Tip - If you are using a phone, set the "Desktop Site" option in your browser   

Featured

Details
Category: Free Citizen
Hits: 1077

2024-03-04

Hold onto your hats!

Ben's report this week points up a great deal of activity that does not augur well for the New World Order, AKA the Deep State, epitomised by the UN-WEF "partnership".

"This ultimatum ... comes in the wake of a comprehensive purge of high-level Khazarian Mafia leaders and military defeat in Ukraine"

" ... However, the battle is not over yet" 

Modest subscription required.

 

Details
Category: Defence
Hits: 908

2024-03-04

"Everyone involved is therefore aware that they are waging war against Russia, i.e. the NATO-Russia war is already a reality. This means that Russia is also entitled to attack NATO targets. The fact that the Russian government has not (yet) done so indicates once again that Russia is pursuing a de-escalating course, while the West is fully committed to escalation"

Well, that just about sums it up - we are waging an undeclared war on Russia, and trying to hide behind Ukraine. Russia knows it and has known it for some time, but has tired of pretending that it doesn't know.

The only reason we can now say that we know is that Russia herself has published the proof, hinting that she may also know a great deal more about NATO's war planning that she is keeping to herself - after all, why give away all her secrets to the enemy? 

We do know that Russia has been far better prepared to defend herself in terms of battlefield logistics than NATO has been to attack. It would be a very surprising omission if she were not also far better prepared than NATO in terms of access to information about her enemy's plans.

" 50 or even 100 Taurus would be delivered, but that these would have no influence on the course of the war. The question arises as to why this is even being considered – the answer is clear: marketing and politics and the absolute will to escalate"

So on the face of it this is simply war for war's sake.

All I can say is that this lunacy can only be calculated to provoke Russia into escalation, to attack the concerned NATO countries directly. Then they can claim that Russia has attacked the UK and that we must fight them to the death.

Problem - reaction - solution.

Hope and pray that Russia doesn't fall for it.

Details
Category: Free Citizen
Hits: 955

2024-03-03

The link (if any) between roll out of the jabs and increased levels of death by heart and circulatory disease was (perhaps somewhat grudgingly) debated, but no mention of excess deaths from other causes (such as cancer) which have been reported, and only a ministerial response to "write to" the MPs who raised specific queries.

At this rate of progress we had better all start briefing our kids to ask for the full response "in due course" because we will all be deceased long before those in authority deem it necessary to actually produce the information requested.

The Daily Sceptic reports.

 

Details
Category: Defence
Hits: 1070

2024-03-02

With talk of nuclear escalation much in the news these days, ZeroHedge reminds us that a Ukraine-Russia peace plan was reportedly substantially agreed within months of the initial Russian incursion, but that initial agreement was supposedly vetoed by Boris Johnson. Although what it had to do with him isn't at all obvious, it does tend to indicate that Ukraine is not its own master. 

It doesn't say much for Boris Johnson either, although in fairness despite various reports to that effect, I have no proof of his involvement (but why wasn't he involved in facilitating a peace deal?).

Add in widely reported US involvement in the 2014 Maidan revolution, and readers may draw their own conclusions.

Since then, according to retired military experts Colonel Macgregor and Scott Ritter, "the West" has done its best to keep the hostilities in place, even to attempt to break through the Russian defences, leading to approaching half a million additional Ukrainians now dead.

There are now credible (but unproven to my knowledge) reports that troops from NATO nations are in Ukraine operating or providing active support for the operation of the complex weaponry already delivered, such as Storm Shadow, which have reportedly been used to sink Russian ships and attack Russian infrastructure, even targets within Russia itself. 

If these reports are true (and in the circumstances it's not hard to believe them) then the gap between the UK being at peace and being at war with Russia seems now to be cigarette paper thin. 

And US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin is reported as saying that if Ukraine falls, he really believes NATO will be in a fight with Russia.

Personally, I don't find any of the above at all reassuring.

ZeroHedge reports.

 

Details
Category: Free Citizen
Hits: 1175

2024-03-02

Humanity is at the cross-roads - and on board a bus being driven as hard and fast as possible into a future that nobody has tested for safety - despite "our safety" being the go-to excuse of our elites to lock us down, jab us with who-knows what, feed us with who-knows what, confine us to quarters, and generally ride roughshod over all our traditional time-honoured freedoms.

Have we noticed yet?

Or are we still too busy playing ever more responsive silly games on our phones?

Do we the people have to separately investigate, conduct our own safety trials, determine any effects detrimental to the environment, document and prove the harm that any and each of these novel technological marvels may do to us and/or the environment, to the satisfaction of a legal system that takes forever, charges exorbitant fees, and may not even be fair and even-handed?

If so, then what are our regulatory authorities for?

Or do those who wish to deploy and profit from these incoming technologies have to prove at their own cost to the regulatory authorities and to the public at large that adequate safety and environmental tests have been conducted, and that these show beyond reasonable doubt that these proposed technologies are harmless when used safely (and define document publish and publicise the meaning of "safely" in each case)?

If so, then who will audit the activities of our regulatory authorities to ensure that they are doing their job?

I only ask because I think we need to know.

Read all about it ...

Did you spot the word that isn't there?

 

  1. Is There Light at the End of the Regulatory Tunnel Vision?
  2. Global Radiation Emergency
  3. Good News for All - Especially Farmers?
  4. The DVLA "Name Fraud"
  5. The True Voice of the Left: Yanis Varoufakis
  6. What Does Bankrupt Birmingham Portend?
  7. It's England Jim, But Not as We Know It ...
  8. "Farmers are Sleepwalking into the Crisis"
  9. Safe? Define "Safe" ...
  10. The Case for Dyson Farming

Page 201 of 311