2025-11-26
First up, a plea from Mark Attwood to those NHS and other medical staff who now realise that maybe, just maybe, inoculating the public at large with novel medical technology that
- had been developed "at warp speed" within months whilst earlier vaccines had required years of testing,
- had not been approved for general use except under an Emergency Use Authorisation,
- to allegedly defend against the "emergency" of a deadly "pandemic" that had no statistically significant effect upon the normally expected rate of "deaths from all causes",
- which overwhelmingly "killed" people with comorbidities at around their expected lifespan, and had no measurable effect on children who were nevertheless inoculated anyway,
- which was administered without any pretence at "informed consent", and indeed for some people under coercion,
- and for everybody, under a pervasive institutional psychological campaign to instill an unwarranted pathological fear of "the pandemic"
was
a) Not a good idea
b) Would likely entail unacceptable risks
c) Would leave doctors and medical staff open to criminal charges under the Nuremberg Codes
If you now realise this failure, it's not too late to come clean, admit it, and act accordingly. It will drive another nail into the pandemic narrative's coffin, and it really is your own judgement that will now count.
Secondly: Following on from a previous article, Interest of Justice reminds us how the pandemic was a fraud, that the WHO failed to defend itself in Costa Rica:
"The significance of this institutional testimony lies in its establishment of mens rea—the requisite mental element for establishing that the violations were not inadvertent policy failures but rather deliberate institutional actions undertaken with full knowledge of the legal and medical implications"
"The Costa Rican Constitutional Chamber has rendered decisions establishing that governmental actions violated constitutional protections. International litigation mechanisms are now examining state obligations under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Disciplinary proceedings against governmental and institutional actors are proceeding through multiple jurisdictions. The vindication, though delayed, is becoming institutional reality."
Quite so.
Stand with them if you can. This won't happen without public support. Not only do "many hands make light work", in this case "many hands make legal history".
Be part of it!
