2025-01-14
Shortly to get its second reading in Parliament, this is another Bill to usurp the power of legislation to drive the Climate Change project, removing our essential freedoms, and forcing our obedience to WEF-UN inspired NGOs and assorted other busy-bodies who would compel our compliance "for our safety" - all whilst bypassing the need for further legislation.
Welcome to the New World Climate Emergency Dictatorship.
It's yet another way to tell us that it's all totally democratic because we voted these numskulls into office, so now we must do as they say.
The fact that whichever main party we voted for at summer 2024 General Election we were going to get a government dominated (by whatever means) by the UN-WEF global bureaucracy is neither here nor there - in practical terms we didn't get the choice.
We had to have a referendum before we could leave the clammy embrace of the EU - I submit that the measures being put about to secure Climate Safety are an order of magnitude more significant than leaving of the EU, therefore we must have at least a referendum on these proposals, a mere private members bill slipped through Parliament on the nod is totally inadequate.
We may end up cold, and hungry for some sort of familiar nutritious food (if we have the power to cook it) but we wlll have been "saved" from a massive temperature rise (of 1.5oC) - according to "our" politicians that all somehow seem to agree with the UN-WEF partnership.
(21 minutes)
(Yes, I know this guy is party political, but at least his party does seem to be well-grounded in logic and evidence)
Like / Dislike this video here.
Once you have sampled some the inevitable verbiage, you may wish to review Words Matter, or Word Matters; it's a Humpty Dumpty world at heart these days.
See also: "The Path to Net Zero" - a report by the Climate Assembly UK. You can argue that they are somehow "representative" of the people, but they are not democratic representatives, they are more aptly described as a focus group - in the UK, last I heard, we use elections to choose our representatives.
The danger that unrepresentative groups such as Climate Assembly UK and the UN's bodies such as the IPCC will be used by ministers and courts to enforce unpopular measures inferred but not specified under the provisions of the Climate and Nature Bill should be recognised. That would be the equivalent of handing carte blanche to powers external to the UK, a situation that has already been tested through our now terminated membership of the EU, and found wanting.
Note: Lastly, even the Climate Catastrophists recognise that the authoritarian path to "climate safety" isn't necessarily the most appropriate route to take.