Featured

Tip - If you are using a phone, set the "Desktop Site" option in your browser

Fake Powers, Fake Courts, Fake Sovereignty

Details: Category: Legal; Published: 08 February 2023; Hits: 1170

2023-02-08

How far has our system of government, including separation of powers (download), fallen?

Some would say a considerable distance further than most of us realise.

That is for most circumstances understandable - few people in the UK make a study of constitutional law and not very many overall get dragged through the courts to find out the hard way.

However, with our executive branch getting ever more overbearing in nature, as exemplified by the coercion attempted in the name of "Covid", it's certainly time to take stock and work out whether they really have the powers to order us around that they claim, Covid or no Covid.

"The corruption has become so systemic and normalised that it is quite a shock to realise how far we have fallen"

"The list of laws being broken here is getting longer and longer… Documentary Evidence Act 1868, Forgery Act 1913, Theft Act 1968 sections 17 and 21, Fraud Act 2006 sections 2 and 3, Protection from Harassment 1997, Treason Act 1571, Treason Act 1795, Coronation Oath 1688, Bill of Rights 1689, Act of Settlement 1700 ..."

... and that's before we consider our most famous founding constitutional document - Magna Carta 1215.

Martin Geddes takes us on a tour of the blatant disregard that our current parliament (not to mention our Royal Courts of Justice) has for our constitution:

"We have been hoaxed into answering to our legal personas rather than standing as free men and women, and conned into playing debtors rather than creditors of any associated trusts"

"In a communist state there is only administrative law, since individual liberty is crushed, and that is close to where we find ourselves"

" ... the crime is deliberately structured to lose accountability in the byzantine maze of regulations and institutional interfaces"

Stand by to be amazed.

Climate Change Flooding UK Schools

Details: Category: Free Citizen; Published: 03 February 2023; Hits: 1345

2023-02-03

It's no secret that our schools are not teaching our kids how to think - they are teaching them what they want them to think.

This was brought home to me in 2019 when I attended a General election hustings at a local school - there was no dissent, climate change was an emergency and what were we going to do about it?

"Give me the child until seven, and I will give you the man, said Aristotle, a phrase understood down the ages"

" ... there are few ideas in today’s climate political agenda that require more faith than the forecasts of climate models"

Succinctly put.

"The school briefing notes suggest that climate models 'have been used to make accurate projections for the past 50 years, and have advanced significantly during this time' "

"In fact, it would more accurate to say that they have never produced an accurate forecast in 50 years of trying. Far from becoming more accurate, they are becoming almost laughably inaccurate"

The Daily Sceptic attempts to redress the balance:

"The World Climate Declaration has been signed by almost 300 university professors, led by a Nobel physics laureate Professor Ivar Giaever. 'We should free ourselves from the naïve belief in immature climate models ... In future, climate research must give significantly more emphasis to empirical science' "

Amen to that.

"Children are also advised to pick an activist from a list including Greta Thunberg and George Monbiot, and fill a poster board full of their good works. Letters to policymakers should stress the emotional, they are told"

Wait! Are our teachers supposed to be training our children just to be climate campaigners? Critical thinking is there none.

"As with the Jesuits, so with the new climate religion. Belief is everything. 'There are no grey areas when it comes to survival' "

And no grey areas when it comes to indoctrination of our next generation on this scale either.

So just who is behind this blatant operation to brainwash the climate change narrative into our children?

The Daily Sceptic reveals all.

The Jury - A Political Institution?

Details: Category: Legal; Published: 03 February 2023; Hits: 1205

2023-02-03

The common law jury:

" ... a political institution, embodying the sovereignty of the people, and the very best way of preparing a people to be free"

I didn't see that coming!

Once more Richard Vobes nails a most informative, probably better described as definitive, interview with constitutional expert William Keyte.

Wow!

Essential viewing which clarifies multiple aspects of our current national and global situation:

" ... they're trying to inject these ... globalist policies into our system by bypassing our ... traditional governmental mechanisms ... the people who are doing this behind the scenes ... really don't like ... national constitutions ... "

" ... if the people who are ... aware ... start standing on the constitution, and understand it and embrace it, and start holding the government's feet to the fire through the mechanisms that they know they are meant to be bound by ... this will work but we have to educate ourselves first ... "

(48 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

Chemtrails - Conspiracy Theory Debunked?

Details: Category: Conspiracy; Published: 01 February 2023; Hits: 1226

2023-02-01

We've all seen them - a web of jet trails in the sky that eventually dissipate to turn a lovely sky-blue day into a grey miasma.

This site has posted a number of articles about them, and several other web-sites of international renown are either devoted to them or mention them occasionally.

So are they a conspiracy theory? Evidently not; there are many days when we can observe these phenomena with our own eyes.

But what is their cause?

I don't think that anybody has yet comprehensively pin-pointed a cause, and indeed it's quite possible to consider that there may be more than one cause. However, Arthur Firstenberg (author of magnum opus The Invisible Rainbow) in his latest newsletter recounts a convincing history, and suggests that whether or not they form depends upon the particular prevailing atmospheric conditions - a suggestion that many (including myself) may find perfectly plausible.

Of course whether this is the sole cause of such phenomena globally may be another question, but it seems unlikely that we may get a definitive answer to that one any time soon.

Perhaps it may still be too early to assert that we have identified a conspiracy theory that really can be discounted!

Is Wireless Radiation Believed Linked to Covid-19?

Details: Category: Free Citizen; Published: 29 January 2023; Hits: 1291

2023-01-29

Ever since the first 5G-equipped cruise ships docked in Japan with cases of Covid-19, those of us who were alert to the fact that some people are adversely affected by wireless radiation were wondering if these facts were linked.

That suspicion was reinforced when it was reported that Wuhan had turned on its 5G systems at around the same time that the Covid-19 outbreak there first came to global attention.

And finally, a New York doctor made a video where he was saying that the official protocol for Covid-19 patients didn't work because the "pneumonia" wasn't like normal pneumonia where the lungs were filling up - the lungs were remaining dry but the blood oxygenation was still deficient. Not pneumonia then but pneumonitis - a recognised symptom of radiation exposure.

So what to make of it all?

Here is a video made by an independent researcher/tech-nerd who had nothing better to do during the early lockdowns - could 5G account for the more general incidence of "Covid-19":

(15 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

And here is a very recent presentation that draws attention to a PubMed article that does draw a link - albeit not necessarily totally direct and utterly conclusive:

(7 minutes)

So I repeat - what to make of it all?

Covid-19 symptoms are generic to many ailments - radiation, flu, common cold, "flu-like" (so called because they are like flu but don't appear to be caused by a recognised flu virus) and so on.

The only way that people knew if they "had Covid" was through the test.

So if that test was flawed and gave lots of false positives, then in the early days we would be seeing "Covid" all over the place even where there was none.

And we know from the WHO themselves that if you are testing for disease X in a largely disease X free population, what you are in effect doing is testing the test, and what you will get is an estimate of the number of false positive test results where no disease X exists! So for example, even if your test is 99% accurate (and there are good reasons to believe that the PCR-Test was never accurate or even specified to a repeatable standard) you will still get 100 "cases" in every 10000 tests conducted. This is simple mathematics.

So Scottie could well have been looking at a far bigger and more widespread "Covid-19" distribution than was in actual fact the case.

All of which brings us back to reality - there is too much that we don't know about the true incidence of Covid-19 because the testing regime was (and almost certainly still is) unfit for purpose, and that makes it impossible to draw conclusions about possible causes.

All possible causes perhaps except one - that the whole exercise was a gigantic hoax - we can't prove the exact nature of the Covid-19 hoax but we can say with a huge degree of confidence that it was deliberately and vexatiously planned by the WHO (and associates) who being very clever people would have / should have known that the PCR Test was completely unfit for purpose.

Page 264 of 309