2020/10/30
Now does seem to be the time to wonder why our supposedly democratic UK government is so hell-bent on locking everyone down, despite the now pretty clear fact that "the pandemic" blew itself out in June.
But wait - the second wave is upon us! Cases are shooting up! Deaths are rising! Not just in the UK either, all of Europe is within its grip!
At this point I call upon the ever beguiling and unflappable Ivor Cummins to straighten out the facts from the hysteria:
Like / Dislike this video here.
To confirm his point, here is the graph of excess deaths of all causes for England (PHE's Weekly national Influenza and COVID-19 surveillance report - up to wk 42):
At some point we will see rising deaths from causes for which normal NHS access was suspended in March - cancer, heart disease, diabetes ... the list goes on. These patients are slow-burn by comparison to Covid, and when they do appear finally in hospital they will be tested for Covid regularly until they get a positive result, after which under the current medical orthodoxy they become a Covid statistic. So we can prepare for inflated reports of Covid deaths, and under-reported deaths from other causes.
Is this not fraud, pure and simple, at the hands of the "medical orthodoxy"?
Who controls this medical orthodoxy?
If you need more evidence, listen to Dr Mike Yeadon, formerly of Pfizer, who tells it as he sees it to Anna Brees:
Like / Dislike this video here. If Youtube pulls it, watch on Bitchute.
So why is "our" NHS-PHE-government being disingenuous with the actualité?
Indeed, it's not just the UK that is thus afflicted, it seems to be at least all of Europe and even the whole world. So we must ask a different question - why are "they" doing this; to which question we must add a supplementary: who are "they"?
To be clear, the following is simply speculation on my part, supported by appropriate links:
World Economic Forum and UN Sign Strategic Partnership Framework (June 2019)
"The new Strategic Partnership Framework between the United Nations and the World Economic Forum has great potential to advance our efforts on key global challenges and opportunities, from climate change, health and education to gender equality, digital cooperation and financing for sustainable development. Rooted in UN norms and values, the Framework underscores the invaluable role of the private sector in this work – and points the way toward action to generate shared prosperity on a healthy planet while leaving no one behind" - António Guterres, UN Secretary-General
World Economic Forum and OECD Sign Strategic Partnership Framework (Jan 2020)
“A socially inclusive and environmentally sustainable economy that improves opportunity for all is the key to humanity’s collective future. Managing the transition to such an economy will be the critical challenge of this decade. The strategic partnership framework with the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development is designed to leverage the collective power of both of our organizations and advance this vision” - Klaus Schwab, World Economic Forum Founder and Executive Chairman
"The OECD covers themes ranging from economic development, education and skills, employment, labour and social affairs, entrepreneurship, regional and urban development, environment, financial and enterprise affairs, science, technology and innovation, statistics and data, tax policy and administration, as well as trade and agriculture. Among the World Economic Forum Platforms include Shaping the Future of New Economy and Society, Shaping the Future of Global Public Goods, Shaping the Future of Technology Governance (including Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, Blockchain and Distributed Ledger Technologies, and IoT, Robotics and Smart Cities, etc.); a full list of 18 Platforms can be found here"
(My highlights)
Those who control the global finances control the world, and world-wide Covid control is assuredly what we are now witnessing.
I see no mention of the nation state and democracy anywhere here? But they are for the "private sector" "health" "science" and "technology and innovation" not to mention "statistics and data" so maybe they have all the pandemic propaganda tools covered.
i think we may need to qualify what they mean by "private sector" - you don't get an invitation to the WEF by being a small business, you do if you are a big financial institution or a global cartel (such as the central banks, the big pharma companies or their associates). Maybe we should think in terms of crony-capitalism, the prime example in the UK being the relationship between government and big pharma, where the NHS act as the sales force and the government bungs huge amounts of taxpayers' money to big pharma for development and supply of untested vaccines of such dubious efficacy and safety that they willingly pass laws indemnifying big pharma from any possible lawsuits that claim damage caused by these vaccines.
You couldn't make it up.
So maybe it's not too big a leap of the imagination to consider a linkage between the WEF and UN and the management of the global pandemic response, particularly (as Mike Yeadon remarks) when long-established principles of epidemiology have been and continue to be relentlessly pushed aside in favour of lock-downs, masks, social distancing, and other unproven non-pharmaceutical but always destructive and anti-democratic measures.
The central banks of course could have an interest in provoking a financial collapse to cover up the long-recognised unsustainability of the existing world financial situation - to say so is merely to agree with the IMF that a reset of the world financial system (ie: debt mountain) is now required.
Where we might disagree with the IMF is in the notion that this reset should be determined by the world's banks meeting in private - should it not rather be determined by the world's nations meeting in public?
Lastly, any such reset will likely fail without the support of the USA, so from this perspective the current travails of the US presidential election may perhaps be understood. Trump is the wild card, and no effort is being spared to prevent his second term. For those with an inclination to explore this theme further, i suggest this link.
