The Unelected

2022-05-26

Toby Young (General Secretary of the Free Speech Union) takes a critical view of the On-Line Safety Bill in this Daily Sceptic report.

" ... it’s a gold-embossed invitation to woke activists to censor the speech of their political opponents in the name of protecting vulnerable people from ‘harm’. Why a Conservative Government with an 80-seat majority is handing this weapon to its enemies is a mystery"

No mystery Toby - the Tory leadership themselves have been swallowed by the blob and are now  an inseparable part of it.

"What does the Government mean by ‘harmful’? The only definition the Bill offers is in clause 150, where it sets out the details of a new Harmful Communications Offence, punishable by up to two years in jail: ‘harm’ means psychological harm amounting to at least serious

2022-05-26

Bill has laid it all out for us - all we need to do is just read his book to receive his wisdom - fortunately it has been published just at the right time to help us deal with the very serious threat of Monkeypox. Can this threat be countered before it becomes a pandemic?

Of course all the usual suspects are queuing up to tell us how he is totally wrong and his solutions have been disproven, most recently by the response to the Covid pandemic, but we should remember that this isn't just Gates speaking, he has a great wealth of authoritative people behind him (the WEF, the UN, the WHO, plus sundry similar bodies that characteristically don't make the headlines, such as the Trilateral Commission, the Club of Rome etc, plus many distinguished academics such as Professor Neil Ferguson, and the full weight of the pharmaceutical industry), so we should pay close attention.

For an untimely review of this book by some who do seem always to be at the forefront of those usual suspects,

2022-05-25

I've reflected only recently on my student days, but now I find myself posting another article that evokes another memory from those times.

What is academia for? Does it fulfil the function?

Uni was always sold as a place to go between finishing school and starting a career, a place where the clever and inquisitive should go to question the established knowledge, to push their understanding beyond the current boundaries, and to have fun doing it.

Potentially difficult terrain though, especially when the answers to your questions on the established knowledge turn out to be inadequate. That would mean that a certain amount of established knowledge must be demolished before one's understanding could be pushed beyond the (revised!) boundaries, within an establishment notoriously averse

2022-05-24

I found this clip stirred memories for me, as in 1968 I had already been trained as a new-fangled "computer programmer" and I was about to start a sandwich course at a polytechnic for a BSc in "Computer Science and Data Processing" (which turned out to be more like Maths and Stats with some computing thrown in as an afterthought).

Looking back to those days I would have rejected out of hand the idea that a computer could control anybody, even in the relatively elementary manner posited - they were nowhere near sufficiently sophisticated, there was no internet, and although radio comms as a technology was clearly feasible it certainly lacked the coverage (unless the controlled person would be held in confinement).

We could just about run a payroll for a large corporation after months / years of development and testing, on machines that read their data off punched cards and then stored it on magnetic tapes - no ubiquitous discs for us at that time. Happy days!

75th World Health Assembly - Geneva

2022-05-19

The truth has been in short supply in recent years, perhaps especially in the scientific journals, so it's with some surprise that I note the publication of this highly critical editorial by Russell L. Blaylock (retired neurosurgeon) in a prestigious journal, Surgery Neurology International.

It's a wide-ranging and thorough review of all the horrors that the "pandemic" was used to unleash on us.

Some relevant points below but these are a long way from illustrating the full breadth and depth of the article, which pulls no punches.

"Cancer patients are being told they should get vaccinated with these deadly vaccines. This, in my opinion, is insane"

"It should be noted that no studies were ever done on several critical aspects of this type of vaccine"

"Previous experience with the flu vaccines clearly demonstrates that the safety studies done by

2022-05-17

Many of us have watched videos of strange particulates found in the "jabs" and have heard speculations about what they may portend.

Ricardo Delgardo of La Quinta Columna (or for us Brits La Quinta Columna via Google Translate) explains the results of his investigations in this video.

"Graphene oxide is extremely toxic, and the toxicity is also dependent on the electromagnetic radiation it absorbs"

"... this graphene oxide can be stimulated remotely and wirelessly, using .. the new 4G, 4G plus and 5G technology... "

"All vaccinated people send their data to an external server controlled by artificial intelligence...

2022-05-16

... when first we practise to deceive.

This article from the AIER concerns the misuse of regulation to impose rules and laws made for a different purpose altogether to force corporations to comply with what amounts to little more than the personal preferences of the regulators (or others in positions of authority).

Nobody voted for this form of coercion, yet it seems to have become a favoured way to sidestep democratic accountability by others both within and without the USA.

For example, who can forget Mark Carney of the Bank of England forecasting that those companies that did not embrace the "climate change" narrative would be bankrupted?

The AIER draws attention to a not dissimilar situation within the USA: 

...

2022-05-16

The Federal Reserve is the bank that famously is neither federal nor a reserve.

So what to do about it, and why?

What is money for anyway?

Does it matter who controls it?

LaRouchePAC address this thorny problem:

(30 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2022-05-15

Read with emotion, and seemingly some slight intoxication, but the gist is very clear.

"... it asserts that the UNITED STATES CORPORATION was formed illegally, that it is foreign owned and that its shareholders have been quietly at war with America for over 150 years... "

(31 minutes)