Green/Climate

2025-09-09

No, really. Liz Truss proved that it can happen to any party that's in office but not in power.

And that observation really sums up the state of play in politics all around the world - nothing is as it seems.

It is however illustrative of the folly of central banking. Not enough money from taxes for the government? So borrow more fake money (newly invented with a few keystrokes) from the Central Bank and repay the loan with interest (from genuine money from the product of the taxes on your labours). Central bankers like this because they make a killing.

Still in trouble? So borrow more fake money (newly invented with a few keystrokes) from a Global Bank like the IMF and repay the loan with interest (from genuine money from the product of your labours, via our obliging government's taxes). Global bankers like it because they make a

2025-09-07

Yes, Tony Blair gets a mention, and of course "Human Rights". In fact, name any prominent left-wing politician of today or yesteryear and he's likely to be connected to the Fabian Society.

If you're on the "Left" but not a Fabian today, then maybe you need to take stock... as you may be a revolutionary Marxist (Fabians like their march to power to be slow and incremental, Marxists like it fast and furious). 

"They are not the best lawyers... "

"It's... a cult that offers the not-very-able an easy access to public life... "

I'm somehow not convinced that this video is going to come out in their favour, but if the above observation is correct, it could go some way to explain the inadequate quality of left-wing MPs, of which the current parliament has a serious over-abundance. That's not to imply of

2025-09-04

Andrew Bridgen, who was perhaps our only conscientious MP in the last Parliament, comments on his experiences in Parliament and outside.

"Every Institution that's there to protect the public interest has failed"

"We don't need reform, we need a radical change in the way that we are governed... we are going to have to have a reckoning for all of this... there'll have to be some very severe punishments given out... that's the only way the public is going to trust any of these institutions again... "

Quite so.

(21 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video

2025-09-03

No, "Zero Net Zero" isn't the latest thriller documenting some daring SAS adventure, it's the ongoing yawn-a-thon regarding the quest for Net Zero, doomed to play interminably until the UK government finally collapses of its own staggeringly complacent idiocy, or gets taken down by a very cold and exceedingly angry populace.

Net Zero isn't coming any time soon - not whilst we have electricity in the grid anyway.

That's the only conclusion that seems rational, given that Ned Sillyband won't come clean on how and when, but it doesn't rule out that the whole mess will collapse and there won't be any electricity for the likes of you and me to be had from the grid. Not given the governments obsession with setting up innumerable shiny new but power-hungry AI Data Centres. 

Although I don't doubt that even then, we will still be burning fossil fuel somewhere, maybe everywhere that diesel

The Most Anti-Human Document You Could Possibly Imagine

2025-08-29

We don't feature much about the state of schools in our country, because it's a long time since I was at school, and no doubt the changes since then have been enormous.

A few years ago David Adelman asserted that schools today are no place for children - but the catch is that nobody has time for home-schooling these days (even if they knew how to do it) so parents send their kids off to the State's tender care.

We did that ourselves.

There they get the State's one-size-fits-all education by artificial intelligence - in other words, there is a rule for everything and the rules must be followed. Regardless of whether the kid actually needs a bit of TLC or a clip around the ear (only joking!) he/she/it/them/they/<insert

2025-08-25

Old hand Bill seen-it-all-before Bonner writing for Investor's Daily discusses the Trump tariffs phenomenon and whether it will succeed in making stuff in America once more.

Now it is true that the West's manufacturing industry has been exported to the Far East (primarily China) ever since the 1980s. Perhaps partly to make ourselves look greener (at the cost of China et al becoming blacker - did that save the world?) and partly to turbo-charge the financialisation of the Western economies, inventing ever more ways for the super-rich to become mega-rich by manipulating the markets and buying up everything on the cheap as the smaller players are forced (by taxation and central bankers as necessary) into bankruptcy. 

Now "the Donald" has the impossible task of undoing the damage of the last 50ish years by rebalancing the US economy so that they make stuff again, and given the electoral cycle, doing it in short order. So he is pushing his tariffs on imports to the US (and causing major disruptions to the

2025-08-25

We have been subsidising "Green" for so many years now that it's obvious that... <insert your conclusion here>.

Well, there's lies, damned lies, and statistics, so make of this what you will.

2025-08-20

Dr Steven Koonin speaks to Dr John Robson on all matters Climate and Weather.

Make of this what you will...

(57 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2025-08-18

Perhaps there are just too many Finks around, or maybe my fingers were inexplicably guided by the Fates (who most definitely have a serious sense of humour - were such to be at all possible) to pull up the wrong Fink whilst searching for the new joint interim co-chairs of that August body, the World Economic Forum.

Mind you, the difference between the wrong Fink and the right Fink may not be as great as one may inadvertently suppose, as both seem to be inexorably entrapped within the all-enmeshing all-deluding all-climate-modelling fabrications of the Great Global Sustainability Scam, which is (finally!) looking increasingly unsustainable, as all its alarming projections over the last 50 years have come to - wait for it - nought, null points, diddly-squat.

A bit like Prof Ferguson's

2025-08-17

Perhaps it always has been, we just didn't notice it when Central Override didn't particularly affect us.

We do now. We will in spades when they have driven our farmers off the land in favour of who knows which corporate behemoths - we cannot eat AI, whether carbon-neutral or not.

Would we rather have food locally grown, or solar farms on repurposed farmland that require us to import our food from wherever it might be available? Will that emit more or less CO₂ than emitted by shipping our food from around the world? 

There are no answers forthcoming because the question itself is irrelevant. There is still no science that supports the "CO₂ drives global warming" proposition, and every global crisis that has been projected over the last 50 years (Arctic ice gone, polar bears gone, New York seaboard under water, etc) has failed to

2025-08-12

(31 minutes)

Vigilant Fox reports.

2025-07-27

Now that America is becoming ever less obedient to the globalists' control mechanisms (amid the growing likelihood that the Epstein media may be about to be released), the EU is becoming the favoured centre for consolidating their empire.

Just one problem - many EU nations are showing a problematic tendency to elect all the "wrong" politicians. Even worse, the "far right" labelling seems to be losing its power to ostracise them!

"Von der Leyen’s Green New Deal is above all a deal for lobbyists who want to greenwash the dirtiest business, war... "

Could there be a more blatant inversion of the truth?

"By their inversions shall you know them" may yet rank alongside "by their fruits shall you know them".

2025-07-26

Regimes never go tidily, even in the best organised democracy, but whatever political views we hold, there can be few who still believe that our current "democracy" is well organised.

"There is nothing particularly controversial about me saying this. It is rapidly turning into the consensus view"

However, those who still suggest that all we have to do is to vote in a new political party - perhaps Reform - are likely still trundling along well behind the curve of unfolding reality.

It isn't just the wrong party in power, it's the wrong system altogether. Yes it's not only the political parties who effectively conspire to subject us to the World Economic Forum (in strategic partnership with the UN), but it's also the Civil Service Blob, the Judiciary, the CPS and the Police, the Monarchy, the Military,

2025-07-16

Climate in Crisis?

We have posted so much on this nonsense that it seems unnecessary to post more, but Fall of the Cabal heroine Cyntha Koete has done such a good job with "Part 28 Climate Crisis?" that it would be churlish not to acknowledge her work.

There's sure to be somebody "out there" who needs to see it!

But do you really need a "scientist" (define "scientist"!) to tell you what's true and what's not? You only have to look at the long litany of failed warming events that were forecastover the last 50 years (but somehow never manifested) to know that it's all bunk.

Hideously expensive bunk, but bunk none the less.

2025-07-11

I suppose that the best candidate for "****" is "unproven".

In which case we are seriously abusing our children by indoctrinating them in unproven but terrifying climate dogma in our schools.

Lots of climate models (funded by all the usual suspects) do not add up to a body of science. Even if some are right, they are not proof of anything other than man's ability to delude itself by admiring it's own efforts.

Complex they may be and undoubtedly are, but a mastery of complexity does not of itself indicate "science", just as assertions by politicians do not necessarily indicate reliability of outcome. Professor Ferguson's Covid models should have dispelled that myth back in 2020.

Look up the

2025-07-10

Our National Health Service (or "National treasure" for those who have been asleep for the last 77 years) is the pride and joy of government in this country - medical treatment free at the point of use for all who need it!

What's not to like?

Well, where should I begin?

It's paid for by taxing us. And as the benefit is assumed to be so enormous, taxes to support it are correspondingly enormous. And being taxes, we don't get to choose whether we want to pay.

And being the offspring of Big Government and Big Pharma, whilst the costs are socialised the profits are privatised.

It's not as if we can choose our preferred path back to health - only drugs (ie: poisons) offered by Big Pharma can be approved for sale on the NHS, if you want anything else it's verboten. The magic word here is "protocol". Doctors are no longer educated in healthy living and natural medicine,

2025-07-08

Eugippius reminds us that one of primary benefits of the EU is that the unelected Commission gets to impose its will on member states.

And one of its wills is the energy transition, which will on no account be delayed.

And if that means the lights going out, then so be it. After all, minor inconveniences such as darkness and cold are obviously acceptable in order to "save the planet".

It's tempting to have a misguided chuckle at their expense, since we voted ourselves out of the EU almost 20 years ago. However, it turns out that we have the equivalent of the EU Commission in our own UK Parliament, now "independent" and, in likely denial of the electorate's wishes (they didn't ask us), hell-bent on supporting Ed Millibrain's dash for our very own legally mandated Net Zero by 2030.

(BTW: it being legally mandated, will our Ed be the one sent to prison when the much heralded and dubiously promised Net Zero

2025-06-27

The following glad tidings will no doubt herald a Great Leap Forward, an incoming cornucopia of UK manufacturing abundance, bolstering the Treasury private sector, led by the incredibly wise initiatives of the government in creating new markets (particularly in modern green energy initiatives, and modern munitions and supplies for our newly-to-be-modernised but hitherto underfunded military) and encouraging new initiatives (such as AI) that will enable this abundance to be produced at little cost in terms of labour and training requirements.

The pertinent verbiage, extruded onto the Gov UK website, will be widely welcomed by all true patriots.

Whilst it may take a few years for these initiatives to create enough abundance to actually trickle down to the population at

2025-06-19

Eugippius is a German commentator, but all of Europe including the UK suffers from the same stultifying political blight, all caused by certain topics being off-limits for discussion.

We all know what they are because if our political classes continue to pursue them in the same way as now, we will all be in the dustbin of civilisation when the lights go out - and trying to claw our way out of that bin will be between impossible and impracticable, because those who lead us are burning the bridges back to sanity, ie: the power-stations that can be proven to power the grid effectively are being shuttered.

No amount of wishful thinking will ever enable the intermittent renewables to reliably do the job. Nuclear is a good power source that can power a grid - but then renewables would be unnecessary! Nuclear as a back-up for intermittent renewables simply turns the economics on its head, since we would be paying the whole cost of nuclear for marginal benefit.

Page 2 of 24