2021-12-03
"The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released the first batch of documents related to Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine after a federal judge ordered that they must comply with a massive Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request that was filed by a government accountability group called Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency"
Gateway Pundit reports, 2nd December.
"FDA challenged the FOIA request in court. After the agency was told that it must turn over the documents, Justice Department lawyers representing the FDA asked a federal judge to allow them an unthinkable 55 years to process the request"
"in just the first 90 days of the vaccine’s roll out under the FDA’s EUA – from December 1st. 2020 – February 28th, 2021 – there were TENS OF THOUSANDS of reported adverse reactions, including OVER 1200 DEATHS"
"the report states that there were a total of 42,086 case reports of individuals who had an adverse reaction to Pfizer’s vaccine worldwide, with the largest number (13,739) coming from the United States and from the UK (13,404)"
and in case you don't consider these figures very high . . .
"The report only included adverse events to the vaccine that researchers considered 'serious cases', there were thousands more submissions that were left out of this data"
I've removed the bold type from the above - the information is shocking enough without added emphasis.
The figures relate only to the Pfizer BioNTech vaccine. They are not comparable to the VAERS or MHRA Yellow Card totals that include adverse reports from all vaccine manufacturers.
"Yet somehow the paper concludes that the 'review of available data' was good enough and demonstrated a 'favorable benefit-risk balance' for the rushed vaccine.
"What’s the benefit-risk balance on a virus that has a 99.9% recovery rate?"
I suppose it depends on the number of outcomes estimated improved by the vaccine - a number that is dependent on the accuracy of the assumptions used to estimate them. How to weigh the various types of injuries (vaccine vs disease) alongside the deaths? What's the betting that these assumptions were determined by Pfizer?
As the authors note, Pfizer are not a disinterested party - they have been raking in unimaginable amounts of money for the vaccines. Their future would be thrown into confusion if the vaccines were seen to do more harm than good.
By any reasonable understanding, our governments are complicit:
- in not ensuring independent regulation,
- in buying vaccines and only vaccines to defeat the disease disregarding all other viewpoints,
- and in buying advertising campaigns to scare the public into compliance.
