Featured

Tip - If you are using a phone, set the "Desktop Site" option in your browser

The Climate and Nature Bill

Details: Category: Green; Published: 14 January 2025; Hits: 982

2025-01-14

Shortly to get its second reading in Parliament, this is another Bill to usurp the power of legislation to drive the Climate Change project, removing our essential freedoms, and forcing our obedience to WEF-UN inspired NGOs and assorted other busy-bodies who would compel our compliance "for our safety" - all whilst bypassing the need for further legislation.

Welcome to the New World Climate Emergency Dictatorship.

It's yet another way to tell us that it's all totally democratic because we voted these numskulls into office, so now we must do as they say.

The fact that whichever main party we voted for at summer 2024 General Election we were going to get a government dominated (by whatever means) by the UN-WEF global bureaucracy is neither here nor there - in practical terms we didn't get the choice.

We had to have a referendum before we could leave the clammy embrace of the EU - I submit that the measures being put about to secure Climate Safety are an order of magnitude more significant than leaving of the EU, therefore we must have at least a referendum on these proposals, a mere private members bill slipped through Parliament on the nod is totally inadequate.

We may end up cold, and hungry for some sort of familiar nutritious food (if we have the power to cook it) but we wlll have been "saved" from a massive temperature rise (of 1.5^oC) - according to "our" politicians that all somehow seem to agree with the UN-WEF partnership.

(21 minutes)

(Yes, I know this guy is party political, but at least his party does seem to be well-grounded in logic and evidence)

Like / Dislike this video here.

Once you have sampled some the inevitable verbiage, you may wish to review Words Matter, or Word Matters; it's a Humpty Dumpty world at heart these days.

See also: "The Path to Net Zero" - a report by the Climate Assembly UK. You can argue that they are somehow "representative" of the people, but they are not democratic representatives, they are more aptly described as a focus group - in the UK, last I heard, we use elections to choose our representatives.

The danger that unrepresentative groups such as Climate Assembly UK and the UN's bodies such as the IPCC will be used by ministers and courts to enforce unpopular measures inferred but not specified under the provisions of the Climate and Nature Bill should be recognised. That would be the equivalent of handing carte blanche to powers external to the UK, a situation that has already been tested through our now terminated membership of the EU, and found wanting.

Note: Lastly, even the Climate Catastrophists recognise that the authoritarian path to "climate safety" isn't necessarily the most appropriate route to take.

Fulford Report - Monday 13 January 2025 - War in LA?

Details: Category: Free Citizen; Published: 13 January 2025; Hits: 470

2025-01-13

Of course the prime focus this week is on the fires in LA - the similarities with the fires in Maui at Lahaina being noted.

The difference of course is that the victims in Maui were not from the affluent classes, so maybe the motivations were more complex ...

An informative article this week, as usual covering multiple topics.

(Modest subscription required for full access)

The Covid Jabs Evidence of Harms Explained in Comprehensible Bites

Details: Category: Covid; Published: 12 January 2025; Hits: 685

2025-01-12

This site has maintained that the Covid "pandemic" was a hoax from beginning to end.

Why? Because "they" went to absurd lengths to fix the statistics to make it appear so. If there was a real pandemic, why the need?

Dr Yeadon even believes that the whole "science" of virology is unproven, which would set the cat amongst the pigeons big time. I don't go as far as to assert that, since I don't have the evidence, but I suspect that he's right ...

There is so much apparently wrong with the Covid jabs that we might feel non-plussed about where to start.

Dr Mike Yeadon (whom I have followed since 2020) has done a lot of good work in this area, and you can find his substack here.

James Roguski has also set up a series of recent articles which address the evidence of the harms on his substack here - a nice list of topics to peruse, all handily in one place, plus a mine of relevant information, just don't try to absorb it all at once!

(41 minutes)

Feel free to dip in and read as often or whenever you wish.

There are many others, but how much time do you have?

Lastly, some believe that the pandemic was a ruse to commit heinous crime - I say this to indicate that greater legal minds than mine believe this to be so, and have reported their accusations with evidence to the police.

This case covers much common ground with Mark Sexton's case that was also submitted to the police for investigation. To my knowledge neither case has yet come to anything although they were linked to ensure that each has a full set of evidence. The long grass is clearly working overtime now.

Dr Roger Hodkinson Speaks to Anna Brees about Covid

Details: Category: Covid; Published: 11 January 2025; Hits: 729

2025-01-11

This article comes with a large trigger warning.

The implications that arise out of this discussion are likely devastating to our prospects as a population, and Dr Hodkinson doesn't shirk them. Anyone who believes that Covid and all its works are behind us may well be in for a most unwelcome awakening over time, as more effects of the jabs emerge.

This is Part 2 of the interview, and features a lively exchange between Roger and Anna, in many ways quite lively enough to cause the discussion to miss / skip over a number of pertinent points, all in Roger's favour in my view (I have noted them below the video).

Take a deep breath, keep calm, and carry on ...

(39 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

(You can view Part 1 of this interview here)

Notes about the Covid scare:

The test by which Covid was diagnosed was and is risible - all medical tests give a certain level of false results, and there was never any reason to rely on a test that utilised a technique whose inventor stated should never be used to diagnose any illness, because its design was inherently unsuitable. This test could be expected (given imprecise specification and lack of control over the ultimate application) to generate false results by the bucket-load.

Covid deaths were not Covid deaths - they changed the rules to ensure that for any death within 28 or so days of a positive test result, Covid was recorded as cause of death. Every patient hospitalised was tested on admission and regularly thereafter. The inevitable false positives were bound to skew the recorded cause of death towards Covid.

It was established that Covid patients were being given unsuitable treatment in care homes and hospitals - morphine and midazolam, and/or mechanical ventilation, and at some point remdesivir, all of which are injurious to health in a patient who has respiratory challenges. It really isn't unreasonable to suspect that this may have been deliberate, given that "death by Covid" seems to be indicated as a desired outcome throughout the pandemic.

NB: Prior to the vaccine roll-out, the average age of those who "died of Covid" was slightly higher than average life expectancy - so maybe the elderly were simply dying as normal, but their deaths were being misattributed to Covid.

The Republic Restored

Details: Category: Free Citizen; Published: 10 January 2025; Hits: 722

2025-01-10

"We have not had a Republic since at least 1871 .. "

"We the people have been brainwashed, programmed, tricked ... "

" ... NO! We are the government, 'We the People' ... "

" How do you have a Territory get a Statehood? Here's the checklist ... "

" They were able by November 2010 to get the Republic restored "

" ... he was on President Biden's clemency list ... "

(57 minutes)

Page 129 of 313