Tip - If you are using a phone, set the "Desktop Site" option in your browser   

Featured

Details
Category: Free Citizen
Hits: 1625

2023-12-26

My apologies for taking Christmas Day off 🙂.

It seems that Benjamin Fulford did not, so here we present his Christmas 2023 report for Monday 25th December.

" ... both China and the West (the rest of the world not so much) need to completely change their long, short and medium turn economic plans"

"The victors in the war against the KM are now presenting plans that are astonishing in their scale and ambition"

"Once the plans on how to accomplish this are worked out, the result will make the Cambrian explosion look like a champagne bubble by comparison"

We stand on the threshold of a new age, a new era, a new eon perhaps.

Buckle up. Do we trust any government that relies on coercion to take us into it?

Happy New Year!  (modest subscription required - unless you read it next Tuesday)

 

Details
Category: Free Citizen
Hits: 1433

2023-12-25

Oh what a tangled web we weave when first we practise to deceive!

Brownstone Institute reminds us of the work done by Sasha Latypova and Katherine Watt (as reported here earlier).

If you are not familiar with this yet, then steel yourself for the most outrageous Covid revelation so far.

Whether or not you consider that the "emergency" justified the actions taken, did it justify bypassing all the normal processes protocols and responsibilities without telling anybody? This goes to the heart of whether the government works for the people, or the people are slaves to the government (and on whose side the WHO operates).

Nevertheless the arguments over the legalese become irrelevant when we realize that they were quite prepared to vaccinate the whole world with a product that at best nobody knew would work, and many had good grounds to believe would be more dangerous that doing nothing, all at huge damage to the global economy. To can it up front should have been a no-brainer on practical considerations alone - unless the true objective was to achieve some undeclared purpose unrelated to Covid prevention.

Of course, "they wouldn't do that would they?". But maybe they just did.

It's funny how conspiracies beget conspiracy theorists.

 

Details
Category: Free Citizen
Hits: 1418

2023-12-24

Putting much of the seemingly senseless activity of recent years into an overarching context, this article from Zero Hedge paints an admittedly complex picture that does knit a large number of seemingly disparate threads together.

It's about power, and who controls that power.

This level of global politicking is above my pay grade, but there does seem to be great deal going on these days that could well herald a marked shift in the global order of things.

Luongo: No One Has Really Grokked How Big The Suez/Houthi Gambit Is

 

Details
Category: Free Citizen
Hits: 1488

2023-12-19

So what "strange stuff" might be going in within the hallowed walls of Westminster Hall in Parliament?

The long-awaited Parliamentary debate on e-Petition 635904 on the proposed WHO measures (including the so-called "Pandemic Treaty" and the changes to the International Health Regulations) took place yesterday Monday 18th December.

We applaud Dr John Campbell for publishing selected speeches from this debate (which would otherwise be long and perhaps difficult to navigate - but there is a link below 🙂).

If you ask me, these 3 speeches represent Parliament at its finest - concise, clear, and on point. Strange stuff indeed ...

1) Mr Philip Davies MP (Shipley) (10 minutes)

 

Like / Dislike this Video here.

2) Sir John Redwood MP (Wokingham) (7 minutes)

 

Like / Dislike this video here.

3) Andrew Bridgen MP (North West Leicestershire) (25 minutes)

 

Like / Dislike this video here.

Watch the full debate on Parliament TV. (2 hours)

 

Details
Category: Free Citizen
Hits: 1092

2023-12-17

For those dissatisfied with our "democracy", one of the problems that presents is how to demonstrate that dissatisfaction at the ballot box without voting for somebody that has little or no public standing.

It is true that one can spoil one's paper, which whilst it does indicate dissatisfaction is also not very effective, since the reasoning behind such spoilage cannot be reliably ascertained and is never formally reported (except to the candidates in person at the count). In short, dissatisfaction thus demonstrated is readily brushed aside, and many who don't want to vote for any candidate on offer will simply stay away from the poll and thus be (wronly) presumed disinterested.

But what if ...
... there was a NOTA (none of the above) option on the ballot paper in addition to the names of the candidates? Well, probably not of itself effective, since this too could be brushed aside ...
... unless of course NOTA could actually be elected!

What would this mean?

It could mean that the seat in Parliament (or the local council) would simply be left vacant, thus proving an embarrassment to the system but little else, barring a vanishingly unlikely mass vote for NOTA across the entire electorate. 

But with an appropriate process to rectify the vacancy to the electorate's satisfaction, this idea could hold promise.

Would it be enough of itself to bring meaningful reform to the overall system?

In my view, given the stranglehold that the main parties have on our voting habits currently, very probably not, but as part of a wider package of electoral reform, I would suggest that it should have a place. After all, if NOTA comes in first past the post, then it's hard to argue that the electorate would be happy to be represented by any of the actual candidates on offer.

"The huge show of public support for NOTA that this provoked compelled the PCRC to recommend in it’s final report (published 05/02/15) that the next government hold a public consultation before May 2016 specifically on inclusion of NOTA on ballot papers"

So it looks as though there is significant support by the public for such a facility, even if the government of the day somehow didn't find the time/resources to mount that pubic consultation.

And the monetary costs of adding NOTA to every ballot paper would be as near zero as makes no difference for electoral purposes, so what's not to like?

(11 minutes)

 

Like / Dislike this video here.

More at -

None of the Above UK

The Ability to Formally Withhold Consent at elections (Download)

  1. An Encouragement for Our Time
  2. Will AI Rule the World?
  3. "The Great NHS Heist"
  4. Dr Mike Yeadon Spells it Out
  5. The Independent Alliance - The Cure for Parliament?
  6. 4th December Presentations for UK Parliamentarians
  7. Just Another Conspiracy Theory - Pay No Attention
  8. Yes, the MHRA is Asleep at the Wheel in Some Respects
  9. Are We Ready for Hypernovelty?
  10. China Virus Pandemic Mk 2 in Gestation?

Page 214 of 310