Tip - If you are using a phone, set the "Desktop Site" option in your browser   

2025-01-22

The continuing UK Covid Inquiry has been, some believe, just a gargantuan whitewash exercise in favour of the team that brought us the Covid "pandemic".

The US too has had its own version of the Covid Inquiry, so how does it fare by comparison? And does anybody care? Should anybody care?

In my view, yes we should, because right or wrong, it betrays much about current thinking and therefore likely future "pandemic" planning. Will such be based upon firmer ground than last time?

We on this site have made our views clear, that the whole operation was a simple scam based upon blatant manipulation of the statistics on a global scale, a manipulation designed to divert attribution of the normal seasonal winter deaths away from the normal flu-like and towards the SARS-Cov-2 Covid label; yet even so a scam so tricky that perhaps it threatened to expose another vastly greater scam, that in turn threatened the reputation and future of almost the entire medical-pharmaceutical-industrial-media complex.

Much has been made of the infamous "gain of function" research conducted over time at various locations world-wide under the alleged sponsorship of Dr Fauci. Yet when Covid struck in late 2019 and through 2020, the deaths from all causes barely registered any rise.

How so, when so many were "dying of/with covid"?

Well, most unusually, they were no longer "dying of flu". No surprise one might think, given the measures adopted to test for covid and attribute any subsequent death to covid simply on the basis of the test.

Excess deaths from all causes did start to rise in 2021, coincidentally with the roll-out of the jabs. A coincidence that it seems has never impinged upon the consciousness of our medical regulators, despite the obvious possibilities.

So a plausible hypothesis is that the illusion of a pandemic was perpetrated by simply changing the rules to attribute as many ordinary deaths as possible to the pandemic, and letting the media rip with incessant propaganda about covid deaths, and (when those naturally tailed off into the advancing summer) seguing shamelessly into reporting "cases" ie: positive test results in the asymptomatic population.

These were likely not cases at all, but a true measure of the level of false positive test results obtained by testing the largely healthy population.

If this argument holds water, then what are we to make of the good Dr Fauci's investments in illegal gain-of-function research? Surely the above argument must be false?

But maybe, just maybe, Dr Fauci was protecting a much bigger scam that would bring down the majority of the pharmaceutical industry were it to be exposed? What if (as Dr Mike Yeadon, an erstwhile vice-president of Pfizer UK, now proposes) the whole science of virology is the main scam that must at all costs be protected? 

Has anybody yet shown that any alleged virus has ever been proven to cause a disease? It does seem that all FOIA requests for confirmation of an isolation of the SARS-Cov-2 virus (to pick a recent example of some importance) have failed to identify the existence any such sample. 

Have the Americans had any better success with their "Covid Inquiry", or "Covid Select" as they call it?

Or were the so obsessed with investigating every possible detail that they failed to challenge the elephant in the room?