2025-11-08
Those of us who have been around for years will understand and relate to this more than those who have joined our planet more recently, but we can certainly all learn from it.
Native cultures include our own European cultures - they are still in many ways cohesive, for all the attempts, successful or otherwise, that have tended to whittle away at that cohesion in favour of replacing our reliance on our human community with reliance on the inhuman State.
Yet in chronological sequence, as natives of the seats of the colonizing powers of old (yet still undead) we looked on as native cultures elsewhere were given the treatment, we, thinking ourselves somehow immune, were saved til last to undergo the final treatment that would bring about their global control grid with everybody inside it.
Was the State always inhuman? Yes it was, in so far as except within the ruler's personal court, it always runs on a rule book (or these days infinitely many rule books) which seek to cover the minutiae of all possible eventualities - in point of fact an artificial intelligence on paper that overrode the natural human judgements based on instincts and human emotions.
It's no surprise that AI run entirely by machines is now the favoured underpinning of government activity. "Computer says no" is unarguable when only the supplicant is human. And supplicants we will all be when the only other is the AI in charge.
And it ill be in charge - has anybody troubled to design an AI to act as supplicant? The very notion is preposterous (although as a tool to assist a human supplicant it has been shown to have its uses).
Who needs a Constitution, Parliament, a Statute Book and elections when AI is available to run the world?
