possible choice for our health?
(15 minutes)
For more information, see the Environmental Health Trust website.
Debate the Emotions - WW3 Depends on Us
- Details
- Category: Free Citizen
- Hits: 135
2023-11-22
I'm all for rational debate, but when the emotions overrule the preparedness to listen, rational debate becomes ... difficult.
The Israel vs Hamas debate has a high emotional content on both sides which doesn't actually facilitate the exchange of ideas and arguments in reasoned debate, because the protagonists are far more focused on making their own points than on listening to their opponents points and forming rational responses.
Surely this is why we have rules of debate in parliaments and in the United Nations that focus on allowing each in turn to have their say, uninterrupted.
When reporters take sides and become emotionally driven protagonists in the debate, journalism suffers. If their audience is to have a fair chance to calmly weigh the pros and cons presented by each side, then they need to conduct themselves to favour rational debate over and above the need to score points for "their team".
Still, full marks to Avi for publishing this debate, as far as it goes, on YouTube.
(26 minutes)
Like / Dislike this video here.
In terms of the actual debate, much hinges on whether Israel has the right to firstly self defence, and secondly, if so, is its response justified?
Both points are contentious. Many will and do reflexively concede the first and argue the second, because everyone has the right to defend themselves, right? And the Hamas attack was an act of terrorism, right? So the answer is clear - but - are matters really so simple?
Scott Ritter thinks differently, and explains exactly why he thinks it (albeit also rather over-emotionally - but his arguments bear hearing, and I suggest watching right to the end).
We are not talking here of our personal feelings or even personal conduct, we are talking of the international consensus on the rules of acceptable / "lawful" conduct in war. In this case, the history goes back at least 75 years, and takes some unravelling.
As always, it's our viewpoints that count, but we should check out both sides of the debate before making up our minds. World War 3 may depend upon our decisions.
- More on EMF Dangers in the Energy Bill - Effective but Neither Safe nor Insurable
- If Your Dreams Don't Scare You ...
- Banking Collapse - Real or Fake?
- What of Reality in the Middle East?
- Fifteen New Cities Incoming?
- Is Trump All He's Cracked Up to Be?
- The End of the World as We Have Known It?
- Global Financial Crash / Nesara - Gesara Imminent?
- Report from Acapulco - "Devastation"
- Prison Planet
Page 31 of 123