Green/Climate

2024-09-16

After all, government can simply up the tax rates and freeze the thresholds (not to mention the pensioners - so I won't. After all, with the new assisted dying rules coming down the track, they will likely take care of themselves, if they can get an NHS appointment. And if they can't, the government can fast-track them).

So when will public realisation explode into action?

Nick Hubble has a theory.

2024-09-06

Well, some think that the much-hyped "renewables" will never be clean enough - and it's not just the natural environment that will suffer either, but also a problem of potentially "pandemic" proportions... well, I'll let Nick Hubble explain:

(15 minutes) (this is not financial advice!)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2024-09-04

Another blast of reality to disperse the miasma of fear uncertainty and doubt about Climate Change, from the ever evidence-based John Robson.

Full report here.

(21 minutes) 

Like / Dislike this video here.

2024-08-31

May the Lord be praised, the government is reported to be asking National Grid for advice on how they can support the Net Zero religious cult's objectives.

With not long to go before the 2030 deadline, will they ensure that the "Fourth Turning" becomes an extinction event, or will they listen to the advice proffered and adjust Net Zero expectations accordingly? (No prizes for guessing the correct answer) 

Go on, you know you want to!

(NB: this is not a party political article taking aim at the current governing party. We regard all the parties as equivalently compromised in their support for "Net

2024-08-31

"Green" hydrogen? Hydrogen is hydrogen isn't it? "Green" simply indicates the method of production, usually by electrolysis, the splitting of water into its constituents hydrogen and oxygen.

So wind farms can be used to generate electricity when the wind blows (but not too hard!) and the power can be stored as hydrogen gas. Sounds pretty simple really, so where is all this additional CO₂ supposed to come from?

Well, perhaps it's not actually CO₂ that's the problem here...

And lest we forget, even if we in the UK do miraculously achieve "Net Zero" (whatever that is and by whatever astronomical cost in economic and human survival terms it might be achieved) by 2050, it won't make a measurable difference to global temperatures even on the IPCC's highly dubious

2024-08-29

"Biomass" (or "wood" to you and me) Is essentially the product of chopping down trees, and drying and pulping and pelleting them (using energy in the process).

The resulting nuggets / pellets / however you want to describe them are then shipped across oceans (using more energy) and burned in power stations such as Drax in Yorkshire (creating as much CO₂ as from fossil fuel).

How is this more sustainable than just burning coal (or better yet gas or oil since these can be transported by pipeline whereas coal needs to be shipped like wood pellets)?

We might as well have created the same amount of CO₂ from burning fossil fuels and left the trees alone to remove it, saving everybody much expense! 

And are we really replanting and regrowing the "biomass" sufficiently fast to replace the "biomass" that we are burning away? Is anybody checking, or are the loggers just coining it? And if

2024-08-20

Jacob in Q&A mode reviews the history of the global elite's scheme to rule the world.

A useful and accessible discourse that shows how their obsession with world control has been advanced at the highest levels in the most boring way possible, probably in order to evade the scrutiny of the rest of humanity. Well, that's my interpretation anyway.

There can't be too many people by now who haven't heard of the Rockefellers, the Club of Rome, the Trilateral Commission, the Atlantic Council, the Committee of 300, the Bilderberg Group, the World Economic Forum etc etc...  the list is intentionally extensive and irrelevantly but portentously named in order to discourage casual investigation.

Nevertheless there exist heroic sleuths who have penetrated the turgid prose of their never-ending reports to unearth their true agenda, now with us in the form of the equally uninformatively-named UN Agendas 2050 / 2030.

2024-08-09

Or tales of a small farmer?

Dr David Bell reviews the state of farming in the UK (and elsewhere) for the Daily Sceptic.

We get few articles about farming anywhere these days, so a good one like this is very welcome. Still, farming being very varied by nature, we need more if the public is to get a better understanding of the primary occupation on which we all rely.

No farms, no food.

2024-08-09

But maybe only if enough of us can stay awake through all the turgid hyper-prose that our would-be global rulers have been extruding in ever-increasing ever-confusing and ever-brain-stifling quantities through their self-multiplying self-appointed authority-imitating plethora of brainwashing agencies committees action-groupings climate panels and catastrophe-planning events.

Should we be worried?

Jacob Nordangård reports in like vein (if you fancy a "power nap"):

(35 minutes but seems like 2 hours)

Like /

2024-07-21

The Daily Sceptic reports that due to an excess of CO₂, previously arid areas of the planet may be lost to vegetation.

So in addition to all the other perils of CO₂, we must now consider the shrinkage of arid areas of our landscape due to the unwanted encroachment of green vegetation.

Clearly there is no time to be lost - these deserts must be covered in solar farms immediately in order to prevent further loss of habitat for desert-dwelling fauna and stop further combustion of carbon-based fuels.

Read about the new Global Greening Peril.

2024-07-16

The "Green New Deal" doesn't exist. Even after 50 years of righteous and determined green zealotry in pursuit of the decarbonisation agenda, the world is still burning more fossil fuel every year! 

It's all hype and obfuscation for the "benefit" of the corporate giants that are creaming off the ever-rising subsidies necessary to make the GND look as though it's doing something other than ruining us all.

Will the new Labour Government be any better at camouflaging this pig in a poke than the Tories? I'd say that the omens are not auspicious - because although reality does have the disturbing bad habit of impinging on us eventually (no matter how much nonsense is spewed forth in Parliament), humanity's determination to cherry-pick its figures to suit the narrative - rather than to assess the whole problem in the round - is why we still obsess over installing an inconsequentially small number of windmills in the UK whilst ignoring the many new coal and gas plants being constructed by other much larger

2024-07-16

Whitney Webb runs through the Davos plan for their take-over of the world - including us.

Everything and everyone will be tokenised, traded, and finally r*ped and pillaged,  including mother earth herself, for the benefit of the global elite for whom these systems are set up. Universal ids, CBDCs, and ESG monitoring systems will run the world by  permitting or denying purchases at point of sale.

All will be tracked, monitored, and controlled through AI algorithms that will be "all-knowing and infallible" (even, and especially, when they are not - for how could a remote AI somewhere in the bowels of the web be challenged? Such systems don't have to work as advertised - they just have to be in control!).

(15 minutes)

 

Like / Dislike this video here.

2024-07-02

Well, it may be on the other side of the Atlantic but a precedent is a precedent.

If they are doing it in the States then they are doing it here, as we can all see should we be inclined to lift up our eyes and look at what is going on above our heads.

Now it is true that making something illegal doesn't necessarily mean that enforcing that ban will be easy, or even possible (as our own government may in due course find out when its legally mandated "Net Zero" targets come due but unfulfilled), but it is the first step.

Interest of Justice has the story.

2024-06-30

We have approached this topic before, in a memorable interview (below) by Del Bigtree with Zach Bush back in 2020 which covered a variety of current-day ills.

"That this is the exact opposite of what the U.N./W.E.F. want –  which is to force people into fifteen minute prison cities with rural areas left to carbon sinks – is just another example of reality flowing like water around fascist-erected obstacles"

This is how the world should be developing:

"if only 11 percent of current farmland were turned to restoration, all of the supposed excess carbon emissions of man

2024-06-30

"Those contracts must be interesting, not that anyone can see them. The first thing they do is act as whacking big first-time tax deductions. The second thing they do is act as an annual tax deduction because those trees are eating CO2. Very clever. International interests buy our land (and yours) and use it to not pay taxes. While banking some of the most valuable assets on the planet"

This is what happens when big government cosy up to big corporations to rig the cash flows.

"imagine these people embedded in every single industry. Because they are"

"All that activist does is strategize on how to destroy that business. And they are paid, through environmental organizations funded by BlackRock"

Climate Change is Big Business, but it's rigged business, not free

2024-06-25

For a deep dive into the history of Climate Research and the latest thinking (if it can be so categorised) , look no further than the very first video interview from Climate Discussion Nexus, with Dr John Robson in conversation with Roger Pielke Jr.

(2 hrs)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2024-06-25

Richard interviews campaigning farmer Peter Lawrence, who is not happy with the climate meddling / geoengineering activities that are going on in the southwestern extremities of the British Isles. High prices and food shortages incoming?

(59 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2024-06-23

Why is it that politicians always seem to suffer from a reality gap?

In so far as the gap between the fantasy of their fondly-imagined future and the current reality of the state of the nation always seems to be a chasm too far for them to even comprehend, let alone to bridge?

It's as if they really believe that all they have to do is to tell us where they want us to be in the future, and someone else will do all the hard graft to work out how to get us all there, and then actually get us all there, whatever obstacles may be encountered along the way.

Perhaps we voters should send engineers to Parliament rather than politicians, since engineers are accustomed to producing products that work - but then wouldn't that mean that we would have to work with the defective products now produced by all those useless displaced politicians?

"It is no longer possible for either party to pretend that we can decarbonise