2026-05-02
Is this the end of the road?
Following on from Martin's briefing on his application to the High Court, he has a result, which (loosely translated) amounts to "Don't bother us with your Tom-fool legal arguments, we don't deign to reply".
But what did we expect?
An alternative explanation might be "We know this is not constitutionally satisfactory, but we don't care and we admit nothing".
Or it might be "Your case is important to us, but we have neither time nor inclination to hear it when the football's on telly".
"My personal sense of the matter is that I have hit a raw nerve"
Quite so.
" ... this strike-out achieves what I set out to do ..."
The possibilities to take this further seem few, but are they now beyond the power of Martin the "legal beagle" litigant in person to sniff out?
Or will he decide that life is for living ...
