Legal Legal Repeal

2025-12-17

Did the BBC always suffer from Trump Derangement Syndrome?

Well, it probably does now. The Donald is suing them in Florida for defamation, and potentially for trying to influence the outcome of the 2024 presidential election. For $Billions. Nobody can say how much just yet as it may include punitive damages if sufficient intent is proven. Which doesn't seem unlikely to me.

Of course whatever damages are awarded, getting that much money out of the BBC might be an international issue, and affect whether the BBC can survive in its current format. If uptake of the licence fee is any indication, the Great British Public is already voting by closing their wallets, so finance is likely an issue.

"For perhaps the first time, the BBC will face a legal process in which discovery is compulsory. Panorama producers and editors will have to surrender

2025-12-16

Operation Talla as investigated by Ian Clayton (Ethical Approach UK) and reported by Mark Sexton has had the effect of preventing the operation of Justice in the UK, by the expedient of censoring the reporting of certain alleged high crimes and misdemeanours.

This article follows on from our earlier report.

Such action by the police (possibly supported by others) has exposed our executive government as a lawless organisation that has deliberately and almost certainly illegally (I am not a lawyer!) denied justice to the people.

However you look at it, the allegations suppressed were so serious that justice had to be seen to be done. Even by setting up the Covid Enquiry, the government effectively ensured that it was marking its own homework.

Far from Justice being seen to be done by an independent

2025-12-16

"... there are four international universal crimes that can be committed... we brought those into English law and we added the bit about 'aiding and abetting'.... "

Likewise for aiding and abetting 'terrorism'.

So how to enforce the law? Is ignorance of the law a defence in Court if we were never told about that law?

Are we now dug into a hole so deep complex and opaque that it has become impossible - even perhaps for our national leadership - to obey the law?

"Our MPs and Ministers are never told the truth about the international agreements and laws that apply to the waging of war... "

Or would they just lie about it anyway?

"Not only is tax immoral, it's also unnecessary... "

Oh I say! Steady on. That's another topic altogether

2025-12-14

... one generation at a time.

Another story of taxation run wild.

Is this "peak taxation"? 

Not a chance, except for an intervening general economic collapse, or maybe a general taxation strike - pretty difficult when your employer pays your tax to HMRC before he pays you...

An interesting question though - if your employer owes you money under your contract of employment, are they entitled to give some of it to someone else just because the someone else says so? Custom and practice is not necessarily law, and we are discovering new things every day now. 

Although it's an interesting question, maybe the first port of call would be to check the fine print in your offer/contract of employment....   and after that, a session with ChatGpt or maybe Grok.

2025-12-10

Martin Geddes is still inventing the vocabulary that will adequately convey the meaning behind the frankly (mostly but not necessarily) illegalSJP (Single Justice Procedure).

See what you think...

Mistalitarianism: the violence of non-being

2025-12-08

Landlords - a group of people just out to make as much money as they can from the poor and dispossessed? So how does this differ from any other business?

In my far away youth I rented a flat beside a railway line so that I could attend my workplace, which was in an unfamiliar part of the country. Looking back it was quite OK - one or two niggles but I think I gave as many as I got! I had previously rented during my workplace year as a sandwich course student - again, it was OK except that when I left, my deposit was obviously firmly ensconced and not to be parted from it's current billet.

You could say that I was treated badly, but I was also learning lessons about life which would stand me in good stead.

Fast forward to today and a landlord puts his side of the rentings story, and yes, there is no aspect of life that government cannot make worse whilst professing the best of intentions - especially by meddling in the

2025-12-07

It was called "Operation Talla" - but it could have been called "Three Wise Monkeys": Hear no evidence, See no evidence, Admit no evidence.

Search engines will tell you a lot about the Talla Reservoir near Tweedsmuir from 1905 or thereabouts, but haven't apparently caught up with the UK Police Operation Talla from 2021 onward.

Happily we can keep you up to date with the latest news from Ethical Approach UK, and retired (in name only!) policeman Mark Sexton, who have now published the results of their investigations.

This all started back in June 2021 when Mark Sexton went down to the local police station to report a crime.

We...

2025-12-05

Well, if we want to talk about it, we need the words.

Martin Geddes aided and abetted by his automated assistants Grok and ChatGpt comes up with the goods:

2025-12-03

Graham Moore Unleashed.

Watch and take note.

This is the third of three parts. See the links for parts 1 and 2.

It's a lot to get one's head around, and it covers a lot of ground, so take it slowly. 

(68 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video there.

2025-12-02

(17 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

"The EU leaders will have to make an official decision..."

And there you have it.

2025-12-02

Ethical Approach UK, and Mark Sexton.

Original message shared here.

The ensuing silence is DEAFENING.

Mark is right, we need to share this everywhere. It's not hearsay, it's evidence that has been carefully documented and provided in good faith to all the appropriate authorities, who have nationally taken inappropriate steps to ensure that it is ignored in direct contravention of the laws governing policing.

"This is not independent policing. It is policing functioning as an extension of the executive government establishment - operating to shield itself,

2025-12-01

Martin Geddes has established (at least to his logic-based satisfaction) that some, maybe many of the "magistrates courts" currently "hearing cases" have defective foundation in law, and cannot therefore operate within the law. 

And, with a little help from one or two AI assistants, he has developed a procedure for validating such "courts", a procedure which (he asserts) anybody in receipt of a summons (or other legal demand from the State) may use to verify its authenticity.

"For the first time in British history, citizens can formally verify the legality of the State"

He lists the process by which he came to the "court name requirement specification", and then lays out that specification itself, as deduced by AI from the Magistrates Court Act 1980.

Worth

2025-11-29

(11 minutes)

2025-11-28

It is now common knowledge, or at least knowledge in the public domain, that the police forces nationally were ordered not to investigate allegations and evidence of unlawful activity in connection with the 2020/21 and later Covid vaccination drives.

They are alleged to have behaved as an arm of government rather than as impartial enforcers of the law.

Ian Clayton (Ethical Approach UK) and Mark Sexton (retired police constable) have been investigating how this came about.

They now

2025-11-27

Well, it looks as though the WHO may be right about the next pandemic, at any rate if you believe the latest attempt to scare us witless that our children will shortly be dying in numbers due to... well I never, a pandemic!

Happily "our government" is on the ball already, and has been running "Project Pegasus" planning exercise to sort out our preparedness, just in case there might be another pandemic.

"Exercise Pegasus was designated a “Tier 1” national emergency exercise, meaning it involved ministerial participation, all devolved nations and activation of COBRA, the Cabinet Office Briefing Room"

It's unclear as yet whether the familiar trusted names (Prof Ferguson, Boris Johnson, Matt Hancock, Patrick Vallance et al) would be available this time around, but I do hope so! If these

2025-11-26

First up, a plea from Mark Attwood to those NHS and other medical staff who now realise that maybe, just maybe, inoculating the public at large with novel medical technology that

• had been developed "at warp speed" within months whilst earlier vaccines had required years of testing,
• had not been approved for general use except under an Emergency Use Authorisation,
• to allegedly defend against the "emergency" of a deadly "pandemic" that had no statistically significant effect upon the normally expected rate of "deaths from all causes", 
• which overwhelmingly "killed" people with comorbidities at around their expected lifespan, and  had no measurable effect on children who were nevertheless inoculated anyway,
• which was administered without any pretence at "informed consent", and indeed for some people under

2025-11-26

The administrative government, seemingly oblivious to the constitutional need for our citizens to be judged by a "jury of our peers", now proposes, in order to cut the administrative backlog now denying justice to criminals and victims alike, to abolish the right to a jury for "non-serious" offences.

Magna Carta? What's that? How old-fashioned! We need to be modern, and grasp the benefits that modernity offers! Who would not want justice delivered promptly and without fear? Ancient and outdated tradition must not be permitted to stand in the way of progress!

This is how the ignorant and the mendacious want to convince us to abandon what remains of our Constitution so that they may better rule the people by decree. No matter that it is the people themselves who were sovereign, have always been sovereign, still are sovereign, and will always be sovereign unless and until they give up their sovereignty for the

2025-11-25

Yes, Martin Geddes has been up to his illuminations of matters legal and lawful, in terms that I would wager most of us could comprehend.

If we were asked to attend court and found ourselves "had up" before the head teacher in the local secondary school, we might begin to question the genuineness not only of the proceedings but also of those conducting the proceedings.

"When is a 'Court' not a Court?" would be a relevant question, and the Head Teacher should have some explaining to do.

Still, if instead we had attended in a building labelled as a "Court" and been confronted by somebody professing to be a magistrate, would anybody dare to question the legitimacy of the situation? Yet the overwhelming likelihood of just accepting the given as legitimate surely is an open invitation for fraudsters to take advantage? Even unwitting fraudsters who themselves had not validated their higher authority?

2025-11-23

Interest of Justice found out in Costa Rica.

They have the win, they now have to sue enough national governments to start a global ball of Nuremberg trials rolling...

... and that costs dosh.

It sounds a lot, but there's a lot of us, so per capita it won't break the bank.

That's the theory anyway, and so far it's been proven correct.

It's doable, and it's down to us.

And they have the win to prove it.

2025-11-22

Some may think that the UN is on borrowed time on a number of different fronts, and that may be true, but here we are talking about their Humpty Dumpty attitude to words, specifically here the words associated with gender affirmations and the if-you-don't-like-your-gender-you-can-change-it attitude.

Of course if you simply change your sex by affirmation, life merely becomes difficult and fraught with argument and misunderstanding (with a risk of violence in some situations), but if you pretend to change it by having the ops and the drugs in addition to the delusions, well it will likely turn out to be life ending for those-who-might-have-been-your-off-spring.

(3 minutes)