2025-07-18
The WHO has pushed ahead with its IHR Amendments and Pandemic Treaty, allegedly despite significant errors in the processes that were relied upon when introducing these measures.
So if the correct legally prescribed processes were not followed, do these measures carry legal weight or are they void ab initio?
And if they are in fact void, then how to proceed?
"Interest of Justice Initiates Unprecedented International Legal Enforcement Action Under Peremptory Norms of International Law"
"Historic Legal Challenge Escalates to Formal Default Notice Against All WHO Member States"
"Our legal strategy seeks comprehensive remediation that goes beyond merely stopping implementation of the invalid amendments to require active restoration of the constitutional and legal order that existed prior to their adoption"
Yup, it's a complicated legal mess, but what did we expect of the WHO?
Late News:
The United States has REJECTED the amendments to the International Health Regulations
