2022-02-25
Crime reference number. 6029679/21
"A complaint re ‘Misconduct in public office’ and ‘Gross negligent manslaughter’ was made at Hammersmith Police station on Monday the 20th of December 2021. A separate application is also lodged at the International Criminal Court"
"On the 22nd February the UK Metropolitan Police dismissed the evidence that the legal team Philip Hyland and Lois Bayliss, alongside Mark Sexton, Dr Samuel White and the people of Britain, have been submitting under crime ref: 6029679/21
The evidence was clear and damning.
A line in the sand has been drawn. The Police are now guilty of obstructing justice"
Read the response of 25th February to this dismissal of the evidence:
Full Letter - Response by Philip Hyland of pjhlaw
"I am instructed by Doctor Sam White to request that you review your decision to take no further action in relation to the above crime reference number [CRN].
The letter is an open letter given the public interest in the issues raised as well as the need for transparency."
This is a long and detailed legal letter which covers all the points. I pick out a few of the pertinent points below to provide a flavour of the arguments presented:
"The Met has sought to frame the CRN as solely around suppression of information regarding the SARS CoV2 injection. That is not how the crimes were reported"
"Those people had felt compelled to have the SARS Cov2 injection based on an illegal fettering of the fundamental human right to decline a medical intervention. That fettering was implemented by the executive inverting the fundamental human right to informed consent by executive action, the issuing of guidance. It is established law that human rights cannot be removed by executive action"
"The evidence supplied to the Met shows that had a stringent approval process been conducted by the MHRA the fraud reported by the BMJ would have been uncovered at the approval stage rather than 9 months later. Stringent approval processes unearth fraud"
"A stringent approval process would have examined the raw RCT trial data with a fine toothed comb. The fact that Pfizer is contesting the release of the raw data suggests that there is something to hide"
"The Met appears also not to have grasped that emergency use authorisation is subject to constant vigilance post authorisation. Regulation is constant rather than fixed"
"Had stringent post authorisation vigilance been conducted by the MHRA SARS CoV2 injections would have been suspended to allow for investigation of serious adverse events, including bad batches and the presence of unauthorised and toxic materials in vials. There is no evidence that the MHRA has taken any action to suspend authorisation pending further investigation"
"Met Commissioner Dick received an open letter dated 2 July 2021 to Sir Simon Stevens alleging criminal gross negligence and illegal conflicts of interest by the government in responding to the pandemic declared by the WHO. Met Commissioner Dick took no action on that letter"
"... alleged breaches of Convention Rights place a positive obligation on the Met to investigate particularly where those breaching Convention rights are the state or agents of the state. Any failure to investigate renders the Met liable for such a failure"
"none of the witnesses or Complainants have been contacted by the Met to be interviewed"
"the Complainants have not been informed that any Police Officer has recused themselves from the investigation or evidence review owing to a conflict of interest, for example belonging to the freemasons or being a graduate of Common Purpose"
