2025-08-16

Essential Safeguard or Ancient Relic?

Or both?

Our justice system is doubtless said to be "safe and effective" by the authorities - but like other government-offered products so described, perhaps we should ask: safe for whom and effective for what?

Neil Oliver notes how this safeguard has been steadily eroded over the years to the point where it is now no longer in many instances available - it has allegedly become too costly, to time-consuming, too much of a burden for our judiciary to cope with.

But what exactly is the point of our judiciary?

(14 minutes)

Like /

2025-08-15

Two contrasting takes on the world today:

1) Sebastian Sas reports on the likelihood of progress. We'll find out soon...

(21 minutes)

Like/ Dislike this video here.

2) Penny Kelly reviews the possibilities:

(49 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video

2025-08-14

Courtenay's Substack suggests that Epstein, far from operating as a mere entrapment service to ensnare the rich famous and powerful to the service of some supposed secret society, was actually actively involved in shaping the trans-humanist future for the survivors of our current times.

If Game A was the top-down model where Peak AI controls a hierarchical pyramid (albeit a much flatter pyramid than hitherto envisaged) built upon the controlled slaves within the city slave-quarters, then maybe to challenge that concept we need a Game B built upon a bottom-up control model where the power resides in slaves and is collected and consolidate into the global decision-making by the AI.

Or something like that - I haven't had the chance to study the detail, but you can read it for yourself if you are so minded.

I have to say that it's a quite

2025-08-14

Yes, more from Martin Geddes, who (rightly) suspects that we could all do with a (relatively) simple primer to help us navigate our "mismanaged" justice system.

"I’ve boiled that work down into a shorter, reusable list for anyone else facing the same fraud and injustice"

Good luck!

2025-08-14

Martin Geddes reports on a case brought by Northumbrian Water for non-payment of a water bill.

This case may go some way to illustrate the difference between the law of the sea, the law of the land, and the law of nature.

Many are familiar with the concept of the "legal fiction" based upon the birth certificate, but do not appreciate where the differentiation can be drawn. After all, it's meant to be obscure!

This case however shows one avenue by which the line can be drawn - the living man (or woman in this case) is not liable for the debts of the legal fiction unless he/she has consented to be so liable, for example by signing a form addressed to the legal fiction (or to the living man or woman him/herself?).

Whilst a positive sign and much appreciated, I wouldn't bet on utility companies

2025-08-14

Would Trump really accept The Peace Prize from the very committee that awarded the same to President Obama?!

Whether Promethean Action are right to blame the British for everything is (given Boris Johnson's blocking of a peace deal between Zelensky and Russia at the first negotiations with Mr Putin) certainly a reasonable viewpoint - reinforced recently by the reportedcapture of two British Army Colonels by a Russian army raiding party.

(14 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video

2025-08-14

Yuri Bezmenov revisited.

"Mr. Griffin dedicated his life to warning Americans of the covert conspiracy to destroy the United States from the inside out. Ironically, the year was 1984 when Mr. Griffin landed a rare interview with KGB defector, and propaganda expert, Yuri Bezmenov"

In 1984 the villain was the Soviet Union.

In 2025 the villain is... the CIA (not to mention the Five Eyes).

Maybe the inversion of reality is just about complete - it's just that we haven't fully recognised it ... yet.

(5 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video

2025-08-13

Hot news of the day is the Trump federalization of Washington DC.

WDC is/was not a State of the Union, it was a law unto itself (along with the City of London and the Vatican).

The Federal Reserve (not a reserve and not federal, but a privately owned banking cartel that ruled over the Federal Reserve Note (AKA the Dollar) much as the Bank of England (also a privately owned Bank) administers monetary matters in (but not necessarily for) the UK.

The observant will have noticed that Trump has been showing active interest in the management of the Federal Reserve recently, and one may reasonably speculate that the Fed's days as an independent banking cartel are about as numbered as the independence of Washington DC (AKA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA INC).

The legal and monetary implications are by

2025-08-13

"If it looks like a mafia extortion racket, and smells like a mafia extortion racket, maybe it is a mafia extortion racket?"

"... we are watching a hollowed-out state being dismantled in slow motion"

"Our job as civilians isn’t to 'beat the system.' It’s to gather testimony showing why it was too corrupt to salvage"

Martin Geddes continues to gather his testimony.

2025-08-13

Kate Shemirani is controversial. 

"I realised that everything I had been taught was rubbish... everything that they tell you... you need to do is an inversion of what you really need to do... "

"... It's a total abuse of power... "

"... we have uncovered... something that is so sinister, so horrific, that Covid just pales in comparison... in 2020... everyone became an organ donor... unless you opt out .. so we now have 13 yr olds then, who are 20 now, that don't know that you have to opt out... Great Britain is going to be the biggest organ-donors in the world... supplying organs to the entire commonwealth... "

It's your view that counts.

(2 hrs 9 mins)

Like / Dislike this video here.

Zero hedge reports on Ukrainian Public Opinion.

2025-08-13

Madame Lei brings us up to date with how the various factions are shaping up.

(51 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2025-08-12

... or, some might think, to end us all.

I couldn't possibly comment.

2025-08-12

Love him or loathe him or simply can't make head nor tail of him, we can perhaps all agree that Trump is taking us where no president has previously dared - and nobody knows where we will end up.

And he's doing it in a style that no previous president dared to present.

The ever reliable Nick Hubble writing for Investor's Daily makes the case.

But will Trump get away with it where Liz Truss could not, and if so, why?

The short answer may simply be that Trump now has the Fed where he wants them - with his nominee joining the Board and in place ready to take over the Fed whenever occasion arises. Liz Truss never had such leverage over the Bank of England...

2025-08-12

(31 minutes)

Vigilant Fox reports.

2025-08-12

Played out over centuries, the Great Game approaches another leg of its nefarious geopolitical contortions.

But is this just another planned twist of the eternal manipulations, or is it approaching a climax of some sort that will kill or mortally wound the beast, once and for all? 

Alex Krainer explains the intricacies of this contrived power-play for the world, ancient and now modern.

Oh for St George, who might kill the beast with a simple thrust of his lance!

(38 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video

2025-08-12

Make of this what you will.

(15 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2025-08-11

A glimpse of the future, or a load of... ?

Dick Allgire spills the beans on the predicted monetary future.

But bear in mind that predictions are inherently tricky, especially about the future...

(67 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2025-08-11

"The age of title, costume, and jurisdictional deceit is over. Now begins the age of clean signal"

We are defined by what we do, not by what we hope for.

"The final lie is that we are powerless until the regime admits defeat. But the truth is — we are already free"

Martin Geddes draws the necessary conclusions.

2025-08-11

The erratic behaviour of certain world leaders gives rise to a number of possibilities...

1. They are beholden to a number of skilful advisors, whose policies they profess depending on who last had their ear
2. They are played by a number of clones / substitute actors who are beholden to different controllers through blackmail and/or bribery
3. They are robotic AI simulationsserving various AI master programs that are in constant IT conflict to achieve and maintain control of the mouthpiece

There may be other possibilities, but these three suffice to demonstrate the point.

Outlandish you say?

But nothing is off the table. Except perhaps peace in our  time. Or actual prosecutions of the guilty