Conspiracy Corner

2025-01-28

The Brownstone Institute reviews a number of "the Donald" 's executive orders that have slapped a wide-ranging communications ban on the US public health bureaucracies.

One might speculate that investigative measures may follow in due course, with consequences that only a few outside of the medical-pharmaceutical-public-health bureaucracies may foresee.

"One Health, as newly embraced by the CDC, amounts to a radical transformation of the basis of social order itself, under the guidance of god-like scientists who alone know how to structure the best life for all living things"

"How it came to be that our main engines of public health came to be captured in whole by such a crazed ideology would require a deep and expansive investigation"

"Now Dr.... heads the agency he defied. He remains in that position until the man once called a “fringe epidemiologist” by the previous head of NIH takes

2025-01-28

"May you live in interesting times"

Are the times interesting enough for you yet?

If not, then perhaps you haven't been paying attention.

Personally I would settle for a little less wind and rain and a bit more global warming, but what do I know?

"Trump intends to use his presidential right to declare a state of emergency (!) thereby providing the conditions to fast-track the plans and put them into action"

"We stand at the brink of what we call here the intelligent age, where artificial intelligence... will fundamentally transform economic systems, business models and personal lifestyles"

"... Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research... has developed a prototype for

2025-01-28

Have you ever wondered (as I have) why archaeologists seem to be obsessed by the idea that ancient sites were used for the purpose of child sacrifice?

There are I suppose two possible explanations for this -

1: these sites really were used for this purpose and the activity must have been quite ubiquitous over different places and ages

2: modern-day archaeologists have an inexplicable but unfounded obsession with the idea that simply won't go away

Now what's past is past and what's done is done, but what if this problem remains endemic in our time also? 

There are concerning indications that this may be the case, and

2025-01-27

Clif High lays out his personal view of how the power to control the planet may evolve over the coming year(s).

If we think that the old World Order is somehow going to continue, then we may need to reconsider.

This isn't to suggest that his apocalyptic vision is necessarily incoming either very soon or at all, but it does represent another part of the spectrum of possibilities that we may need to contend with. I judge Clif to be a very experienced guy who has knowledge and abilities well beyond the common man (although he doesn't kindly take prisoners!) so his views are likely worth noting, even if we consider both them and his style of presentation to be politically incorrect.

2025-01-27

Given that much of what appears in the press can no longer be taken at face value, and every politician worthy of note (or not) seems to be working to a concealed agenda (or not), it's become more or less impossible to come to conclusions about what any one of them may be up to, let alone forecast how the whole may resolve to bring us our future.

Especially given the breakneck speed at which the new Trump administration is breaking ground and breaking politicians such as presidents and prime ministers alike. It was hard enough to keep up before 20th January. 

Let's just say that this is a time when we all need a certain amount of faith that the Universe has our best interests at heart.

"Trust and verify" as used to be the motto of UN disarmament inspectors...

This for what it may be worth is Ben's viewpoint that he feels able to release in public this week. Whether we agree with everything is up to us... 

2025-01-27

Legal processes are infamous for lack of rapidity, and it's clear that time is required to make proper investigations and ensure that the arguments are properly presented and logically resolved. When the outcome will affect people's lives, that much can be agreed upon and should be uncontroversial.

It's a great shame therefore that the same thoroughness of approach was evidently not considered applicable to the Covid "pandemic" situation, when the WHO and all national authorities down to your local authority fell over themselves to introduce novel pandemic countermeasures not based on any previously accepted pandemic policies, and then to rush novel technology "vaccines" into the arms of everybody worldwide who could be persuaded or cajoled into accepting them.

That those whose traditional function was to "speak truth unto power" and to "hold authorities to account" should have inverted those functions to uncritically support the authorities "come what may" was indeed a surprise, a surprise that

2025-01-27

A everybody no doubt realises, Baroness Hallett's "Covid Inquiry Module 4" hearings grind on, succumbing to handy confusions over terminology which would be unacceptable in a school debating society.

Are the differences between Process 1 and Process 2 the same as the differences between Processes A and B?

I suppose it depends on how closely and confidently you were able to attend and decipher the long and rambling question.

"The inquiry has thus enabled a situation where the primary failing of the MHRA has apparently been denied. The truth can now be dismissed as yet another ‘conspiracy theory’ "

Happily for us mere mortals, the Perseus Group (who they?) has form in questioning the response of the UK medical regulators to the Covid alleged pandemic, and

2025-01-27

No, apparently his case has not fallen by the wayside, it is progressing on the basis of factual discovery.

Of course that means a delay whilst the necessary facts are discovered, and brought before the Court, but hey, that can't be too difficult for our safety-conscious no-stones-unturned medical-pharmaceutical-political complex can it? 

They have been given 3 days (until tomorrow 28th January).

Place your bets now...

2025-01-23

"Chris Whitty... told the Covid Inquiry this week that the decision to mandate Covid jabs was “100 per cent a political one” and he was "sceptical" of it"

"Has the public health establishment at least learned something from the last few years?"

If nothing else, these last few years have permitted the "public health establishment" in all its varied forms to demonstrate that they are totally immune to all criticism, whether justified or not. Immune even to the Nuremberg Codes that declared unequivocally that anybody to be subjected to a medical experiment must be (a) fully informed of the risks (b) free to decline to take part. They were coerced at every turn into taking an experimental intervention described as a "vaccine" which was in fact a largely untested gene therapy that turned out to confer no stoppage of onward transmission and negligible effective

2025-01-22

From the name itself, one might think of UFOs / UAPs, or some science-fiction portal concept. The truth seems to be more prosaic, but just as topical and probably just as much misunderstood:

AI

But not just any AI...

Conspiracy Sarah asks the relevant question - what could (possibly) go wrong?

Does Trump believe this stuff?

Or is he indulging his favoured tactic of putting likely miscreants squarely into the limelight for investigation by the public? And if he isn't, it's a good bet that there will be no shortage of public volunteers who will oblige anyway, given the current reputation of the mRNA shots

2025-01-22

A timely reminder that Davos is still a thing, although whether "of beauty and a joy for ever" may be debatable. 

What tedious extrusions of verbiage must we decode this year? Sadly the event may have been overshadowed by that other show unfolding over in Washington-no-longer-DC (?) that seems to be attracting much global media coverage. Whether the attracted levels of interest are due to the contrasting styles of the chief protagonists, or to the likely success of their respective endeavours, is a question that may be pondered. Time will tell.

See the full timetable here, courtesy of Interest of Justice.

Be sure to mark your calendar to make sure you don't miss your favourite items!

2025-01-22

The continuing UK Covid Inquiry has been, some believe, just a gargantuan whitewash exercise in favour of the team that brought us the Covid "pandemic".

The US too has had its own version of the Covid Inquiry, so how does it fare by comparison? And does anybody care? Should anybody care?

In my view, yes we should, because right or wrong, it betrays much about current thinking and therefore likely future "pandemic" planning. Will such be based upon firmer ground than last time?

We on this site have made our views clear, that the whole operation was a simple scam based upon blatant manipulation of the statistics on a global scale, a manipulation designed to divert attribution of the normal seasonal winter deaths away from the normal flu-like and towards the SARS-Cov-2 Covid label; yet even so a scam so tricky that perhaps it threatened to expose another vastly greater scam, that in turn threatened the reputation and future of almost the entire

2025-01-21

Are you a living breathing human being, with family, friends, acquaintances, aspirations, skills, qualifications, life history, health issues, and opinions that have all been hard-come-by?

Or are you a 64-bit sequence of ones and zeroes on a computer database somewhere "in the cloud"?

Would you prefer to deal with another flesh and blood human being, capable of recognising you for what you are, and your circumstances for what they are, or should you just quote your id number to an AI system that has somebody else's values and objectives (not necessarily known to you) built into its code?

"The Open Society, the Gates Foundation, the Bilderberg Group, the Council on Foreign Relations, they are in direct control of the UK"

The problems with government are actually many, but the primary problem is that they want to govern.

...

2025-01-20

Once more Martin Geddes shares his thoughts, this time on today's event, what it may portend, and how he feels at the end of a number of years reacting to the unfolding events, and the understandings that they have spawned.

That he has been brave enough and understanding enough to share much of that journey with us is in itself quite heroic - that he has left us with his work on the Q phenomenon and much else besides leaves us with a debt that we cannot repay, and that he had already forgiven.

We can only try to live up to our own destinies with similar fortitude and generosity.

Today is the Day.

2025-01-20

Goodbye old world, Hello new world, same as the old world?

So we stand at the precipice, yet it's too early to tell for sure how things will develop.

Certainly the ceasefire in Gaza is a positive sign that demonstrates an unlikely level of leverage over an intransigent regime that has myopically and single-mindedly pursued its inglorious aims of expansion and domination ever since the now infamous Balfour Declaration appeared in the wake of the end of WW2. 

Yet the verdict of the American people in the 2024 election has broken a logjam.

Clearly something new is up, but what exactly that is will only be unveiled over time. The geopolitical world has many moving parts, some of which have been immobile and rusting for far too long to now spring swiftly and surely into action - the makers of WD40 should make a killing!

Read

2025-01-19

Dr David Martin tells it like it is - once more.

Let us pray that he doesn't have to say it again.

(26 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2025-01-19

"Grooming Gang" territories, to mention three not at random.

These are murky waters wherein the judicial authorities intersected with local and national politicians, police, and indeed the press, evidently to suppress the criminal tragedies that took place over many years.

Consequently, informed and considered discussion about these matters is difficult to find, and prone to degenerate into political point-scoring which isn't productive.

So I welcome this interview between Peter Whittle and Simon Danczuk, a former Labour MP for Rochdale, who gamely answers Peter's questions as best he could - nobody comes out of this topic totally smelling of roses, but it is the sort of discussion that actually does advance our understanding of what took place, how and why, and what might now be best done about it.

You may or may not agree with everything said, but they do bring out some highly pertinent

2025-01-18

The Roman Catholic Church is infamous for its past activities that led to much suffering and death for those honest enough to make up their own minds about its doctrines and to live their lives accordingly. That isn't to suggest that other denominations were always blameless!

Rather than using such diverse opinions as learning opportunities for both parties, the Church sought to stamp them out in manner calculated to scare possible adherents to shut up and conform at least outwardly to Catholic dogma.

But was the Church ever about saving the faithful, or was it set up by the Roman Emperor of the time to corral those unruly Christians under the reliable leadership of his own bishops? Which motivation aligns with the Inquisition?

One may at least ask similar questions of the social media giants of today - were they set up to promote unfettered legal freedom of speech for the masses, or were they created by the CIA so that governments worldwide could

2025-01-17

As a blast from the past, few come as stormy as David Icke.

And few come as pointedly difficult to disagree with.

Do watch for a cracking video clip, delivered without any sense of irony, that just has to be seen to be believed.

A recommended commentary on the current state of the world. It's your viewpoint that counts.

(41 minutes)

2025-01-17

Well, obviously, when it's a whitewash.

That's rather a blunt start to any article, but I feel that it sets the right tone.

And it's not really even controversial - after all, everything about the Covid "pandemic" has been corrupted from the start, so why should the inquiry in the aftermath be any different?

So specifically for those who can't tear their attention away from this sophisticated study into how the great and the good persist in manipulating a public inquiry to ensure that it produces the desired favourable results, HART bring us their commentary on "Module 4 Vaccines and therapeutics day 1 Tuesday 14th of January".

Enjoy.

The rest of us will no doubt find no shortage of more useful learnings to