Health

2025-03-28

Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.

Interest of Justice reviews America's withdrawal from the WHO, apparently only to set up the CDC under RFK Jr as a similarly unaccountable and dictatorial authority.

Given that our own medical regulators "always" take their lead from the US authorities, this affects the UK and elsewhere just as much as it affects America.

"The newly restructured CDC - which today became the US official pandemic authority - raises profound questions"

What could possibly go wrong?

2025-03-25

I remember reporting on Didier Raoult's findings, back in March 2020 before I started this site (search the article for hydroxychloroquine) but here he is again on the HighWire to recount what happened to his work and what he thinks of the "Chinese lab" theory of origin.

This isn't about the medicine, this is about the concomitant politics.

If COVID was ever actually a real thing, it was readily treatable.

(1hr 56 mins)

Watch on the Highwire.

10:51:33 AM

Now listen up, this is important!

Many believe that the global population is expanding inexorably, and we will soon exhaust all of the world's resources. Humanity is a cancer on the face of the earth.

We must be curbed!

But if the fact is stranger than the fiction, what would be the consequences?

(14 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2025-02-14

... not to mention one or two other matters...

(27 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2025-02-01

The WHO is an exceptionally remote body that is exceptionally well-funded, and through its constitution is more or less obliged to do the bidding of Big Pharma.

How so?

"The WHO is funded by countries and non-state entities"

" ... most of the budget is derived from voluntary funding provided by countries and private or corporate donors"

"Nearly all voluntary funding is ‘specified’... WHO must do the funders’ bidding"

"In response to its funders, the WHO has shifted focus to areas where large Pharma profits can be accrued"

So in effect, he who pays the piper calls the tune.

"Pharma

2025-01-29

Are we living in an asylum run by the insane?

After all, in recent years all the usual social and societal norms have been upended, even the rather longstanding biological differences associated with reproduction of the species (and not merely our own species!) have been declared both obsolete and changeable at will, despite the obvious difficulties and dangers of so doing and the consequent damage to the next generation.

Of course the insane are still able to deploy cunning to advance their misguided objectives, which somehow always seem to involve the need to control others who may not be of their persuasion.

Government may therefore be thought the natural habitat of the insane, being the only outfit legally authorised to deploy compulsion on

2025-01-28

To me it's reasonably obvious that, since the only major pandemic of living memory was the so-called 1918 "Spanish Flu" (about which there is much controversy), there is in point of fact no natural reason to suppose that any string of pandemics is likely to afflict the world any time soon.

Some (including ex-Pfizer Dr Mike Yeadon) believe that the Covid "pandemic" was faked. Whilst the  "science" is either convoluted or obfuscated or maybe both, Occam's Razor suggests that the simplest reasoning may be closest to the truth.

The simplest reasoning has nothing to do with the alleged research conducted by "Bat Lady" at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, and everything to do with the enormous profits to be made from a "pandemic", real or imagined, that would accrue to the pharmaceutical industry for fake vaccines paid for by governments, or by anybody other than the proposed vaccinees themselves who would be

2025-01-28

The Brownstone Institute reviews a number of "the Donald" 's executive orders that have slapped a wide-ranging communications ban on the US public health bureaucracies.

One might speculate that investigative measures may follow in due course, with consequences that only a few outside of the medical-pharmaceutical-public-health bureaucracies may foresee.

"One Health, as newly embraced by the CDC, amounts to a radical transformation of the basis of social order itself, under the guidance of god-like scientists who alone know how to structure the best life for all living things"

"How it came to be that our main engines of public health came to be captured in whole by such a crazed ideology would require a deep and expansive investigation"

"Now Dr.... heads the agency he defied. He remains in that position until the man once called a “fringe epidemiologist” by the previous head of NIH takes

2025-01-27

"Each covid vaccine that is approved has been through rigorous clinical trials and safety checks".

Well, such was the wording received from my MP when I suggested some years ago that the MHRA might not be sufficiently diligent in the matter of ensuring vaccine safety. It hasn't aged well has it?

The truth is leaking out, even if only anecdotally.

But with MPs in thrall to the MHRA's alleged dedication to public safety, who is to provide a properly researched and audited authoritative opinion?

Welcome to the present - it isn't what we thought it was, and nor are our "independent" regulatory agencies.

2025-01-27

A everybody no doubt realises, Baroness Hallett's "Covid Inquiry Module 4" hearings grind on, succumbing to handy confusions over terminology which would be unacceptable in a school debating society.

Are the differences between Process 1 and Process 2 the same as the differences between Processes A and B?

I suppose it depends on how closely and confidently you were able to attend and decipher the long and rambling question.

"The inquiry has thus enabled a situation where the primary failing of the MHRA has apparently been denied. The truth can now be dismissed as yet another ‘conspiracy theory’ "

Happily for us mere mortals, the Perseus Group (who they?) has form in questioning the response of the UK medical regulators to the Covid alleged pandemic, and

2025-01-22

From the name itself, one might think of UFOs / UAPs, or some science-fiction portal concept. The truth seems to be more prosaic, but just as topical and probably just as much misunderstood:

AI

But not just any AI...

Conspiracy Sarah asks the relevant question - what could (possibly) go wrong?

Does Trump believe this stuff?

Or is he indulging his favoured tactic of putting likely miscreants squarely into the limelight for investigation by the public? And if he isn't, it's a good bet that there will be no shortage of public volunteers who will oblige anyway, given the current reputation of the mRNA shots

2025-01-22

The continuing UK Covid Inquiry has been, some believe, just a gargantuan whitewash exercise in favour of the team that brought us the Covid "pandemic".

The US too has had its own version of the Covid Inquiry, so how does it fare by comparison? And does anybody care? Should anybody care?

In my view, yes we should, because right or wrong, it betrays much about current thinking and therefore likely future "pandemic" planning. Will such be based upon firmer ground than last time?

We on this site have made our views clear, that the whole operation was a simple scam based upon blatant manipulation of the statistics on a global scale, a manipulation designed to divert attribution of the normal seasonal winter deaths away from the normal flu-like and towards the SARS-Cov-2 Covid label; yet even so a scam so tricky that perhaps it threatened to expose another vastly greater scam, that in turn threatened the reputation and future of almost the entire

2025-01-21

In amongst a long raft of new Executive Orders, Trump has reportedly signed one to remove the US from the World Health Organisation.

We can now speculate how long it will be before the appropriate personnel are faced with criminal charges.

Read all about it.

2025-01-19

Dr David Martin tells it like it is - once more.

Let us pray that he doesn't have to say it again.

(26 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2025-01-19

"Grooming Gang" territories, to mention three not at random.

These are murky waters wherein the judicial authorities intersected with local and national politicians, police, and indeed the press, evidently to suppress the criminal tragedies that took place over many years.

Consequently, informed and considered discussion about these matters is difficult to find, and prone to degenerate into political point-scoring which isn't productive.

So I welcome this interview between Peter Whittle and Simon Danczuk, a former Labour MP for Rochdale, who gamely answers Peter's questions as best he could - nobody comes out of this topic totally smelling of roses, but it is the sort of discussion that actually does advance our understanding of what took place, how and why, and what might now be best done about it.

You may or may not agree with everything said, but they do bring out some highly pertinent

2025-01-16

Zerohedge reminds us that the "pandemic" would probably have fizzled out except for some populations being deficient in a necessary not-a-vitamin.

I say "reminds us" because this site featured the information back in May 2020, courtesy of a video from Ivor "if a drug did that it would be an enormous blockbuster" Cummins (and he isn't just talking Covid)

ZeroHedge reports.

2025-01-12

This site has maintained that the Covid "pandemic" was a hoax from beginning to end.

Why? Because "they" went to absurd lengths to fix the statistics to make it appear so. If there was a real pandemic, why the need?

Dr Yeadon even believes that the whole "science" of virology is unproven, which would set the cat amongst the pigeons big time. I don't go as far as to assert that, since I don't have the evidence, but I suspect that he's right...

There is so much apparently wrong with the Covid jabs that we might feel non-plussed about where to start.

Dr Mike Yeadon (whom I have followed since 2020) has done a lot of good work in this area, and you can find his substack here.

Dr Roger Hodkinson Speaks to Anna Brees about Covid

2024-12-23

This could be an exhortation for that post-prandial moment - Christmas Dinner has been consumed, the family is gathered around the hearth (well, those that still have one), mellow feelings of satisfaction and togetherness suffuse the atmosphere, and everyone makes due allowance for everyone else's faults and foibles.

In many families this will be a traditional time to hand out and undo the Christmas presents, wanted and unwanted, appreciated and unappreciated, but nevertheless welcomed with gratitude for their generosity - not necessarily in terms of price paid, but in time thoughtfully taken, for time is the ultimate arbiter of value in this world.

It's rare, but sometimes someone has the opportunity to give something of such vast value to so many that the mind recoils in surprise - indeed marvels in amazement that not only were they able to accomplish it with such deceptive ease, but that nobody actually had to pay anything for it!

Perhaps all it needed

2024-12-16

Minutes of the Vaccine Benefit Risk Expert Working Group for Covid-19 are published on the government website.

"Safe and Effective" might be expected to figure prominently in their deliberations, because that was what we the public were told, in no uncertain terms.

"What’s even more troubling from these minutes, is the intention of the UK health authorities to assess the serious risks raised only after authorisation!"

As ever, expect the truth to be "nuanced".

It doesn't paint a good picture, but why publish these minutes at all if the turkeys are still in