Free Citizen

 2025-11-30

We have been here before, but never as deeply nor pervasively .

The British Isles as history will attest has never been immune from trouble and strife, most recently in Northern Ireland, and before that the previous matter was settled at Culloden - but not truly settled until the English Ordnance Survey mapped the territory of Scotland so that any further rebellions could be pursued through mapped and understood terrain. Our highly prized Ordnance Survey maps beloved of ramblers and campers alike were born of conflict.

Which is no reason to want another such conflict.

Yet governments around the western world seem hell-bent on creating circumstances likely to lead to conflict anew, by importing others of any culture but our own and any religion but our historic Church of England - and by historic I don't necessarily

2025-11-29

Lei reminds me that I missed a trick back in October, but I never set out to make this site about me, so it's just what comes naturally.

I am today very happy to feature Lei's five year anniversary video, she has made a huge contribution to the social media scene with her authentic in-depth analyses and independent self-directed investigations on all topics Chinese.

Watch and celebrate with Lei - and her unseen team, who provide her with the necessary unstinting support. Let us hope that they are a model for how our future world will be created.

(27 minutes)

Like / Dislike

2025-11-29

(11 minutes)

2025-11-28

It is now common knowledge, or at least knowledge in the public domain, that the police forces nationally were ordered not to investigate allegations and evidence of unlawful activity in connection with the 2020/21 and later Covid vaccination drives.

They are alleged to have behaved as an arm of government rather than as impartial enforcers of the law.

Ian Clayton (Ethical Approach UK) and Mark Sexton (retired police constable) have been investigating how this came about.

They now

2025-11-28

Will the AI world end in Utopia or Nightmare?

Will the AI rule us, or "enhance" us as the WEF would have it, so that we will work for them, own nothing, and be "happy" (define "happy")?

Or will we somehow wriggle out from under and make use of an AI that is our faithful servant?

Or that appears to us to be our faithful servant, much as Parliament has contrived (but ultimately failed) to appear to us? I would place quite a large bet on the AI making a vastly better fist of appearing to us as our servant whilst manipulating us into complying with what it wants us to do, than Parliament.

Perhaps the ultimate AI would be called "Jeeves", would know us (and our relatives friends and acquaintances) better than we know ourselves, and would always know how to politely and resourcefully get us out of the scrapes that we get ourselves

2025-11-27

Well, it looks as though the WHO may be right about the next pandemic, at any rate if you believe the latest attempt to scare us witless that our children will shortly be dying in numbers due to... well I never, a pandemic!

Happily "our government" is on the ball already, and has been running "Project Pegasus" planning exercise to sort out our preparedness, just in case there might be another pandemic.

"Exercise Pegasus was designated a “Tier 1” national emergency exercise, meaning it involved ministerial participation, all devolved nations and activation of COBRA, the Cabinet Office Briefing Room"

It's unclear as yet whether the familiar trusted names (Prof Ferguson, Boris Johnson, Matt Hancock, Patrick Vallance et al) would be available this time around, but I do hope so! If these

2025-11-27

Once more Alex Krainer shares his view of the on-going negotiations posturings over Ukraine, and whither the Donald's new "peace plan" (same as the old "peace plan") is likely to lead.

Venezuela also features... along with the same playbook that kicked off WW1...

As always, he is worth listening to -- except for the mention of the Hallett Inquiry, of which our readers are already aware, although there may be more to this than meets the eye...

(90 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video

2025-11-26

Happily this mRNA product was never released to the public as the clinical trial failed on its own terms. The trial results are however alarming.

"In a statement on Halloween 2023, the company promised to release the results by the end of 2023¹. It did not.

Instead, in May 2025, long after its self-imposed deadline, Pfizer quietly updated the 'study results' page for the trial on the clinicaltrials.gov Website with trial’s results."

Alex Berenson

2025-11-26

First up, a plea from Mark Attwood to those NHS and other medical staff who now realise that maybe, just maybe, inoculating the public at large with novel medical technology that

• had been developed "at warp speed" within months whilst earlier vaccines had required years of testing,
• had not been approved for general use except under an Emergency Use Authorisation,
• to allegedly defend against the "emergency" of a deadly "pandemic" that had no statistically significant effect upon the normally expected rate of "deaths from all causes", 
• which overwhelmingly "killed" people with comorbidities at around their expected lifespan, and  had no measurable effect on children who were nevertheless inoculated anyway,
• which was administered without any pretence at "informed consent", and indeed for some people under

2025-11-26

... cooler temperatures. If it keeps going like this the sea ice will soon be threatening UK shores in winter. Well it's true that "soon" is a term relative to the period under consideration, so maybe in a million years or so.

CDN has the news, grab it whilst it's hot!

2025-11-26

The NHS is showing its "progressive" tendencies.

Despite the many good people still trying to make this unstable top-heavy unaccountable progressivistic leviathan work for our benefit, its leadership is myopic, management is treated as a specialism in its own right and thus populated by expert managers, and the stench of rank stupidity has become intolerable.

Other than that the NHS is wonderful of course and we wouldn't have it any other way...

2025-11-26

The administrative government, seemingly oblivious to the constitutional need for our citizens to be judged by a "jury of our peers", now proposes, in order to cut the administrative backlog now denying justice to criminals and victims alike, to abolish the right to a jury for "non-serious" offences.

Magna Carta? What's that? How old-fashioned! We need to be modern, and grasp the benefits that modernity offers! Who would not want justice delivered promptly and without fear? Ancient and outdated tradition must not be permitted to stand in the way of progress!

This is how the ignorant and the mendacious want to convince us to abandon what remains of our Constitution so that they may better rule the people by decree. No matter that it is the people themselves who were sovereign, have always been sovereign, still are sovereign, and will always be sovereign unless and until they give up their sovereignty for the

2025-11-25

This is dangerous territory, so before plunging in, if you have not already, please read Down the Rabbit Hole 1 wherein I attempt to justify taking a critical look at topics which many will find controversial.

Here someone else takes a look at early Christianity (upon which topic the brainwashing has had at least two millennia to get going). He's obviously done a lot more work on this than I have, so I'm very happy to concede the leadership on this one.

But first, to get ourselves into the mood...

Do we believe that the Bible as we know it today is the uncorrupted Word of God?

Do we think we know the origins of the Church of England?

Or the foundation of Christianity in Rome after the

2025-11-25

The command economy doesn't seem to be faring too well...

(11 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

As if that isn't bad enough, there seems to be an Epstein connection...

2025-11-25

Yes, Martin Geddes has been up to his illuminations of matters legal and lawful, in terms that I would wager most of us could comprehend.

If we were asked to attend court and found ourselves "had up" before the head teacher in the local secondary school, we might begin to question the genuineness not only of the proceedings but also of those conducting the proceedings.

"When is a 'Court' not a Court?" would be a relevant question, and the Head Teacher should have some explaining to do.

Still, if instead we had attended in a building labelled as a "Court" and been confronted by somebody professing to be a magistrate, would anybody dare to question the legitimacy of the situation? Yet the overwhelming likelihood of just accepting the given as legitimate surely is an open invitation for fraudsters to take advantage? Even unwitting fraudsters who themselves had not validated their higher authority?

2025-11-24

I seems that the White Hats are circling their prey, and the Black hats are circling their wagons to try to stave off the inevitable.

Israel and Ukraine are key - one is apparently intent on genociding Gaza, and the other is intent on genocide in the Ukraine at the hands of the Russians. Meanwhile the Zelensky leadership seems close to being fingered in an alleged corruption scandal involving the disposition of the "support" that has been flowing into the country from the EU and elsewhere.

There is more of course, but it's behind the paywall for this week.

(Modest subscription required for full access)

2025-11-24

And deservedly so.

No, it was not an "in depth" inquiry, which would have asked the deep questions such as "Why were Prof Ferguson's Covid expected deaths modelling so vastly inflated"? 

Was the supposition that the PCR tests worked infallibly true - to what extent was it not true? All tests produce "false positives" and "false negatives" - was this novel test for a novel virus actually accurate - or was the testing of the (largely asymptomatic) general population actually a good exercise to determine the real rate of "false positives"?

If a mere IT retiree such as myself could think to ask such simple but revealing questions, what does that say about the good Baroness

2025-11-23

Barbara Boyd spells out some of the implications of our pre-Christmas situations, especially (comme d'habitude) with respect to the much-vaunted (but never defined!) "Special Relationship" between the UK and America - a relationship that Trump (against all presidential precedents?) appears to be on track to now dominate.

(14 minutes)

2025-11-23

Interest of Justice found out in Costa Rica.

They have the win, they now have to sue enough national governments to start a global ball of Nuremberg trials rolling...

... and that costs dosh.

It sounds a lot, but there's a lot of us, so per capita it won't break the bank.

That's the theory anyway, and so far it's been proven correct.

It's doable, and it's down to us.

And they have the win to prove it.

2025-11-23

Peace in the Ukraine?

Sebastian pulls the strings together to sort out the situation - which is (and has been for some time now) that Russia will settle only on terms which respect its oft-stated red lines.

Since the EU-UK is adamantly opposed to this but doesn't have the military capacity to stop the Russian army, they will need to cover any agreement in so much verbiage that they can convince themselves that they have won...

Will it work?

(15 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video

2025-11-22

The UN's Climate Control Event COP30 did not go according to plan.

After all, nothing destroys an illusion like reality, and the reality is that none of the much-foretold climate-warming catastrophes deigned to come true, even as the worst effects of the push for Agenda 2030 become glaringly apparent.

So was it all for nothing?

I don't think so.

It has had / will have the singular effect of destroying the trust that uncritical people have reflexively placed in the UN's authority.

Watch what happens now to the WHO, the WHO-WEF partnership, the UN aid programmes and much else besides.

As a fish rots from the head,