Tip - If you are using a phone, set the "Desktop Site" option in your browser   

2023-05-08

Perhaps we need to start with a review of where his peoples have been taken in prior years, culminating in Charles " ... becoming the official patron of the World Economic Forum’s Great Reset ... ".

Of course the central tenet of royalty is that the bloodline is superior to the bloodlines of the common people, therefore royalty and their sons and daughters are destined to rule the world in perpetuity.

It's not a fashionable tenet these days, but it is counterbalanced to some extent by the notion that the family as an institution is the bedrock of the human species, responsible for the creation and upbringing of each new generation, and having a family as head of state is the highest acknowledgement of this truth.

Still, a family may be functional or dysfunctional, and having a dysfunctional family that cannot be removed from position isn't necessarily a good idea in principle. Nor does the UN's idea that the WHO should determine a common "one size fits all" education policy for everybody's kids seem inherently compatible with the aspirations of the common people. 

We may all have our own views, but it is undeniable that Charles by publicly aligning himself with the WEF has distanced himself from simple democratic principles held dear by his people, who begin to believe that in practice, they don't work as advertised.

Matthew Ehret, a noted Canadian historian, reviews the state of the monarchy past and present.