Tip - If you are using a phone, set the "Desktop Site" option in your browser   

The Unelected

  • Russia Russia Russia

    2026-08-31

    Prof David Miller on MOATS.

    Make of this what you will...

    (21 minutes)

    Like/Dislike this video here.

     

  • A Case That Somehow Slipped Beneath the Media's Notice

    2026-08-29

    This is not Party Politics (despite Robin Tilbrook being chairman of the English Democrats).

    It is a case of national concern, and giving recognition where it is due.

    Between Robin Tilbrook's court case and Rupert Lowe's private inquiry, the government was caught in a pincer on the topic of rape gangs.

    Make of it what you will.

     

  • Please Adjust Your Perception of Reality

    2026-08-28

    (34 minutes)

    Like / Dislike this video here.

     

  • How Long Before Our Real Government Gets the War it Has Always Wanted??

    2026-08-28

    The UK governments of all stripes have been supporting (some might say stoking) the war in Ukraine for many years. Boris even went to the Ukraine, apparently to scupper the early peace talks  with Russia.

    Moscow is "hinting" that Russia is about to call their bluff.

    "Zakharova urged "all residents of the United Kingdom to think about the inevitable, catastrophic consequences of the hostile steps taken by their own authorities"

    Should we be worried?

     

  • Is Out of Court Settlement Really justice?

    2026-08-28

    When mega-corporations buy their way out of a lawsuit by "settling" for a sum of money out of court, who wins?

    Does the public, or even "the greater good" (for whom the authorities notionally work) win?

    What price lack of disclosure in court? What price the uncovering of the truth?

    What price the covering up of the truth?

    What is more important in a public interest case: truth and disclosure, or money?

    Interest of Justice are very clear about this, but who was party to the cover-up?

     

     

  • And Now for Something Completely Different

    2026-08-27

    Brendon O'Connell is nothing if not fiercely independent.

    I don't think he agrees with anybody, but he isn't following anybody else's line. So he brings something independent along with him (as far as anybody can tell these days anyway) so he is worth listening to, if you can follow his eclectic mix of AI produced video and his habit of hopping from one argument to another without much of a warning.

    Still, he's good training for the independent viewer, with a style very different form almost everyone else. 

    Make of him what you will.

     

  • Government of the People, By the People, For the People

    2026-08-26

    So if the people themselves are the government as this implies, what need we of a separate government?

    If the people could keep order amongst themselves, why do we need to elect a government?

    The true meaning of "anarchy" is "no government".

    Not necessarily "no order".

    It's an idea we must explore because such exploration would either confirm or deny our need for a government of people as opposed to government by the people themselves through local methods  practices and/or institutions.

    Given that almost nobody thinks our current system of central governments that naturally accrete all powers to themselves is at all satisfactory, and indeed seems to be approaching its final stages of corruption and decomposition, perhaps we should accord such an

    ...
  • The Origins of American Medical Hegemony

    2026-08-26

    It is widely agreed that science advances by the scientific method, whereby all are engaged  in the search for truth and theories stand until they fall, either to logic, or to experimentation, or to observed behaviour that improves or even disqualifies the theory.

    Theories that stand the test of time gain wide acceptance but are not "proven" in the sense that they cannot possibly be improved by a better theory - that option is always recognised as a possibility.

    For this process to succeed, scientists must challenge the status quo. Thus was Newton's theory of gravity displaced by maverick Albert Einstein's theories of relativity.

    So one might deduce that the maverick who dares to challenge the status quo is indispensable to the advancement of true science. One might well be right, as this position is entirely logical.

    The Psychopathic Deep State

    2026-08-25

    How the authoritarian world works, according to Dr Sansone.

    (29 minutes)

     

  • A New Start for Education?

    2026-08-25

    Words of wisdom from Mark Attwood on education. And more, of course.

    (16 minutes)

    Like / Dislike this video here.

     

  • When Court Judgements Stray Off-Piste 2

    2026-08-25

    This follows on from When Court Judgements Stray Off-Piste, an American case concerning child custody, in which he had a passing involvement which turned out to be significant.

    Who knew that apparently straightforward court cases could be so nuanced? 

    And nuances there are aplenty, enough indeed for the three further articles that Martin Geddes offers.

    Two smoking guns, and just one envelope

    What the two smoking guns reveal

    ...

  • The Year the Earth Stood Still

    2026-08-24

    With conflicting signals about what's actually going on beneath the abundant surface noise, making sense of who is on which side and which side is in the ascendant, even how many sides there actually are, is what one might consider an inexact science.

    Nevertheless the parallels between the Day the Earth Stood Still and today's mood of expectant hiatus are pronounced.

    Well-connected and experienced as he may be, Ben Fulford is probably no more able to foretell the future than anybody else, but he possibly is better informed than most.

    Once again this week's offering is substantially pre-written, and serves to remind us how the world came into our current predicament. Perhaps it also offers pointers to the future...

    (Modest

    ...
  • So, How Goes WW3?

    2026-08-24

    For those of you who don't understand the question, best move on to another topic.

    Or you could dive in but only if you're prepared to turn your whole outlook on life upside down and empty it all over the floor - and then to do what it takes to put a new outlook on life together again (over time - it takes time... ).

    Still with us? Bravo!

    (66 minutes)

    Like / Dislike this video here.

     

  • Who's In Charge in the USA?

    2026-08-23

    Secretary Bessent is making the running - if you want to know how this ends, follow the money...

    "... you can't rig everything all at once... "

    (54 minutes)

    Like / Dislike this video here.

     

  • Tonsillitis

    2026-08-23

    This is an explanation that you probably won't hear from your doctor.

    I can't say whether or not it is correct, but given the general accuracy of official medical advice these days I personally wouldn't bet against it. 

    What is Tonsillitis?

     

  • When Court Judgments Stray Off-Piste

    2026-08-22

    Martin Geddes analyses an American Court Case to pin-point the salient points at which judgement appears to have strayed.

    Not because he wants it reviewed (maybe he does, maybe he doesn't) but because it's instructive to illustrate the various ways in which judgement can stray.


    2026-08-23

    Constitutional Cluedo.

     

  • The Heart of the Matter

    2026-08-22

    Things your Cardiologist may not tell you.

    Modern medicine isn't there for our benefit - it's there for the benefit of the medical industry.

    Of course the medical industry needs to make a profit, but likewise the people who use its products need a cure. Somehow that last part gets marginalised, and the main marginalisers are the government regulators whose task is to regulate. The chain between patient and medical industry is controlled by governments of all shapes and sizes, and in private practice by insurance companies. Sometimes by both!

    The patient's only control is his/her choice whether or not to use a medical product or take medical advice from the qualified experts. Because governments and insurance companies interpose themselves between between the patient and the medical professions, we the people pay through our taxes and insurance premiums whether or not we choose to take the advice and/or treatments on offer.

    ...

  • Double Conspiracy !

    2026-08-22

    Mark Attwood talks to Shaun Attwood, both in their own way well-qualified conspiracy theorists, so if that's not your bag, what are you doing on this site?!

    Seriously though, it's a bit slow to start but but it warms up nicely. A lot of ground is covered, some of which probably is new to somebody.

    And hey, it's all conspiracy theories so make of them what you will. And if YT doesn't take this one down then we really are in new territory...

    (60 minutes)

    Like / Dislike thus video

    ...
  • Interest of Justice - Update 19 Aug 26

    2026-08-21

    Interest of Justice filed a lawsuit in Washington DC to which the government had 90 days to respond.

    That 90 days are up, but they now have another 60 days due to "procedural error" in the original filing.

    That puts the expected hearing in the same time window as the Netherlands civil case against Albert Bourla et al in Leeuwarden.

    IoJ brings us up to date.


    Plus another article on related matters.

     

  • This Could Happen to You

    2026-08-21

    The latest communication from Mark Sexton pulls a number of threads together based on investigations carried out by Ian Clayton (Ethical Approach UK).

    It concerns the government's enforcements of its Covid policies, and raises further serious questions about the legal basis for those enforcement operations, alongside Operation Talla.

    "Does this expose a collaborative effort to target Solicitors and Doctors who get in the way of the government, Covid and its vaccine program?"

    (9 minutes)

    Read the report THE CASE OF PHILIP HYLAND EXAMINED