2026-02-11
If we care about the way that Justice (in its widest sense) is administered in this country, and maybe if we have an academic approach to such matters, then I guess we should.
If our academic abilities are dodgy but out approach logical, then we probably should.
If our logic is all over the place and we still have implicit faith in our authorities, then I would steer well clear.
That said, Martin Geddes has come up with an analytical approach (the "Delta-Sigma framework") to assess legalistic encounters with our authorities, that clarifies how our approach may be usefully constructed to illuminate the responses provided by authorities to our legitimate queries.
The previously unachievable (due to the huge investment of time and research required) being now achievable by anybody with a practical working knowledge of AI and the tenacity and logical mind necessary to work through the framework.
It will not guarantee the outcome that you want, it simply analyses the nature of the responses achieved, and allows assessment of the possibility that further enquiry may prove fruitful.
Note that whilst we might expect authorities to be able and willing to quote the legal chapter and verse that underpins their response, there are other legal ways to respond that do not provide such certainty. In fact, it may not be in their interests to do so either.
Political parties that push legislation in Parliament may have an interest in this ... one way or another.
The Delta-Sigma Audit Framework.
