Tip - If you are using a phone, set the "Desktop Site" option in your browser
Featured
The Post Raid Consequences Incoming
- Details
- Category: Defence
- Hits: 625
2025-06-23
Hard to argue with this analysis - the game has completely changed.
"Iran is not going to be allowed to lose - there will be no defeat of Iran"
Fifteen minutes of clarity.
(15 minutes)
Like / Dislike this video here.
Where's the Beef?
- Details
- Category: Free Citizen
- Hits: 624
2025-06-22
The Donald has bombed Iran's nuclear sites.
Do they even exist? The may or may not have done, but maybe they don't any more.
Scott Ritter is not amused.
"He bombed empty targets - which appears to be the most sage and wise decision of all, because now he has created at least the potential of a window of opportunity to disengage from the disaster he had created"
(6 minutes)
Like / Dislike this video here.
Trump's Ultimatum to Iran
- Details
- Category: Free Citizen
- Hits: 609
2025-06-21
Alex Krainer reminds us that Iran has an independent central bank ... and that has been the downfall of many other countries in the region - whatever the official excuse for war.
Much good sense in this video? It's your view that counts.
(13 minutes)
Watch this video here.
Legal "Just in Case" Rule
- Details
- Category: Legal
- Hits: 743
2025-06-21
Parliament to the rescue?
"A rarely used tool in the legal toolkit could force unconstitutional acts into the open"
So says Martin Geddes, who has asked his AI to unearth the legal routes by which possible illegal or unconstitutional court cases may be challenged.
Only for use when the legality of the proceedings is disputed.
Robin Hood Asserts
- Details
- Category: Legal
- Hits: 704
2025-06-21
"Robin Hood" asserts that all Courts in the UK have been fraudulent ever since at least the 1990s and quite possibly earlier.
When our erstwhile monarchy signed us away into the EU, it thereby lost all the authority previously enjoyed, by failing to defend us against the imposition of rule by foreigners not bound by our ancient constitution.
Some might consider that "treason".
But he asserts that Courts are anyway no longer "Crown Courts" ever since the Crown Officers were removed.
What we have now are Corporate Courts whose only authority is to mediate differences between Corporate entities under the Law of the Sea. As individual subjects of the monarchy living on the land, we don't come under the Corporate Law of the Sea.
So they bamboozle us with English words with undisclosed legalese meanings that we as uneducated non-legal people not only do not understand, but we are bound to misunderstand ("misinformation" anybody?) - they give us a capitalised legal fiction name at birth and then let us identify ourselves as that legal fiction when we appear in Court, thus adopting their requirement to appear before them as a corporate entity that can be adjudicated under the law of the sea. That is deceit and the offence is to withhold the whole truth of what is going on.
"In order to make sense of this, you need to grasp how our courts have abandoned constitutional rights in favour of commercial maritime law, as per the Crown Agents Act 1995, with effective dissolution in 1997. This marked a jurisdictional severance: agents once bound by common law fiduciary duty were replaced with corporate contractors enforcing policy."
Martin Geddes notes exactly how this legal switch is both hidden and enforced.
Page 64 of 312
