Featured

Tip - If you are using a phone, set the "Desktop Site" option in your browser

Fulford White Dragon Report - Monday 3 February 2025

Details: Category: Free Citizen; Published: 04 February 2025; Hits: 198

2025-02-04

Amid all the turmoil unleashed by the first few days of the "Trump Presidency" (I use quotation marks because I still think that there are plenty of grounds for disbelieving appearances), Ben brings us his views about much of the consequences that we have already read elsewhere, interwoven with quite a bit of sauce that we probably have not seen elsewhere or perhaps suspected.

Of course he may just be making educated guesses or he may have sources of information, but this week's report has much to interest us either way.

This onion still has more layers to be exposed ... (modest subscription required for full access).

2025 - Year of Disclosure?

Details: Category: Free Citizen; Published: 02 February 2025; Hits: 714

2025-02-02

This is an introduction to a complex problem - amid nuances galore, we discover that the real history of religion and the religious is obscured by (a) the churches and (b) our own indoctrination in matters historical, archeaological, political, and "scientific".

And all this from a man of the Cloth! From somebody so immersed in the theology of the Anglican Church, I find this is a very hopeful sign that the wholly artificial separation between scientific belief and religious belief that has been tacitly imposed throughout my lifetime is going to be bridged, and quite possibly in our time.

After all, science is simply "knowing the truth" - the truth cannot logically be compartmentalised into religious or scientific. Are not the religious dogmas simply the scientific axioms upon which the edifice of religious theology is founded?

Trigger warning - you may need to cope with the possible upending of much of your world-view, and you should be prepared to make up your own mind on the basis of this and other evidence that you may be able to find.

No need to panic - it's OK to put it into the "too difficult" box for now. But if there is truth in it, then you will have been at least partially mentally prepared for any incoming revelations (so stay ahead with freecitizen.uk!).

But it will still ultimately be up to you to decide what you do, what you may, and what you don't believe. Nobody can do that for you.

(39 minutes)

Like/Dislike this video here.

NB: In many versions of the Bible, the word "Elohim" is routinely translated / interpreted as "God". In The Keys of the Kingdom Holy Bible, a recent translation based upon no particular variant of Christian dogma, this word is included "as is". In purely linguistic terms I'm told it is a plural form of a noun whose singular form is "El".

Is there a link with Biblical names such as Angel, Abel, Samuel, Gabriel, Ezekiel, Michael, and no doubt others to numerous to repeat here? What would be the implications of such a link? I ask because I would quite like to know ...

What is Freedom?

Details: Category: Free Citizen; Published: 02 February 2025; Hits: 669

2025-02-02

Freedom is to have a choice about everything we do, with the proviso that we don't do anything to the detriment of the freedoms of others.

It is in effect freedom of choice. To choose where we go on holiday, to choose for whom we work, to choose our careers (should we be so fortunate as to understand what sort of career we both want and are suited for), to choose by mutual agreement those whom we will marry - or to choose celibacy.

Nobody doubts that of all these freedoms, some choices may actually be mutually incompatible (we in England cannot travel to the Isle of Man by train) but that's life. Some may turn out later to be incompatible (too many marriages do end in divorce) but the principle is that in the end there should be nobody to blame for our successes or failures but ourselves. We are here to make errors and to learn from them.

Of course governments of all hues and proclivities like to control (ie: limit) our freedoms so that we do what they want us to do, and they do that by passing statutes and inventing restrictions "for our safety".

Many of those restrictions are reasonable, as they help to prevent us from impacting on the freedoms of others - few would argue that anybody who hasn't learned the rules of the road and how to drive safely should be allowed to get behind the wheel of a double-decker bus.

Many restrictions may seem designed to collect forfeits from the unwary (unduly low speed limits, and parking charges are a source of contention, to name but two).

Taxes are a primary restriction - you don't get to have any practical say on how the government spends this (quite large) part of your purchasing power on your behalf.

And now the government wants to extend their opportunity to control the other part of your purchasing power, that part that you do still get to spend or save according to your whim and fancy. They don't put it like that of course, but the direction of travel is clear - they will want to very substantially limit your choices to those of which they (the UN-WEF) approve. Who knows where that will end?

Give them an inch and they will take a mile.

Which means that we have to learn from their mistakes, whilst they do not. That is not a recipe for progress.

ChatGPT - Conspiracy Theorist?

Details: Category: Free Citizen; Published: 01 February 2025; Hits: 700

2025-02-01

All you wanted to know about the Great Awakening - but never thought to see from the AI ...

Martin Geddes' latest foray into the heart of the beast - and he comes up Trumps (so to speak)!

"I cannot over-emphasise the impact of AI on my own ability to analyse situations, clarify communications, identify options, select strategies, and write documents. It is absolutely transformative"

Is it for real?

The WHO is Just Doing Its Job

Details: Category: Free Citizen; Published: 01 February 2025; Hits: 741

2025-02-01

The WHO is an exceptionally remote body that is exceptionally well-funded, and through its constitution is more or less obliged to do the bidding of Big Pharma.

How so?

"The WHO is funded by countries and non-state entities"

" ... most of the budget is derived from voluntary funding provided by countries and private or corporate donors"

"Nearly all voluntary funding is ‘specified’ ... WHO must do the funders’ bidding"

"In response to its funders, the WHO has shifted focus to areas where large Pharma profits can be accrued"

So in effect, he who pays the piper calls the tune.

"Pharma must insist on this as it has a fiduciary responsibility to maximise return on investment for its shareholders"

This is of course ideal for the corporate sponsors who have an "independent" global platform to push their vaccines (after all, why push cures only for the tiny minority who fall sick when you can push vaccines for the whole population? And persuade a few hundred governments to pay for them rather than having to persuade populations of billions?).

"While a shamefully willing tool, the WHO is not driving this"

A useful review of the current WHO from the Daily Sceptic.

Page 122 of 313